Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MATH vs SPIR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
MATH vs SPIR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $48M | $601.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-432K | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-25.02B |
| Gross Margin | 47.8% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 39.1% | -121.4% |
| Forward P/E | 2.7x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $213K | $8.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $24.81B |
MATH vs SPIR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metalpha Technology… (MATH) | 100 | 26.2 | -73.8% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MATH vs SPIR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MATH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.74
- Rev growth 165.9%, EPS growth 472.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 1.17x
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -75.9% 10Y total return vs MATH's -91.9%
- +93.2% vs MATH's -42.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 165.9% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.7x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.7% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs SPIR's 2.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.2% vs MATH's -42.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -6.0% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 55.8% vs -0.1% |
MATH vs SPIR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MATH leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPIR and MATH operate at a comparable scale, with $72M and -$432,000 in trailing revenue. MATH is the more profitable business, keeping 35.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$432,000 | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | -$74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$16.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.8% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | -121.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | -349.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -227.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -26.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +59.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MATH leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.7x trailing earnings, MATH trades at a 76% valuation discount to SPIR's 11.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $48M | $601.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $585.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.71x | 11.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.36x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 8406.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 5.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1952.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MATH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MATH delivers a -56.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-57 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. MATH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPIR's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MATH scores 7/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -56.6% | -88.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.0% | -47.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +55.8% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +65.3% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$16.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $212,689 | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -70.04x | 9.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MATH five years ago would be worth $9,250 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,311 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, SPIR leads with a +93.2% total return vs MATH's -42.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPIR at 50.1% vs MATH's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.9% | +134.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.2% | +93.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.0% | +238.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.5% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.9% | -75.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | +50.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MATH and SPIR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MATH is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 77.6% from its 52-week high vs MATH's 26.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 2.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.17 | $23.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $6.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.6% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 45K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MATH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SPIR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MATH vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MATH or SPIR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the stronger pick with 165.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MATH or SPIR?
On trailing P/E, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the cheapest at 2.
7x versus Spire Global, Inc. at 11. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MATH or SPIR?
Over the past 5 years, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) delivered a total return of -7.
5%, compared to -76. 9% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPIR returned -75. 9% versus MATH's -91. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MATH or SPIR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 296% more volatile than MATH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 8% for Spire Global, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MATH or SPIR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is pulling ahead at 165.
9% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Metalpha Technology Holding Limited grew EPS 472. 7% year-over-year, compared to 137. 8% for Spire Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MATH leads at 613. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MATH or SPIR?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 35. 7% for Metalpha Technology Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MATH leads at 39. 1% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MATH leads at 47. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MATH or SPIR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MATH or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74)). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MATH: -91. 9%, SPIR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MATH and SPIR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MATH is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.