Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MDXG vs MASI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
MDXG vs MASI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $548M | $9.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $389M | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $76M |
| Gross Margin | 81.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | 19.9% |
| Forward P/E | 295.2x | 32.5x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $559M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $166M | $152M |
MDXG vs MASI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
| Masimo Corporation (MASI) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDXG vs MASI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MDXG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 14.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 4.32x
- 20.0% revenue growth vs MASI's -27.1%
MASI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.63
- 282.9% 10Y total return vs MDXG's -48.5%
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.49x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs MASI's -27.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (32.5x vs 295.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.9% margin vs MASI's 4.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs MDXG's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.9% vs MDXG's -47.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs MASI's 4.0%, ROIC 42.3% vs 16.5% |
MDXG vs MASI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MDXG vs MASI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MDXG and MASI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MASI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 4.0x MDXG's $389M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.9% (MDXG) to 4.9% (MASI). On growth, MASI holds the edge at +8.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $389M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $53M | $340M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | $76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | $211M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +19.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.1% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | +134.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MDXG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MDXG's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MASI's 27.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $548M | $9.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $405M | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.53x | -63.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 295.20x | 32.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.14x | 27.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.31x | 6.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.15x | 13.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.51x | 47.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for MASI. MDXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MASI's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MASI scores 6/9 vs MDXG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.7% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +42.3% | +16.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.7% | +18.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$144M | $407M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $166M | $152M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $559M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 25.32x | 12.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MASI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MASI five years ago would be worth $7,963 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,712 for MDXG. Over the past 12 months, MASI leads with a +18.9% total return vs MDXG's -47.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MASI at -1.7% vs MDXG's -14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -43.1% | +40.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.1% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.6% | -4.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.9% | -20.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.5% | +282.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.1% | -1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MASI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MASI is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MDXG's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MASI currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs MDXG's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.99 | $179.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.02 | $125.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.2% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MDXG as "Buy" and MASI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 171.0% upside for MDXG (target: $10) vs 5.0% for MASI (target: $188).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $187.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +3.9% |
MDXG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MASI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
MDXG vs MASI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDXG or MASI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 1% for Masimo Corporation (MASI). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (295. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MDXG or MASI?
On forward P/E, Masimo Corporation is actually cheaper at 32.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MDXG or MASI?
Over the past 5 years, Masimo Corporation (MASI) delivered a total return of -20.
4%, compared to -62. 9% for MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MASI returned +282. 9% versus MDXG's -48. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MDXG or MASI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Masimo Corporation (MASI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus MiMedx Group, Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning MDXG is approximately 94% more volatile than MASI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 78% for Masimo Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MDXG or MASI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -27. 1% for Masimo Corporation (MASI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Masimo Corporation grew EPS 51. 0% year-over-year, compared to 14. 3% for MiMedx Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDXG leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MDXG or MASI?
MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 6% net margin versus -9. 9% for Masimo Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MASI leads at 20. 5% versus 15. 3% for MDXG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDXG leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MDXG or MASI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Masimo Corporation (MASI) trades at 32.
5x forward P/E versus 295. 2x for MiMedx Group, Inc. — 262. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDXG: 171. 0% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MDXG or MASI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MDXG or MASI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Masimo Corporation (MASI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), +282. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MASI: +282. 9%, MDXG: -48. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MDXG and MASI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; MASI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.