MATV
Mativ Holdings, Inc.
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Market Cap$515M
5Y Perf.-69.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MATV vs SON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SON
Sonoco Products Company
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$5.10B
5Y Perf.-0.2%
MATV vs SON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MATV | SON |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $515M | $5.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.98B | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $76M | $1.04B |
| Gross Margin | 18.1% | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 8.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.12B | $4.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $84M | $378M |
MATV vs SON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MATV
SON
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mativ Holdings, Inc. (MATV) | 100 | 30.9 | -69.1% |
| Sonoco Products Com… (SON) | 100 | 99.8 | -0.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MATV vs SON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SON leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Mativ Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MATV
Mativ Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
MATV is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.68, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.24x
- 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SON's 4.0%
- +94.6% vs SON's +21.9%
Best for: defensive
SON
Sonoco Products Company
The Income Pick
SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 48.6% 10Y total return vs MATV's -32.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SON | 41.7% revenue growth vs MATV's 0.3% |
| Value | SON | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 11.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | SON | 13.8% margin vs MATV's 3.9% |
| Stability / Safety | SON | Beta 0.53 vs MATV's 1.68, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MATV | 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SON's 4.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MATV | +94.6% vs SON's +21.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SON | 9.0% ROA vs MATV's 3.7%, ROIC 6.2% vs 2.1% |
MATV vs SON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2025
MATV vs SON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSONLAGGINGMATV
MATVMativ Holdings, Inc.
1leads
SONSonoco Products Compa…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MATVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MATV4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SON7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SON5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SON2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MATV and SON each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SON is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 3.8x MATV's $2.0B. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MATV's 3.9%.
| Metric | MATVMativ Holdings, I… | SONSonoco Products C… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $198M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $76M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $125M | $266M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +20.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +13.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.1% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.3% | +23.6% |
Evenly matched — MATV and SON each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MATV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SON's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MATV's 8.2x.
| Metric | MATVMativ Holdings, I… | SONSonoco Products C… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $515M | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.52x | 12.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.05x | 8.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.19x | 7.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.49x | 12.99x |
MATV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SON leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SON delivers a 30.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $17 for MATV. SON carries lower financial leverage with a 1.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MATV's 2.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SON scores 7/9 vs MATV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MATVMativ Holdings, I… | SONSonoco Products C… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.1% | +30.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.25x | 1.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $84M | $378M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.76x | 4.60x |
SON leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SON leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SON five years ago would be worth $9,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,984 for MATV. Over the past 12 months, MATV leads with a +94.6% total return vs SON's +21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SON at -1.1% vs MATV's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MATVMativ Holdings, I… | SONSonoco Products C… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.7% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.6% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.8% | -3.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.2% | -9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.3% | +48.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.3% | -1.1% |
SON leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SON is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MATV's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SON currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs MATV's 60.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MATVMativ Holdings, I… | SONSonoco Products C… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.48 | $58.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.87 | $38.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.7% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 406K | 1.1M |
SON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MATV and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MATV as "Buy" and SON as "Buy". For income investors, MATV offers the higher dividend yield at 4.35% vs SON's 4.04%.
| Metric | MATVMativ Holdings, I… | SONSonoco Products C… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $59.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.41 | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.2% |
Evenly matched — MATV and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SON leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MATV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallSonoco Products Company (SON)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MATV vs SON: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MATV or SON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for Mativ Holdings, Inc. (MATV). Sonoco Products Company (SON) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mativ Holdings, Inc. (MATV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MATV or SON?
On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8.
8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MATV or SON?
Over the past 5 years, Sonoco Products Company (SON) delivered a total return of -9.
7%, compared to -70. 2% for Mativ Holdings, Inc. (MATV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SON returned +48. 6% versus MATV's -32. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MATV or SON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus Mativ Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning MATV is approximately 217% more volatile than SON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sonoco Products Company (SON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 134% versus 2% for Mativ Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MATV or SON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.
7% versus 0. 3% for Mativ Holdings, Inc. (MATV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonoco Products Company grew EPS 141. 2% year-over-year, compared to -587. 8% for Mativ Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MATV or SON?
Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
3% net margin versus -17. 0% for Mativ Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SON leads at 9. 5% versus 2. 4% for MATV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SON leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MATV or SON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8.
8x forward P/E versus 11. 0x for Mativ Holdings, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — MATV or SON?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Mativ Holdings, Inc. (MATV) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 4. 0% for Sonoco Products Company (SON).
09Is MATV or SON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 4. 0% yield). Mativ Holdings, Inc. (MATV) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SON: +48. 6%, MATV: -32. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MATV and SON?
These companies operate in different sectors (MATV (Basic Materials) and SON (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MATV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MATV: -1.1% · SON: -1.9%)Net Margin>
%
(MATV: 3.9% · SON: 13.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.