Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $341M | $1.77B | $5.37B | $11.57B | $78.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $978M | $556M | $768M | $453M | $2.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-64M | $69M | $3M | $119M | $616M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 38.7% | 48.0% | 57.3% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.6% | 15.9% | 6.9% | 18.1% | 26.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.4x | 27.3x | 92.5x | 67.2x |
| Total Debt | $343M | $122M | $39M | $13M | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $82M | $216M | $403M | $1.10B |
MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methode Electronics… (MEI) | 100 | 30.7 | -69.3% |
| CTS Corporation (CTS) | 100 | 289.4 | +189.4% |
| Kulicke and Soffa I… (KLIC) | 100 | 459.1 | +359.1% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 420.6 | +320.6% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 763.2 | +663.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MEI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 6.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.63 vs MPWR's 2.28
- Lower P/E (25.4x vs 67.2x), PEG 1.63 vs 2.28
- Beta 1.46 vs VICR's 2.87
KLIC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.86, yield 1.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.86, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 4.79x
- Beta 1.86, yield 1.0%, current ratio 4.79x
VICR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
- 26.5% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 25.3%
- 26.2% margin vs MEI's -6.6%
- +5.2% vs MEI's +39.3%
MPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 26.4% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.4x vs 67.2x), PEG 1.63 vs 2.28 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.2% margin vs MEI's -6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.46 vs VICR's 2.87 | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs MEI's +39.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs MEI's -5.6%, ROIC 8.9% vs -1.9% |
MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CTS leads 2 • MEI leads 0 • KLIC leads 0 • MPWR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 6.2x VICR's $453M. VICR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MEI's -6.6%. On growth, KLIC holds the edge at +49.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $978M | $556M | $768M | $453M | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $123M | $61M | $103M | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$64M | $69M | $3M | $119M | $616M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $88M | $4M | $119M | $664M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +38.7% | +48.0% | +57.3% | +55.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +15.9% | +6.9% | +18.1% | +26.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +12.4% | +0.4% | +26.2% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +15.8% | +0.6% | +26.3% | +23.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +10.9% | +49.8% | +11.5% | +20.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +34.1% | +141.5% | +3.4% | -88.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CTS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.2x trailing earnings, CTS trades at a 100% valuation discount to KLIC's 9999.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CTS offers better value at 1.81x vs MPWR's 4.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $341M | $1.8B | $5.4B | $11.6B | $78.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $581M | $1.8B | $5.2B | $11.2B | $77.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.47x | 28.20x | 9999.00x | 98.26x | 125.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.41x | 27.28x | 92.55x | 67.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.81x | — | 2.19x | 4.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.78x | 15.13x | 352.22x | 194.00x | 99.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 3.26x | 8.21x | 28.37x | 28.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.49x | 3.34x | 6.65x | 16.19x | 21.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.44x | 55.75x | 97.02x | 118.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VICR and MPWR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VICR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MEI. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MEI's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTS scores 7/9 vs MEI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +12.5% | +0.4% | +18.7% | +17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.6% | +8.9% | +0.3% | +16.6% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +11.1% | -0.3% | +8.9% | +22.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +12.8% | -0.3% | +5.7% | +20.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 0.22x | 0.05x | 0.02x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $240M | $40M | -$177M | -$390M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $82M | $216M | $403M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $343M | $122M | $39M | $13M | $24M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.63x | 18.18x | 4872.17x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $50,422 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,628 for MEI. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +524.2% total return vs MEI's +39.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 81.4% vs MEI's -35.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.2% | +40.9% | +112.8% | +119.5% | +71.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.3% | +54.7% | +226.2% | +524.2% | +151.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.1% | +49.1% | +124.6% | +496.6% | +286.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.7% | +93.8% | +130.0% | +218.0% | +404.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.6% | +264.1% | +853.9% | +2651.8% | +2534.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.5% | +14.2% | +31.0% | +81.4% | +56.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs VICR's 87.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.09x | 1.46x | 1.86x | 2.87x | 2.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.78 | $62.06 | $107.01 | $293.95 | $1662.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.88 | $36.03 | $30.97 | $40.54 | $630.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.3% | +99.5% | +95.9% | +87.2% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.3 | 70.2 | 80.6 | 59.9 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 495K | 211K | 633K | 860K | 578K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MEI and MPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MEI as "Hold", CTS as "Hold", KLIC as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.9% upside for MPWR (target: $1615) vs -39.1% for KLIC (target: $63). For income investors, MEI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.97% vs CTS's 0.26%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.50 | — | $62.50 | $245.00 | $1615.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 4 | 11 | 7 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.0% | +0.3% | +1.0% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | $0.16 | $1.02 | — | $5.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +0.3% | +0.0% |
VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CTS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). CTS Corporation (CTS) offers the better valuation at 28. 2x trailing P/E (25. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?
On trailing P/E, CTS Corporation (CTS) is the cheapest at 28.
2x versus Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, CTS Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CTS Corporation wins at 1. 63x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +404. 2%, compared to -73. 7% for Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +26. 5% versus MEI's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CTS Corporation (CTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
46β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 87β — meaning VICR is approximately 97% more volatile than CTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 50% for Methode Electronics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -6. 0% for Methode Electronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -2. 3% for MEI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CTS Corporation (CTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 63x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, CTS Corporation (CTS) trades at 25. 4x forward P/E versus 92. 5x for Vicor Corporation — 67. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPWR: 0. 9% to $1615. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?
In this comparison, MEI (6.
0% yield), KLIC (1. 0% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield), CTS (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. VICR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +853. 9% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KLIC: +853. 9%, MPWR: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MEI and CTS and KLIC and VICR and MPWR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MEI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KLIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. MEI, KLIC pay a dividend while CTS, VICR, MPWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.