Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MCRI vs RRR vs BYD vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
MCRI vs RRR vs BYD vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $2.10B | $3.18B | $6.42B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $545M | $2.01B | $4.09B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $101M | $188M | $1.84B | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 53.0% | 59.8% | 42.1% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 29.7% | 21.4% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.7x | 17.4x | 11.9x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $58M | $3.27B | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $96M | $142M | $353M | $687M |
MCRI vs RRR vs BYD vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monarch Casino & Re… (MCRI) | 100 | 292.2 | +192.2% |
| Red Rock Resorts, I… (RRR) | 100 | 389.4 | +289.4% |
| Boyd Gaming Corpora… (BYD) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MCRI vs RRR vs BYD vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MCRI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 41.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs BYD's 365.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 4.8%, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 0.70, yield 1.0%, current ratio 0.86x
RRR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 2.2%
- 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BYD's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 23.0x)
- 45.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1%
- 27.9% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs 1.8%
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 5.8% revenue growth vs RRR's 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs RRR's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BYD's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.2% vs PENN's +6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.9% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs 1.8% |
MCRI vs RRR vs BYD vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MCRI vs RRR vs BYD vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCRI leads in 3 of 6 categories
RRR leads 1 • PENN leads 1 • BYD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RRR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.0B annually — 12.8x MCRI's $545M. BYD is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, PENN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $545M | $2.0B | $4.1B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $182M | $795M | $1.2B | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $101M | $188M | $1.8B | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $128M | $610M | $388M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.0% | +59.8% | +42.1% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +29.7% | +21.4% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +9.3% | +45.0% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +30.3% | +9.5% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +3.2% | +2.0% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.1% | +66.7% | -6.8% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PENN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.8x trailing earnings, BYD trades at a 83% valuation discount to MCRI's 21.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RRR's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PENN's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $3.2B | $6.4B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $3.1B | $9.3B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.60x | 17.22x | 3.78x | -2.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.71x | 17.44x | 11.88x | 22.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.63x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.61x | 3.89x | 7.91x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.85x | 1.58x | 1.57x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.09x | 16.59x | 2.67x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.33x | 11.00x | 16.52x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCRI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BYD delivers a 91.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $92 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. MCRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCRI scores 7/9 vs PENN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.7% | +56.6% | +91.8% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.2% | +4.6% | +27.9% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.8% | +23.4% | +12.3% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.7% | +15.9% | +15.1% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.18x | 1.25x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$71M | -$84M | $2.9B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $96M | $142M | $353M | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $58M | $3.3B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 225.55x | 2.99x | 15.78x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCRI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCRI five years ago would be worth $17,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, MCRI leads with a +49.2% total return vs PENN's +6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCRI at 21.7% vs PENN's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.4% | -12.7% | -0.9% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.2% | +29.0% | +21.2% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.4% | +26.2% | +24.2% | -35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.9% | +68.3% | +30.1% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +535.8% | +251.9% | +365.7% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.7% | +8.1% | +7.5% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
MCRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCRI currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs RRR's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.98x | 0.86x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $120.94 | $68.99 | $89.96 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $78.29 | $43.16 | $69.01 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +77.9% | +94.7% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 39.3 | 49.7 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 133K | 964K | 932K | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RRR and BYD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MCRI as "Hold", RRR as "Buy", BYD as "Buy", PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.9% upside for RRR (target: $71) vs -10.9% for MCRI (target: $105). For income investors, RRR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs BYD's 0.84%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $104.50 | $71.44 | $95.00 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 30 | 38 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +2.2% | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.17 | $1.18 | $0.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +2.5% | +12.1% | +15.8% |
MCRI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RRR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
MCRI vs RRR vs BYD vs PENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MCRI or RRR or BYD or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR). Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MCRI or RRR or BYD or PENN?
On trailing P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the cheapest at 3.
8x versus Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. at 21. 6x. On forward P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MCRI or RRR or BYD or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) delivered a total return of +71. 9%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCRI returned +535. 8% versus PENN's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MCRI or RRR or BYD or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 91% more volatile than MCRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MCRI or RRR or BYD or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 3. 7% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boyd Gaming Corporation grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RRR leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MCRI or RRR or BYD or PENN?
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
0% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RRR leads at 29. 7% versus 3. 9% for PENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MCRI or RRR or BYD or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) trades at 11.
9x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRR: 32. 9% to $71. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — MCRI or RRR or BYD or PENN?
In this comparison, RRR (2.
2% yield), MCRI (1. 0% yield), BYD (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PENN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MCRI or RRR or BYD or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
(MCRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 1. 0% yield, +535. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCRI: +535. 8%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MCRI and RRR and BYD and PENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MCRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RRR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BYD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MCRI, RRR, BYD pay a dividend while PENN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.