MEOH
Methanex Corporation
Chemicals
Market Cap$4.75B
5Y Perf.+281.0%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MEOH vs HUN vs DOW vs OLN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
Chemicals
Market Cap$2.56B
5Y Perf.-18.8%
DOW
Dow Inc.
Chemicals
Market Cap$26.86B
5Y Perf.-3.3%
OLN
Olin Corporation
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+122.4%
MEOH vs HUN vs DOW vs OLN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MEOH | HUN | DOW | OLN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $4.75B | $2.56B | $26.86B | $3.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.59B | $5.69B | $39.33B | $6.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $80M | $-324M | $-2.76B | $-127M |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | 12.9% | 6.2% | 5.3% |
| Operating Margin | 12.9% | -1.0% | -2.3% | -1.6% |
| Forward P/E | 8.2x | — | 12.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $3.50B | $2.73B | $19.60B | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $428M | $429M | $3.82B | $168M |
MEOH vs HUN vs DOW vs OLN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MEOH
HUN
DOW
OLN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methanex Corporation (MEOH) | 100 | 381.0 | +281.0% |
| Huntsman Corporation (HUN) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Dow Inc. (DOW) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| Olin Corporation (OLN) | 100 | 222.4 | +122.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MEOH vs HUN vs DOW vs OLN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MEOH leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Olin Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MEOH
Methanex Corporation
The Income Pick
MEOH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth -3.5%, EPS growth -60.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.9%
- 135.7% 10Y total return vs OLN's 61.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, current ratio 2.06x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
The Income Angle
HUN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: basic materials exposure
DOW
Dow Inc.
The Income Angle
DOW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: basic materials exposure
OLN
Olin Corporation
The Growth Leader
OLN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 3.7% revenue growth vs DOW's -7.0%
Best for: growth
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OLN | 3.7% revenue growth vs DOW's -7.0% |
| Value | MEOH | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | MEOH | 2.2% margin vs DOW's -7.0% |
| Stability / Safety | MEOH | Beta 0.39 vs HUN's 1.73 |
| Dividends | MEOH | 1.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HUN's 5.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MEOH | +91.9% vs OLN's +35.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MEOH | 1.1% ROA vs DOW's -4.6%, ROIC 6.6% vs 0.6% |
MEOH vs HUN vs DOW vs OLN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
MEOH vs HUN vs DOW vs OLN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMEOHLAGGINGOLN
Who Leads Where
MEOH leads in 4 of 6 categories
HUN leads 0 • DOW leads 0 • OLN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓OLNOlin Corporation
0leads
DOWDow Inc.
0leads
HUNHuntsman Corporation
0leads
MEOHMethanex Corporation
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HUNvs DOWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MEOH5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MEOH3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MEOH6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MEOH5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 11.0x MEOH's $3.6B. MEOH is the more profitable business, keeping 2.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOW's -7.0%. On growth, MEOH holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MEOHMethanex Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $5.7B | $39.3B | $6.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $909M | $160M | $1.3B | $284M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $80M | -$324M | -$2.8B | -$127M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $748M | $135M | -$2.0B | $352M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +12.9% | +6.2% | +5.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | -1.0% | -2.3% | -1.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | -5.7% | -7.0% | -1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +2.4% | -5.1% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +0.7% | -6.1% | -3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -3.3% | -68.2% | -61.8% |
MEOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MEOH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MEOH's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUN's 19.6x.
| Metric | MEOHMethanex Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $2.6B | $26.9B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $4.9B | $42.6B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 65.30x | -9.27x | -10.11x | -72.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.21x | — | 12.62x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.60x | 19.64x | 13.78x | 9.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.32x | 0.45x | 0.67x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.64x | 0.86x | 1.52x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.49x | 22.11x | — | 12.29x |
MEOH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEOH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEOH delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-15 for DOW. HUN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.92x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OLN's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEOH scores 5/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MEOHMethanex Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | -8.1% | -15.4% | -6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | -4.6% | -4.6% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | -0.6% | +0.6% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | -0.7% | +0.5% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | 0.92x | 1.12x | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $2.3B | $15.8B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $428M | $429M | $3.8B | $168M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.5B | $2.7B | $19.6B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.93x | -1.08x | -1.51x | 0.66x |
MEOH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEOH five years ago would be worth $16,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,018 for HUN. Over the past 12 months, MEOH leads with a +91.9% total return vs OLN's +35.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEOH at 12.8% vs OLN's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MEOHMethanex Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.1% | +45.5% | +55.2% | +25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +91.9% | +37.5% | +37.3% | +35.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.6% | -33.3% | -17.5% | -46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.2% | -39.8% | -27.2% | -33.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.7% | +57.6% | +12.2% | +61.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.8% | -12.6% | -6.2% | -19.0% |
MEOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MEOH and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MEOH is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUN's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUN currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs DOW's 87.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MEOHMethanex Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 1.73x | 0.76x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.75 | $15.89 | $42.74 | $30.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.57 | $7.30 | $20.40 | $18.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.0% | +92.7% | +87.3% | +87.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 65.4 | 48.9 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 6.2M | 14.4M | 2.7M |
Evenly matched — MEOH and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MEOH and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MEOH as "Buy", HUN as "Hold", DOW as "Hold", OLN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.0% upside for DOW (target: $40) vs -18.6% for HUN (target: $12). For income investors, HUN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.74% vs MEOH's 1.22%.
| Metric | MEOHMethanex Corporat… | HUNHuntsman Corporat… | DOWDow Inc. | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.75 | $12.00 | $39.55 | $24.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 33 | 35 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +5.7% | +5.6% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.75 | $0.85 | $2.09 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +1.7% |
Evenly matched — MEOH and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MEOH leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallMethanex Corporation (MEOH)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MEOH vs HUN vs DOW vs OLN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MEOH or HUN or DOW or OLN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Dow Inc. (DOW). Methanex Corporation (MEOH) offers the better valuation at 65. 3x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Methanex Corporation (MEOH) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MEOH or HUN or DOW or OLN?
On forward P/E, Methanex Corporation is actually cheaper at 8.
2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MEOH or HUN or DOW or OLN?
Over the past 5 years, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) delivered a total return of +62.
2%, compared to -39. 8% for Huntsman Corporation (HUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEOH returned +135. 7% versus DOW's +12. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MEOH or HUN or DOW or OLN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Huntsman Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning HUN is approximately 344% more volatile than MEOH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Huntsman Corporation (HUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 176% for Olin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MEOH or HUN or DOW or OLN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Olin Corporation (OLN) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus -7. 0% for Dow Inc. (DOW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huntsman Corporation grew EPS -44. 5% year-over-year, compared to -335. 0% for Dow Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEOH leads at -5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MEOH or HUN or DOW or OLN?
Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
2% net margin versus -6. 6% for Dow Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEOH leads at 12. 9% versus -0. 7% for HUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MEOH leads at 25. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MEOH or HUN or DOW or OLN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) trades at 8.
2x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Dow Inc. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOW: 6. 0% to $39. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — MEOH or HUN or DOW or OLN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 1. 2% for Methanex Corporation (MEOH).
09Is MEOH or HUN or DOW or OLN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
39), 1. 2% yield, +135. 7% 10Y return). Huntsman Corporation (HUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEOH: +135. 7%, HUN: +57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MEOH and HUN and DOW and OLN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MEOH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DOW is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; OLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MEOH: 2.1% · HUN: 0.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.