Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MEI
Methode Electronics, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$341M
5Y Perf.-69.3%
CTS
CTS Corporation

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.77B
5Y Perf.+189.4%
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$5.37B
5Y Perf.+359.1%
VICR
Vicor Corporation

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.57B
5Y Perf.+320.6%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$78.63B
5Y Perf.+663.2%

MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MEI logoMEI
CTS logoCTS
KLIC logoKLIC
VICR logoVICR
MPWR logoMPWR
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductorsHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductors
Market Cap$341M$1.77B$5.37B$11.57B$78.63B
Revenue (TTM)$978M$556M$768M$453M$2.79B
Net Income (TTM)$-64M$69M$3M$119M$616M
Gross Margin15.3%38.7%48.0%57.3%55.2%
Operating Margin-2.6%15.9%6.9%18.1%26.1%
Forward P/E25.4x27.3x92.5x67.2x
Total Debt$343M$122M$39M$13M$24M
Cash & Equiv.$104M$82M$216M$403M$1.10B

MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MEI
CTS
KLIC
VICR
MPWR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Methode Electronics… (MEI)10030.7-69.3%
CTS Corporation (CTS)100289.4+189.4%
Kulicke and Soffa I… (KLIC)100459.1+359.1%
Vicor Corporation (VICR)100420.6+320.6%
Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR)100763.2+663.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: VICR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. CTS Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. MEI and MPWR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MEI
Methode Electronics, Inc.
The Income Pick

MEI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 6.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: dividends
CTS
CTS Corporation
The Value Pick

CTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 1.63 vs MPWR's 2.28
  • Lower P/E (25.4x vs 67.2x), PEG 1.63 vs 2.28
  • Beta 1.46 vs VICR's 2.87
Best for: valuation efficiency
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick

KLIC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.86, yield 1.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.86, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 4.79x
  • Beta 1.86, yield 1.0%, current ratio 4.79x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
VICR
Vicor Corporation
The Growth Play

VICR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
  • 26.5% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 25.3%
  • 26.2% margin vs MEI's -6.6%
  • +5.2% vs MEI's +39.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
The Growth Leader

MPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 26.4% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4%
Best for: growth
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMPWR logoMPWR26.4% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4%
ValueCTS logoCTSLower P/E (25.4x vs 67.2x), PEG 1.63 vs 2.28
Quality / MarginsVICR logoVICR26.2% margin vs MEI's -6.6%
Stability / SafetyCTS logoCTSBeta 1.46 vs VICR's 2.87
DividendsMEI logoMEI6.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)VICR logoVICR+5.2% vs MEI's +39.3%
Efficiency (ROA)VICR logoVICR16.6% ROA vs MEI's -5.6%, ROIC 8.9% vs -1.9%

MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MEIMethode Electronics, Inc.
FY 2025
Industrial
45.7%$527M
Automotive
45.2%$522M
Corporate And Intersegment Elimination
4.6%$53M
Interface
4.5%$52M
CTSCTS Corporation
FY 2012
Components and Sensors Segment
52.8%$304M
EMS Segment
47.2%$272M
KLICKulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
FY 2024
Ball Bonding Equipment Segment
52.9%$358M
Aftermarket Products and Services (APS) Segment
23.7%$160M
Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment
15.6%$106M
Advanced Solutions Segment
7.8%$53M
VICRVicor Corporation
FY 2025
AdvancedProducts
61.0%$249M
BrickProducts
39.0%$159M
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems, Inc.
FY 2023
DC To DC Products
94.4%$1.7B
Lighting Control Products
5.6%$102M

MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCTSLAGGINGMPWR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

