Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MESO vs FATE vs MDXG vs CRSP vs NTLA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MESO
Mesoblast Limited

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • AU
Market Cap$1.91B
5Y Perf.-42.3%
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$280M
5Y Perf.-92.5%
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$548M
5Y Perf.+2.8%
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics AG

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CH
Market Cap$5.06B
5Y Perf.-18.8%
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.-21.7%

MESO vs FATE vs MDXG vs CRSP vs NTLA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MESO logoMESO
FATE logoFATE
MDXG logoMDXG
CRSP logoCRSP
NTLA logoNTLA
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$1.91B$280M$548M$5.06B$1.62B
Revenue (TTM)$17M$7M$389M$4M$68M
Net Income (TTM)$-102M$-136M$31M$-569M$-413M
Gross Margin-208.5%81.0%-41.7%-25.6%
Operating Margin-6.4%-22.2%10.2%-134.1%-6.5%
Forward P/E295.2x
Total Debt$128M$78M$23M$395M$93M
Cash & Equiv.$161M$47M$166M$355M$155M

MESO vs FATE vs MDXG vs CRSP vs NTLALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MESO
FATE
MDXG
CRSP
NTLA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Mesoblast Limited (MESO)10057.7-42.3%
Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE)1007.5-92.5%
MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG)100102.8+2.8%
CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP)10081.2-18.8%
Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA)10078.3-21.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MESO vs FATE vs MDXG vs CRSP vs NTLA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MDXG leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Mesoblast Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. FATE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MESO
Mesoblast Limited
The Growth Play

MESO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 191.4%, EPS growth 5.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
  • 191.4% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
Best for: growth exposure
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

FATE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +143.0% vs MDXG's -47.1%
Best for: momentum
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

MDXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.22
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 4.32x
  • 7.9% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
  • Beta 1.22 vs NTLA's 2.37, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics AG
The Long-Run Compounder

CRSP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 272.0% 10Y total return vs MESO's -2.1%
  • Beta 1.93, current ratio 13.32x
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NTLA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMESO logoMESO191.4% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
Quality / MarginsMDXG logoMDXG7.9% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
Stability / SafetyMDXG logoMDXGBeta 1.22 vs NTLA's 2.37, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FATE logoFATE+143.0% vs MDXG's -47.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MDXG logoMDXG9.7% ROA vs NTLA's -45.2%, ROIC 42.3% vs -44.0%

MESO vs FATE vs MDXG vs CRSP vs NTLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MESOMesoblast Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

FATEFate Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Upfront Fee And Equity Premium
100.0%$31M
MDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Surgical
100.0%$142M
CRSPCRISPR Therapeutics AG
FY 2025
Grant
100.0%$4M
NTLAIntellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MESO vs FATE vs MDXG vs CRSP vs NTLA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMDXGLAGGINGNTLA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MDXG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MDXG is the larger business by revenue, generating $389M annually — 94.9x CRSP's $4M. MDXG is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, MESO holds the edge at +4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMESO logoMESOMesoblast LimitedFATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$17M$7M$389M$4M$68M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$106M-$148M$53M-$535M-$431M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$102M-$136M$31M-$569M-$413M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$49M-$88M$66M-$401M-$396M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-2.1%+81.0%-41.7%-25.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.4%-22.2%+10.2%-134.1%-6.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.9%-20.5%+7.9%-138.6%-6.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.8%-13.2%+17.0%-97.8%-5.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.6%-26.4%-33.1%+68.6%+78.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.0%+38.6%-2.4%+19.0%+34.6%
MDXG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MESO and FATE and MDXG each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricMESO logoMESOMesoblast LimitedFATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
Market CapShares × price$1.9B$280M$548M$5.1B$1.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.9B$312M$405M$5.1B$1.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-17.62x-2.11x11.53x-8.10x-3.60x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.295.20x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.14x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue111.04x42.18x1.31x1440.41x23.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.99x1.39x2.15x2.45x2.21x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.51x
Evenly matched — MESO and FATE and MDXG each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MDXG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

MDXG delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-66 for FATE. MDXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FATE's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MESO scores 5/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMESO logoMESOMesoblast LimitedFATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-17.1%-65.8%+12.9%-30.9%-56.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.0%-42.7%+9.7%-24.5%-45.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-8.5%-36.5%+42.3%-22.3%-44.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-9.8%-43.1%+25.7%-26.6%-48.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952514
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.21x0.38x0.09x0.21x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$33M$31M-$144M$40M-$62M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$161M$47M$166M$355M$155M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$128M$78M$23M$395M$93M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.84x25.32x
MDXG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MESO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MESO five years ago would be worth $10,602 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $318 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, FATE leads with a +143.0% total return vs MDXG's -47.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MESO at 29.5% vs NTLA's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMESO logoMESOMesoblast LimitedFATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-18.5%+145.5%-43.1%-2.5%+48.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+33.9%+143.0%-47.1%+53.1%+88.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+117.0%-55.4%-36.6%-6.3%-68.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+6.0%-96.8%-62.9%-51.3%-79.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.1%+40.5%-48.5%+272.0%-42.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+29.5%-23.6%-14.1%-2.2%-31.8%
MESO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FATE and MDXG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MDXG is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs MDXG's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMESO logoMESOMesoblast LimitedFATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.70x2.17x1.22x1.93x2.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.50$2.46$7.99$78.48$28.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.88$0.91$3.02$33.50$6.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.8%+98.6%+46.2%+66.8%+48.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.781.049.355.550.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded256K1.9M1.4M2.0M5.3M
Evenly matched — FATE and MDXG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: MESO as "Buy", FATE as "Buy", MDXG as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs -22.3% for MESO (target: $12).

MetricMESO logoMESOMesoblast LimitedFATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$11.50$39.50$10.00$63.00$20.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts1131153839
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.6%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MDXG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MESO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallMiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MESO vs FATE vs MDXG vs CRSP vs NTLA: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MESO or FATE or MDXG or CRSP or NTLA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mesoblast Limited (MESO) is the stronger pick with 191.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (295. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mesoblast Limited (MESO) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — MESO or FATE or MDXG or CRSP or NTLA?

Over the past 5 years, Mesoblast Limited (MESO) delivered a total return of +6.

0%, compared to -96. 8% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRSP returned +272. 0% versus MDXG's -48. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — MESO or FATE or MDXG or CRSP or NTLA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning NTLA is approximately 94% more volatile than MDXG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 38% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — MESO or FATE or MDXG or CRSP or NTLA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mesoblast Limited (MESO) is pulling ahead at 191.

4% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fate Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -49. 1% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — MESO or FATE or MDXG or CRSP or NTLA?

MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 6% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDXG leads at 15. 3% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDXG leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is MESO or FATE or MDXG or CRSP or NTLA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525.

5% to $39. 50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — MESO or FATE or MDXG or CRSP or NTLA?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is MESO or FATE or MDXG or CRSP or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22)). Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDXG: -48. 5%, NTLA: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between MESO and FATE and MDXG and CRSP and NTLA?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MESO is a small-cap high-growth stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MESO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 229%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FATE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDXG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRSP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTLA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 39%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MESO and FATE and MDXG and CRSP and NTLA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MESO: 458.6% · FATE: -26.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.