Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MATH vs SPIR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$48M
5Y Perf.-73.8%
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$601.52B
5Y Perf.-76.8%

MATH vs SPIR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MATH logoMATH
SPIR logoSPIR
IndustryAirlines, Airports & Air ServicesSpecialty Business Services
Market Cap$48M$601.52B
Revenue (TTM)$-432K$72M
Net Income (TTM)$-14M$-25.02B
Gross Margin47.8%40.8%
Operating Margin39.1%-121.4%
Forward P/E2.7x11.4x
Total Debt$213K$8.76B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$24.81B

MATH vs SPIRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MATH
SPIR
StockNov 20May 26Return
Metalpha Technology… (MATH)10026.2-73.8%
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR)10023.2-76.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MATH vs SPIR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MATH leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Spire Global, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited
The Income Pick

MATH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.74
  • Rev growth 165.9%, EPS growth 472.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 1.17x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -75.9% 10Y total return vs MATH's -91.9%
  • +93.2% vs MATH's -42.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMATH logoMATH165.9% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
ValueMATH logoMATHLower P/E (2.7x vs 11.4x)
Quality / MarginsMATH logoMATH35.7% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
Stability / SafetyMATH logoMATHBeta 0.74 vs SPIR's 2.93, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SPIR logoSPIR+93.2% vs MATH's -42.2%
Efficiency (ROA)MATH logoMATH-6.0% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 55.8% vs -0.1%

MATH vs SPIR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMATHLAGGINGSPIR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MATH leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

SPIR and MATH operate at a comparable scale, with $72M and -$432,000 in trailing revenue. MATH is the more profitable business, keeping 35.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months-$432,000$72M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M-$74M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$14M-$25.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$16.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.8%+40.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.1%-121.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+35.7%-349.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.1%-227.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-26.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.3%+59.5%
MATH leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MATH leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 2.7x trailing earnings, MATH trades at a 76% valuation discount to SPIR's 11.4x P/E.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$48M$601.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M$585.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS2.71x11.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.08x8406.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.17x5.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1952.18x
MATH leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MATH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MATH delivers a -56.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-57 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. MATH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPIR's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MATH scores 7/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-56.6%-88.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.0%-47.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+55.8%-0.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+65.3%-0.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M-$16.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$24.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$212,689$8.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-70.04x9.20x
MATH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MATH five years ago would be worth $9,250 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,311 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, SPIR leads with a +93.2% total return vs MATH's -42.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPIR at 50.1% vs MATH's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-51.9%+134.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-42.2%+93.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+11.0%+238.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-7.5%-76.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.9%-75.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.5%+50.1%
SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MATH and SPIR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MATH is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 77.6% from its 52-week high vs MATH's 26.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.74x2.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.17$23.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.00$6.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+26.6%+77.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.948.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded45K1.6M
Evenly matched — MATH and SPIR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricMATH logoMATHMetalpha Technolo…SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts12
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MATH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SPIR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallMetalpha Technology Holding… (MATH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MATH vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MATH or SPIR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the stronger pick with 165.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MATH or SPIR?

On trailing P/E, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the cheapest at 2.

7x versus Spire Global, Inc. at 11. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MATH or SPIR?

Over the past 5 years, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) delivered a total return of -7.

5%, compared to -76. 9% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPIR returned -75. 9% versus MATH's -91. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MATH or SPIR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

74β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 296% more volatile than MATH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 8% for Spire Global, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MATH or SPIR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is pulling ahead at 165.

9% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Metalpha Technology Holding Limited grew EPS 472. 7% year-over-year, compared to 137. 8% for Spire Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MATH leads at 613. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MATH or SPIR?

Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 35. 7% for Metalpha Technology Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MATH leads at 39. 1% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MATH leads at 47. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — MATH or SPIR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is MATH or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

74)). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MATH: -91. 9%, SPIR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between MATH and SPIR?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MATH is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MATH

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 82%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPIR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MATH and SPIR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MATH: 165.9% · SPIR: -26.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MATH: 2.7x · SPIR: 11.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.