Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MEOH vs TROX vs EMN vs HUN vs AVNT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MEOH
Methanex Corporation

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$4.75B
5Y Perf.+273.6%
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.34B
5Y Perf.+32.8%
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.43B
5Y Perf.+8.2%
HUN
Huntsman Corporation

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.56B
5Y Perf.-17.6%
AVNT
Avient Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.35B
5Y Perf.+48.9%

MEOH vs TROX vs EMN vs HUN vs AVNT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MEOH logoMEOH
TROX logoTROX
EMN logoEMN
HUN logoHUN
AVNT logoAVNT
IndustryChemicalsChemicalsChemicals - SpecialtyChemicalsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$4.75B$1.34B$8.43B$2.56B$3.35B
Revenue (TTM)$3.59B$2.92B$8.64B$5.69B$3.28B
Net Income (TTM)$80M$-359M$399M$-324M$158M
Gross Margin25.3%5.8%19.8%12.9%31.7%
Operating Margin12.9%-4.8%9.4%-1.0%9.3%
Forward P/E6.7x12.5x12.0x
Total Debt$3.50B$3.59B$5.08B$2.73B$1.92B
Cash & Equiv.$428M$211M$566M$429M$511M

MEOH vs TROX vs EMN vs HUN vs AVNTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MEOH
TROX
EMN
HUN
AVNT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Methanex Corporation (MEOH)100373.6+273.6%
Tronox Holdings plc (TROX)100132.8+32.8%
Eastman Chemical Co… (EMN)100108.2+8.2%
Huntsman Corporation (HUN)10082.4-17.6%
Avient Corporation (AVNT)100148.9+48.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MEOH vs TROX vs EMN vs HUN vs AVNT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MEOH leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Avient Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. EMN and HUN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MEOH
Methanex Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

MEOH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 135.7% 10Y total return vs TROX's 116.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, current ratio 2.06x
  • Beta 0.39, yield 1.2%, current ratio 2.06x
  • Lower P/E (6.7x vs 12.0x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, TROX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
The Income Pick

EMN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.36, yield 4.5%
  • 2.6% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 6.7% vs -0.3%
Best for: income & stability
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
The Income Pick

HUN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 5.7% yield, vs AVNT's 2.9%
Best for: dividends
AVNT
Avient Corporation
The Growth Play

AVNT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth -51.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.4%
  • 0.6% revenue growth vs EMN's -6.7%
  • 4.8% margin vs TROX's -12.3%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAVNT logoAVNT0.6% revenue growth vs EMN's -6.7%
ValueMEOH logoMEOHLower P/E (6.7x vs 12.0x)
Quality / MarginsAVNT logoAVNT4.8% margin vs TROX's -12.3%
Stability / SafetyMEOH logoMEOHBeta 0.39 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage
DividendsHUN logoHUN5.7% yield, vs AVNT's 2.9%
Momentum (1Y)MEOH logoMEOH+91.9% vs EMN's +2.3%
Efficiency (ROA)EMN logoEMN2.6% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 6.7% vs -0.3%

MEOH vs TROX vs EMN vs HUN vs AVNT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MEOHMethanex Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

TROXTronox Holdings plc
FY 2025
TiO2
79.3%$2.3B
Product and Service, Other
11.2%$326M
Zircon
9.5%$274M
EMNEastman Chemical Company
FY 2025
Advanced Materials
33.0%$2.9B
Additives And Functional Products
33.0%$2.9B
Chemical Intermediates
22.0%$1.9B
Fibers
12.0%$1.1B
HUNHuntsman Corporation
FY 2025
Diversified
82.1%$4.7B
Specialty
17.1%$975M
Product and Service, Other
0.8%$46M
AVNTAvient Corporation
FY 2025
Color Additives And Inks
62.3%$2.0B
Specialty Engineered Materials
37.7%$1.2B

MEOH vs TROX vs EMN vs HUN vs AVNT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMEOHLAGGINGHUN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AVNT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

EMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.6B annually — 3.0x TROX's $2.9B. AVNT is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, TROX holds the edge at +3.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …HUN logoHUNHuntsman Corporat…AVNT logoAVNTAvient Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.6B$2.9B$8.6B$5.7B$3.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$909M$166M$1.2B$160M$445M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$80M-$359M$399M-$324M$158M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$748M-$139M$498M$135M$205M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.3%+5.8%+19.8%+12.9%+31.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.9%-4.8%+9.4%-1.0%+9.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.2%-12.3%+4.6%-5.7%+4.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.8%-4.8%+5.8%+2.4%+6.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.1%+3.0%-4.9%+0.7%+2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.5%+7.1%-40.8%-3.3%+3.8%
AVNT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MEOH and HUN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.0x trailing earnings, EMN trades at a 72% valuation discount to MEOH's 65.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MEOH's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUN's 19.6x.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …HUN logoHUNHuntsman Corporat…AVNT logoAVNTAvient Corporation
Market CapShares × price$4.7B$1.3B$8.4B$2.6B$3.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.8B$4.7B$12.9B$4.9B$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS65.30x-2.83x17.97x-9.27x41.01x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.74x12.50x11.95x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate5.59x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.60x16.80x8.96x19.64x12.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.32x0.46x0.96x0.45x1.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.64x0.92x1.41x0.86x1.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.49x19.87x22.11x17.16x
Evenly matched — MEOH and HUN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — EMN and AVNT each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