VICR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 6.2x VICR's $453M. VICR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MEI's -6.6%. On growth, KLIC holds the edge at +49.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMEI logoMEIMethode Electroni…CTS logoCTSCTS CorporationKLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$978M$556M$768M$453M$2.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$10M$123M$61M$103M$781M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$64M$69M$3M$119M$616M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$43M$88M$4M$119M$664M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+15.3%+38.7%+48.0%+57.3%+55.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.6%+15.9%+6.9%+18.1%+26.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.6%+12.4%+0.4%+26.2%+22.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.4%+15.8%+0.6%+26.3%+23.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.6%+10.9%+49.8%+11.5%+20.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.4%+34.1%+141.5%+3.4%-88.4%
VICR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CTS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 28.2x trailing earnings, CTS trades at a 100% valuation discount to KLIC's 9999.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CTS offers better value at 1.81x vs MPWR's 4.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMEI logoMEIMethode Electroni…CTS logoCTSCTS CorporationKLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Market CapShares × price$341M$1.8B$5.4B$11.6B$78.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$581M$1.8B$5.2B$11.2B$77.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.47x28.20x9999.00x98.26x125.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.41x27.28x92.55x67.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.81x2.19x4.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.78x15.13x352.22x194.00x99.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.33x3.26x8.21x28.37x28.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.49x3.34x6.65x16.19x21.90x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.44x55.75x97.02x118.03x
CTS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — VICR and MPWR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

VICR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MEI. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MEI's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTS scores 7/9 vs MEI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMEI logoMEIMethode Electroni…CTS logoCTSCTS CorporationKLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.4%+12.5%+0.4%+18.7%+17.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.6%+8.9%+0.3%+16.6%+15.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.9%+11.1%-0.3%+8.9%+22.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.1%+12.8%-0.3%+5.7%+20.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.50x0.22x0.05x0.02x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$240M$40M-$177M-$390M-$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$104M$82M$216M$403M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$343M$122M$39M$13M$24M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.63x18.18x4872.17x
Evenly matched — VICR and MPWR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $50,422 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,628 for MEI. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +524.2% total return vs MEI's +39.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 81.4% vs MEI's -35.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMEI logoMEIMethode Electroni…CTS logoCTSCTS CorporationKLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+45.2%+40.9%+112.8%+119.5%+71.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+39.3%+54.7%+226.2%+524.2%+151.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.1%+49.1%+124.6%+496.6%+286.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.7%+93.8%+130.0%+218.0%+404.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-51.6%+264.1%+853.9%+2651.8%+2534.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-35.5%+14.2%+31.0%+81.4%+56.9%
VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs VICR's 87.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMEI logoMEIMethode Electroni…CTS logoCTSCTS CorporationKLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.09x1.46x1.86x2.87x2.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.78$62.06$107.01$293.95$1662.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.88$36.03$30.97$40.54$630.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.3%+99.5%+95.9%+87.2%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10073.370.280.659.961.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded495K211K633K860K578K
CTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MEI and MPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MEI as "Hold", CTS as "Hold", KLIC as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.9% upside for MPWR (target: $1615) vs -39.1% for KLIC (target: $63). For income investors, MEI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.97% vs CTS's 0.26%.

MetricMEI logoMEIMethode Electroni…CTS logoCTSCTS CorporationKLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationMPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.50$62.50$245.00$1615.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts6411725
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.0%+0.3%+1.0%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises21508
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.57$0.16$1.02$5.90
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%+3.2%+1.8%+0.3%+0.0%
Evenly matched — MEI and MPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CTS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallCTS Corporation (CTS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MEI vs CTS vs KLIC vs VICR vs MPWR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). CTS Corporation (CTS) offers the better valuation at 28. 2x trailing P/E (25. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?

On trailing P/E, CTS Corporation (CTS) is the cheapest at 28.

2x versus Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, CTS Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CTS Corporation wins at 1. 63x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?

Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) delivered a total return of +404. 2%, compared to -73. 7% for Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +26. 5% versus MEI's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CTS Corporation (CTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

46β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 87β — meaning VICR is approximately 97% more volatile than CTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 50% for Methode Electronics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?

Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.

1% net margin versus -6. 0% for Methode Electronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -2. 3% for MEI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, CTS Corporation (CTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 63x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, CTS Corporation (CTS) trades at 25. 4x forward P/E versus 92. 5x for Vicor Corporation — 67. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPWR: 0. 9% to $1615. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR?

In this comparison, MEI (6.

0% yield), KLIC (1. 0% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield), CTS (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. VICR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MEI or CTS or KLIC or VICR or MPWR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.

(KLIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +853. 9% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KLIC: +853. 9%, MPWR: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MEI and CTS and KLIC and VICR and MPWR?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MEI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KLIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. MEI, KLIC pay a dividend while CTS, VICR, MPWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MEI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 2.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CTS

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KLIC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VICR

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MPWR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MEI and CTS and KLIC and VICR and MPWR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MEI: -2.6% · CTS: 10.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.