Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MEC vs KFRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
MEC vs KFRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $474M | $769M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $556M | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.1% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 195.7x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $2M |
MEC vs KFRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mayville Engineerin… (MEC) | 100 | 381.5 | +281.5% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 139.2 | +39.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MEC vs KFRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MEC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +77.4% vs KFRC's +16.7%
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.7%
- Rev growth -5.4%, EPS growth -25.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.1%
- 187.9% 10Y total return vs MEC's 41.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.4% revenue growth vs MEC's -6.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.5x vs 195.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs MEC's -2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs MEC's 1.18 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.4% vs KFRC's +16.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs MEC's -3.0%, ROIC 19.1% vs -0.9% |
MEC vs KFRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MEC vs KFRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KFRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.4x MEC's $556M. KFRC is the more profitable business, keeping 2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MEC's -2.9%. On growth, MEC holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $556M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MEC and KFRC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MEC's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $474M | $769M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $499M | $836M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -58.38x | 21.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 195.73x | 17.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.31x | 15.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.99x | 6.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.63x | 16.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-7 for MEC. MEC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFRC's 0.56x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.8% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.32x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEC five years ago would be worth $14,299 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,200 for KFRC. Over the past 12 months, MEC leads with a +77.4% total return vs KFRC's +16.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEC at 34.3% vs KFRC's -5.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.2% | +35.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.4% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.5% | -15.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.0% | -18.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.8% | +187.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.3% | -5.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MEC and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MEC's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MEC currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs KFRC's 88.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.38 | $47.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.10 | $24.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +88.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.8 | 71.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 160K | 307K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MEC as "Buy" and KFRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 68.9% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -7.9% for MEC (target: $22). KFRC is the only dividend payer here at 3.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.50 | $71.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +6.6% |
KFRC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MEC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MEC vs KFRC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MEC or KFRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger pick with -5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 0% for Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. (MEC). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. (MEC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MEC or KFRC?
On forward P/E, Kforce Inc.
is actually cheaper at 17. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MEC or KFRC?
Over the past 5 years, Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.
(MEC) delivered a total return of +43. 0%, compared to -18. 0% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +187. 9% versus MEC's +41. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MEC or KFRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning MEC is approximately 123% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. (MEC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 56% for Kforce Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MEC or KFRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is pulling ahead at -5. 4% versus -6. 0% for Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. (MEC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kforce Inc. grew EPS -25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -132. 3% for Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEC leads at 0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MEC or KFRC?
Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus -1. 5% for Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KFRC leads at 3. 8% versus -0. 7% for MEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFRC leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MEC or KFRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 195. 7x for Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. — 178. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 68. 9% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MEC or KFRC?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MEC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MEC or KFRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 7% yield, +187. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +187. 9%, MEC: +41. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MEC and KFRC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KFRC pays a dividend while MEC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare KFRC vs KELYA
KELYA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to KFRC.
Compare MEC vs TWIN
TWIN is one of the most direct listed alternatives to MEC.
Expand With KELYA + HSII
KELYA and HSII are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.