Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MD vs THC vs NKTR vs AMSF vs HCA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Biotechnology
Insurance - Specialty
Medical - Care Facilities
MD vs THC vs NKTR vs AMSF vs HCA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Biotechnology | Insurance - Specialty | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $1.90B | $17.01B | $1.69B | $569M | $95.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.93B | $21.45B | $55M | $325M | $75.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $174M | $1.70B | $-164M | $46M | $6.78B |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 42.8% | 99.6% | 47.6% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 16.1% | -237.9% | 17.8% | 15.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 10.9x | — | 14.4x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $660M | $13.17B | $149M | $491K | $50.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $375M | $2.88B | $15M | $62M | $1.04B |
MD vs THC vs NKTR vs AMSF vs HCA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pediatrix Medical G… (MD) | 100 | 147.6 | +47.6% |
| Tenet Healthcare Co… (THC) | 100 | 892.1 | +792.1% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) | 100 | 49.4 | -50.6% |
| HCA Healthcare, Inc. (HCA) | 100 | 401.5 | +301.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MD vs THC vs NKTR vs AMSF vs HCA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, MD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
THC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs HCA's 450.5%
- PEG 0.33 vs HCA's 0.67
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.33 vs 0.67
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs AMSF's -29.2%
AMSF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.23, yield 8.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.32x
- Beta 0.23, yield 8.4%, current ratio 0.32x
- 14.3% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
HCA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 29.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.9%
- 7.1% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
- 11.3% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 19.9% vs -57.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.33 vs 0.67 | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.3% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.4% yield, vs HCA's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs AMSF's -29.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 19.9% vs -57.2% |
MD vs THC vs NKTR vs AMSF vs HCA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MD vs THC vs NKTR vs AMSF vs HCA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMSF leads in 2 of 6 categories
THC leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • MD leads 0 • HCA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMSF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCA is the larger business by revenue, generating $75.6B annually — 1368.8x NKTR's $55M. AMSF is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, AMSF holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $21.5B | $55M | $325M | $75.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $252M | $4.3B | -$130M | $58M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $174M | $1.7B | -$164M | $46M | $6.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $238M | $3.3B | -$209M | $8M | $7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +42.8% | +99.6% | +47.6% | +41.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +16.1% | -2.4% | +17.8% | +15.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +7.9% | -3.0% | +14.3% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +15.6% | -3.8% | +2.5% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.9% | +2.8% | -25.3% | +10.3% | +6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | +87.6% | -4.5% | -8.5% | +44.6% |
Valuation Metrics
THC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.8x trailing earnings, MD trades at a 22% valuation discount to HCA's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), THC offers better value at 0.38x vs HCA's 0.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $17.0B | $1.7B | $569M | $95.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $27.3B | $1.8B | $508M | $145.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.82x | 12.53x | -8.57x | 12.27x | 15.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.26x | 10.94x | — | 14.42x | 14.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.38x | — | — | 0.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.66x | 6.34x | — | 8.53x | 9.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.00x | 0.80x | 30.64x | 1.80x | 1.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.26x | 1.97x | 15.66x | 2.30x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.54x | 6.72x | — | 63.83x | 12.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MD delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MD scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.1% | +19.6% | -4.0% | +9.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +5.7% | -62.8% | +5.6% | +11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.8% | +13.2% | -57.2% | +21.9% | +19.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.2% | +13.8% | -55.7% | +16.8% | +27.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 1.47x | 1.66x | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $285M | $10.3B | $134M | -$61M | $49.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $375M | $2.9B | $15M | $62M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $660M | $13.2B | $149M | $491,000 | $50.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.20x | 4.28x | -4.74x | — | 5.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in THC five years ago would be worth $29,044 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,765 for NKTR. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs AMSF's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs AMSF's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.7% | -2.7% | +92.0% | -18.3% | -8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.8% | +27.4% | +818.2% | -29.2% | +19.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.0% | +178.5% | +621.8% | -24.8% | +57.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | +190.4% | -72.3% | -18.9% | +109.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.1% | +523.4% | -59.1% | +31.8% | +450.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +40.7% | +93.3% | -9.1% | +16.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MD and AMSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MD currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs AMSF's 62.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.71x | 1.85x | 0.23x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.99 | $247.21 | $109.00 | $48.54 | $556.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.84 | $146.60 | $7.99 | $29.42 | $330.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.8% | +78.5% | +76.5% | +62.4% | +77.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 52.9 | 53.4 | 34.2 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 772K | 1.2M | 991K | 212K | 1000K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AMSF and HCA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MD as "Hold", THC as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", AMSF as "Buy", HCA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.3% upside for NKTR (target: $133) vs -3.0% for MD (target: $22). For income investors, AMSF offers the higher dividend yield at 8.41% vs HCA's 0.69%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.25 | $268.00 | $132.83 | $44.50 | $527.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 32 | 33 | 6 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +8.4% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.55 | $2.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | +8.4% | 0.0% | +2.1% | +10.5% |
AMSF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). THC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MD vs THC vs NKTR vs AMSF vs HCA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MD or THC or NKTR or AMSF or HCA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCA Healthcare, Inc.
(HCA) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. (MD) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tenet Healthcare Corporation (THC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MD or THC or NKTR or AMSF or HCA?
On trailing P/E, Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc.
(MD) is the cheapest at 11. 8x versus HCA Healthcare, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Tenet Healthcare Corporation wins at 0. 33x versus HCA Healthcare, Inc. 's 0. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MD or THC or NKTR or AMSF or HCA?
Over the past 5 years, Tenet Healthcare Corporation (THC) delivered a total return of +190.
4%, compared to -72. 3% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: THC returned +523. 4% versus MD's -67. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MD or THC or NKTR or AMSF or HCA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 700% more volatile than AMSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MD or THC or NKTR or AMSF or HCA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCA Healthcare, Inc.
(HCA) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. grew EPS 263. 0% year-over-year, compared to -52. 6% for Tenet Healthcare Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCA leads at 7. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MD or THC or NKTR or AMSF or HCA?
AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 9% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMSF leads at 18. 6% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MD or THC or NKTR or AMSF or HCA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Tenet Healthcare Corporation (THC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 33x versus HCA Healthcare, Inc. 's 0. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. (MD) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for AMERISAFE, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKTR: 59. 3% to $132. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — MD or THC or NKTR or AMSF or HCA?
In this comparison, AMSF (8.
4% yield), HCA (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. MD, THC, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MD or THC or NKTR or AMSF or HCA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HCA Healthcare, Inc.
(HCA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 0. 7% yield, +450. 5% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCA: +450. 5%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MD and THC and NKTR and AMSF and HCA?
These companies operate in different sectors (MD (Healthcare) and THC (Healthcare) and NKTR (Healthcare) and AMSF (Financial Services) and HCA (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MD is a small-cap deep-value stock; THC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMSF is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. AMSF, HCA pay a dividend while MD, THC, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.