MEOH vs OLN

For growth investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger pick with 3.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 5% for Methanex Corporation (MEOH). Methanex Corporation (MEOH) offers the better valuation at 66. 4x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Methanex Corporation (MEOH) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) delivered a total return of +66.

1%, compared to -29. 4% for Olin Corporation (OLN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEOH returned +126. 3% versus OLN's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

39β versus Olin Corporation's 1. 47β — meaning OLN is approximately 277% more volatile than MEOH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 129% versus 176% for Olin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Olin Corporation (OLN) is pulling ahead at 3.

7% versus -3. 5% for Methanex Corporation (MEOH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Methanex Corporation grew EPS -60. 7% year-over-year, compared to -140. 7% for Olin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEOH leads at -5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

2% net margin versus -0. 6% for Olin Corporation — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEOH leads at 12. 9% versus 1. 7% for OLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MEOH leads at 25. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MEOH: -1.

0% to $61. 75.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Olin Corporation (OLN) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 2% for Methanex Corporation (MEOH).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

39), 1. 2% yield, +126. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEOH: +126. 3%, OLN: +67. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.