EMN delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. AVNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.81x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEOH scores 5/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …HUN logoHUNHuntsman Corporat…AVNT logoAVNTAvient Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.9%-30.4%+6.7%-8.1%+6.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%-7.7%+2.6%-4.6%+2.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.6%-0.3%+6.7%-0.6%+3.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.5%-0.4%+7.5%-0.7%+4.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952525
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.29x2.48x0.84x0.92x0.81x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.1B$3.4B$4.5B$2.3B$1.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$428M$211M$566M$429M$511M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.5B$3.6B$5.1B$2.7B$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.93x-1.16x2.22x-1.08x3.61x
Evenly matched — EMN and AVNT each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MEOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MEOH five years ago would be worth $16,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,493 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, MEOH leads with a +91.9% total return vs EMN's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEOH at 12.8% vs HUN's -12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …HUN logoHUNHuntsman Corporat…AVNT logoAVNTAvient Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+51.1%+98.1%+15.8%+45.5%+16.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+91.9%+76.9%+2.3%+37.5%+4.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+43.6%-23.6%+3.4%-33.3%+2.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.2%-55.1%-28.4%-39.8%-22.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+135.7%+116.1%+35.4%+57.6%+27.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.8%-8.6%+1.1%-12.6%+0.8%
MEOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MEOH and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MEOH is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUN currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs TROX's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …HUN logoHUNHuntsman Corporat…AVNT logoAVNTAvient Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.32x2.37x1.32x1.73x1.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$66.75$10.59$84.18$15.89$44.85
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$31.57$2.86$56.11$7.30$27.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.0%+79.4%+87.5%+92.7%+81.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.458.556.965.455.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M3.1M1.5M6.2M620K
Evenly matched — MEOH and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HUN and AVNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MEOH as "Buy", TROX as "Buy", EMN as "Buy", HUN as "Hold", AVNT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.6% upside for AVNT (target: $48) vs -18.6% for HUN (target: $12). For income investors, HUN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.74% vs MEOH's 1.22%.

MetricMEOH logoMEOHMethanex Corporat…TROX logoTROXTronox Holdings p…EMN logoEMNEastman Chemical …HUN logoHUNHuntsman Corporat…AVNT logoAVNTAvient Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$69.75$7.25$77.29$12.00$48.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts1917353320
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+3.6%+4.5%+5.7%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises4012014
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.75$0.30$3.30$0.85$1.08
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.2%+0.1%+0.1%
Evenly matched — HUN and AVNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AVNT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MEOH leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallMethanex Corporation (MEOH)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MEOH vs TROX vs EMN vs HUN vs AVNT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MEOH or TROX or EMN or HUN or AVNT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Avient Corporation (AVNT) is the stronger pick with 0.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Eastman Chemical Company (EMN). Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Methanex Corporation (MEOH) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MEOH or TROX or EMN or HUN or AVNT?

On trailing P/E, Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is the cheapest at 18.

0x versus Methanex Corporation at 65. 3x. On forward P/E, Methanex Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MEOH or TROX or EMN or HUN or AVNT?

Over the past 5 years, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) delivered a total return of +62.

2%, compared to -55. 1% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEOH returned +131. 7% versus AVNT's +28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MEOH or TROX or EMN or HUN or AVNT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

32β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 631% more volatile than MEOH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avient Corporation (AVNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 81% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MEOH or TROX or EMN or HUN or AVNT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avient Corporation (AVNT) is pulling ahead at 0.

6% versus -6. 7% for Eastman Chemical Company (EMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huntsman Corporation grew EPS -44. 5% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVNT leads at -1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MEOH or TROX or EMN or HUN or AVNT?

Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

4% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEOH leads at 12. 9% versus -0. 7% for TROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVNT leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MEOH or TROX or EMN or HUN or AVNT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) trades at 6.

7x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Eastman Chemical Company — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVNT: 32. 6% to $48. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MEOH or TROX or EMN or HUN or AVNT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 1. 2% for Methanex Corporation (MEOH).

09

Is MEOH or TROX or EMN or HUN or AVNT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

32), 1. 2% yield, +131. 7% 10Y return). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEOH: +131. 7%, TROX: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MEOH and TROX and EMN and HUN and AVNT?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MEOH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EMN is a small-cap deep-value stock; HUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AVNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MEOH

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TROX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EMN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 2.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AVNT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MEOH and TROX and EMN and HUN and AVNT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MEOH: 2.1% · TROX: 3.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.