REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MFAN vs RC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
MFAN vs RC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $2.57B | $357M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $418M | $499M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $177M | $-229M |
| Gross Margin | 116.7% | -0.0% |
| Operating Margin | 63.3% | -50.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $10.99B | $5.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $213M | $248M |
MFAN vs RC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MFA Financial, Inc.… (MFAN) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 23.1 | -76.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MFAN vs RC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MFAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 7.1%
- 20.2% 10Y total return vs RC's 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 2.18x
RC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs MFAN's 213.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs MFAN's 213.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 42.2% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs RC's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RC's 31.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.3% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 1.2% |
MFAN vs RC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RC and MFAN operate at a comparable scale, with $499M and $418M in trailing revenue. MFAN is the more profitable business, keeping 42.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $418M | $499M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | -$249M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $177M | -$229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $76M | $303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +116.7% | -0.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +63.3% | -50.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +42.2% | -45.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +60.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +111.3% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.0% | +24.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MFAN's 19.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $357M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.97x | -1.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.45x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.34x | 48.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.93x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.68x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MFAN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MFAN delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. RC carries lower financial leverage with a 3.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MFAN's 6.01x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | -12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.01x | 3.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.8B | $5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $213M | $248M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.0B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.34x | 0.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MFAN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MFAN five years ago would be worth $12,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,564 for RC. Over the past 12 months, MFAN leads with a +10.3% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MFAN at 6.3% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.8% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.3% | -44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | -54.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | -44.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | +6.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.3% | -23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MFAN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MFAN is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFAN currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.50 | $4.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.60 | $1.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +45.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MFAN and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs MFAN's 7.12%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.1% | +31.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.79 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +18.9% |
MFAN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MFAN vs RC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MFAN or RC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 213.
0% for MFA Financial, Inc. 8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN). MFA Financial, Inc. 8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MFAN or RC?
Over the past 5 years, MFA Financial, Inc.
8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) delivered a total return of +20. 2%, compared to -44. 4% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MFAN returned +20. 2% versus RC's +6. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MFAN or RC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MFA Financial, Inc.
8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 118% more volatile than MFAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 6% for MFA Financial, Inc. 8. 875% Senior Notes — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MFAN or RC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus 213.
0% for MFA Financial, Inc. 8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MFA Financial, Inc. 8. 875% Senior Notes grew EPS 104. 9% year-over-year, compared to 45. 2% for Ready Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MFAN or RC?
MFA Financial, Inc.
8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 2% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFAN leads at 78. 8% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFAN leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MFAN or RC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 7. 1% for MFA Financial, Inc. 8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN).
07Is MFAN or RC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MFA Financial, Inc.
8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 7. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MFAN: +20. 2%, RC: +6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MFAN and RC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.