Chemicals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MEOH vs BE vs PLUG vs OLN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Chemicals - Specialty
MEOH vs BE vs PLUG vs OLN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $4.82B | $68.63B | $4.61B | $3.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.59B | $2.45B | $710M | $6.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $80M | $6M | $-1.63B | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | 31.1% | 99.8% | 7.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.9% | 8.2% | 38.1% | 0.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.3x | 136.4x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $3.50B | $2.99B | $997M | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $428M | $2.45B | $1M | $168M |
MEOH vs BE vs PLUG vs OLN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methanex Corporation (MEOH) | 100 | 387.2 | +287.2% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 3555.0 | +3455.0% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 78.6 | -21.4% |
| Olin Corporation (OLN) | 100 | 239.4 | +139.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MEOH vs BE vs PLUG vs OLN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MEOH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, current ratio 2.06x
- Beta 0.39, yield 1.2%, current ratio 2.06x
- Better valuation composite
BE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs MEOH's 126.3%
- 37.3% revenue growth vs MEOH's -3.5%
- +16.5% vs OLN's +44.6%
PLUG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
OLN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.3% revenue growth vs MEOH's -3.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.2% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs OLN's 2.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.5% vs OLN's +44.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 6.6% vs 10.9% |
MEOH vs BE vs PLUG vs OLN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MEOH vs BE vs PLUG vs OLN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEOH leads in 2 of 6 categories
BE leads 1 • PLUG leads 0 • OLN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MEOH and BE and PLUG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 9.6x PLUG's $710M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.2% (MEOH) to -2.3% (PLUG). On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $2.4B | $710M | $6.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $909M | $240M | -$1.5B | $538M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $80M | $6M | -$1.6B | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $748M | $233M | -$2M | $248M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +31.1% | +99.8% | +7.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +8.2% | +38.1% | +0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +0.2% | -2.3% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +9.5% | -0.3% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +130.4% | +17.6% | -0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +3.3% | +95.9% | -9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MEOH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MEOH's 8.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 560.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $68.6B | $4.6B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $69.2B | $5.6B | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 66.35x | -771.54x | — | -77.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.34x | 136.38x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.69x | 560.66x | — | 10.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.34x | 33.91x | 6.49x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.66x | 86.55x | — | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.59x | 1200.02x | — | 13.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEOH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEOH delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. MEOH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEOH scores 5/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | +0.8% | -124.4% | -2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.2% | -64.3% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +4.1% | +10.9% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +2.5% | +18.6% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | 3.77x | 19.75x | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $538M | $996M | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $428M | $2.5B | $1M | $168M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.5B | $3.0B | $997M | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.93x | 1.05x | -36.18x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $128,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,467 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1647.1% total return vs OLN's +44.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 156.3% vs PLUG's -29.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +53.5% | +189.3% | +48.4% | +34.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +95.1% | +1647.1% | +320.2% | +44.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | +1584.2% | -64.4% | -43.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.1% | +1183.6% | -85.3% | -29.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.3% | +1041.9% | +72.4% | +67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +156.3% | -29.1% | -17.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MEOH and OLN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MEOH is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OLN currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs PLUG's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 3.61x | 2.57x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.75 | $302.99 | $4.58 | $30.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.57 | $16.05 | $0.69 | $18.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +94.2% | +72.3% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 77.9 | 63.5 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 10.1M | 76.7M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MEOH and OLN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MEOH as "Buy", BE as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", OLN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.1% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs -34.3% for BE (target: $188). For income investors, OLN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.78% vs MEOH's 1.20%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.75 | $187.56 | $3.91 | $24.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 31 | 38 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.0% | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.75 | $0.00 | — | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
MEOH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
MEOH vs BE vs PLUG vs OLN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MEOH or BE or PLUG or OLN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger pick with 37.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 5% for Methanex Corporation (MEOH). Methanex Corporation (MEOH) offers the better valuation at 66. 4x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Methanex Corporation (MEOH) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MEOH or BE or PLUG or OLN?
On forward P/E, Methanex Corporation is actually cheaper at 8.
3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MEOH or BE or PLUG or OLN?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1184%, compared to -85.
3% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +1042% versus OLN's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MEOH or BE or PLUG or OLN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 823% more volatile than MEOH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 129% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MEOH or BE or PLUG or OLN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is pulling ahead at 37.
3% versus -3. 5% for Methanex Corporation (MEOH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MEOH or BE or PLUG or OLN?
Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
2% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus 1. 7% for OLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MEOH or BE or PLUG or OLN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) trades at 8.
3x forward P/E versus 136. 4x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 128. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLUG: 18. 1% to $3. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — MEOH or BE or PLUG or OLN?
In this comparison, OLN (2.
8% yield), MEOH (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BE, PLUG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MEOH or BE or PLUG or OLN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
39), 1. 2% yield, +126. 3% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEOH: +126. 3%, PLUG: +72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MEOH and BE and PLUG and OLN?
These companies operate in different sectors (MEOH (Basic Materials) and BE (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials) and OLN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MEOH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MEOH, OLN pay a dividend while BE, PLUG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.