Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAZE vs ACMR vs JPM vs BAC vs ICHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Semiconductors
MAZE vs ACMR vs JPM vs BAC vs ICHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Semiconductors | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $6.22B | $896.00B | $422.78B | $3.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $960M | $280.33B | $191.57B | $959M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $91M | $57.05B | $30.51B | $-51M |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 44.2% | 60.0% | 56.1% | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | 12.5% | 25.9% | 19.7% | -3.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 47.1x | 14.4x | 12.6x | 63.0x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $303M | $942.38B | $365.90B | $186M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $766M | $343.34B | $231.84B | $98M |
MAZE vs ACMR vs JPM vs BAC vs ICHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maze Therapeutics, … (MAZE) | 100 | 150.8 | +50.8% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 457.2 | +357.2% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 120.0 | +20.0% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 121.0 | +21.0% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 316.1 | +216.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAZE vs ACMR vs JPM vs BAC vs ICHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAZE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 6.6%, current ratio 15.50x
ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
- 49.2% 10Y total return vs ICHR's 7.9%
- 15.2% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0%
- 3.4% ROA vs MAZE's -31.8%, ROIC 7.0% vs -99.4%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.81 vs ACMR's 1.33
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 63.0x)
- 20.4% margin vs MAZE's -6.1%
BAC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
- Beta 0.86, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 0.86 vs ICHR's 3.97
ICHR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +361.7% vs JPM's +21.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 63.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs MAZE's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs ICHR's 3.97 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BAC's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +361.7% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs MAZE's -31.8%, ROIC 7.0% vs -99.4% |
MAZE vs ACMR vs JPM vs BAC vs ICHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MAZE vs ACMR vs JPM vs BAC vs ICHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • BAC leads 1 • MAZE leads 0 • ICHR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 14016.6x MAZE's $20M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAZE's -6.1%. On growth, ACMR holds the edge at +34.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $960M | $280.3B | $191.6B | $959M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | $139M | $81.4B | $40.0B | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | $91M | $57.0B | $30.5B | -$51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$122M | -$108M | $100.9B | $12.6B | -$17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | +44.2% | +60.0% | +56.1% | +11.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +12.5% | +25.9% | +19.7% | -3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +9.5% | +20.4% | +15.9% | -5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -11.3% | +36.0% | +6.6% | -1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +34.2% | — | — | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | -20.0% | +16.0% | +18.3% | +46.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BAC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 79% valuation discount to ACMR's 68.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs ACMR's 1.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $6.2B | $896.0B | $422.8B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $5.8B | $1.50T | $556.8B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.89x | 68.58x | 16.00x | 14.66x | -56.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 47.09x | 14.40x | 12.56x | 62.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.93x | 0.90x | 0.95x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 45.79x | 18.36x | 13.92x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.90x | 3.20x | 2.21x | 3.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.91x | 3.28x | 2.47x | 1.39x | 4.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.88x | 33.52x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MAZE. MAZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.6% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +10.1% | -7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.8% | +3.4% | +1.3% | +0.9% | -5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.4% | +7.0% | +4.5% | +3.5% | -3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.1% | +6.6% | +8.9% | +4.5% | -4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.16x | 2.60x | 1.21x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$166M | -$463M | $599.0B | $134.1B | $87M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $766M | $343.3B | $231.8B | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $303M | $942.4B | $365.9B | $186M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.24x | 20.41x | 0.74x | 0.48x | -5.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $29,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,715 for BAC. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +361.7% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 107.4% vs MAZE's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.5% | +109.3% | -0.5% | +1.1% | +325.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.5% | +265.1% | +21.8% | +28.1% | +361.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +792.2% | +138.2% | +103.0% | +141.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +192.4% | +118.2% | +47.1% | +55.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +4924.1% | +465.8% | +368.2% | +788.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +107.4% | +33.6% | +26.6% | +34.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BAC and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs MAZE's 44.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 3.46x | 0.94x | 0.86x | 3.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.65 | $99.45 | $337.25 | $57.55 | $88.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.83 | $23.03 | $262.71 | $43.66 | $13.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.8% | +94.5% | +95.1% | +97.3% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.2 | 64.2 | 59.1 | 68.3 | 65.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 642K | 1.5M | 7.0M | 31.7M | 990K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAZE as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 163.0% upside for MAZE (target: $63) vs -37.1% for ICHR (target: $55). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs ACMR's 0.12%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.25 | $87.50 | $339.75 | $61.13 | $54.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 10 | 61 | 54 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | +1.9% | +2.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 15 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | $5.95 | $1.27 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +3.9% | +5.1% | 0.0% |
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). JPM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
MAZE vs ACMR vs JPM vs BAC vs ICHR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAZE or ACMR or JPM or BAC or ICHR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAZE or ACMR or JPM or BAC or ICHR?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus ACM Research, Inc. at 68. 6x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 1. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAZE or ACMR or JPM or BAC or ICHR?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +192. 4%, compared to +47. 1% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +49. 2% versus MAZE's +50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAZE or ACMR or JPM or BAC or ICHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 97β — meaning ICHR is approximately 360% more volatile than BAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAZE or ACMR or JPM or BAC or ICHR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bank of America Corporation grew EPS 18. 6% year-over-year, compared to -40. 2% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAZE or ACMR or JPM or BAC or ICHR?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -612. 7% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -670. 3% for MAZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAZE leads at 92. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAZE or ACMR or JPM or BAC or ICHR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 1. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 63. 0x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 50. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAZE: 163. 0% to $63. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAZE or ACMR or JPM or BAC or ICHR?
In this comparison, BAC (2.
3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), ACMR (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. MAZE, ICHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAZE or ACMR or JPM or BAC or ICHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 2. 3% yield, +368. 2% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAC: +368. 2%, ACMR: +49. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAZE and ACMR and JPM and BAC and ICHR?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAZE (Healthcare) and ACMR (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and ICHR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, BAC pay a dividend while MAZE, ACMR, ICHR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.