Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MGPI vs SAM vs CODI vs STZ vs TAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Alcoholic
Conglomerates
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Beverages - Alcoholic
MGPI vs SAM vs CODI vs STZ vs TAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries | Beverages - Alcoholic | Conglomerates | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries | Beverages - Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $408M | $2.18B | $905M | $26.05B | $8.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $2.09B | $1.85B | $9.38B | $11.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-240M | $-61M | $-227M | $1.11B | $-2.11B |
| Gross Margin | 36.4% | 45.2% | 38.7% | 52.0% | 37.8% |
| Operating Margin | -51.2% | -3.8% | 0.3% | 34.5% | -20.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 20.6x | 150.4x | 12.7x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $267M | $38M | $1.88B | $12.11B | $6.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $223M | $68M | $68M | $897M |
MGPI vs SAM vs CODI vs STZ vs TAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGP Ingredients, In… (MGPI) | 100 | 50.9 | -49.1% |
| The Boston Beer Com… (SAM) | 100 | 35.9 | -64.1% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
| Constellation Brand… (STZ) | 100 | 87.0 | -13.0% |
| Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MGPI vs SAM vs CODI vs STZ vs TAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, MGPI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 95.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.65x
- -15.9% vs MGPI's -38.0%
CODI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 53.7% 10Y total return vs STZ's 12.6%
- 4.8% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8%
STZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 2.7%
- Beta 0.26, yield 2.7%, current ratio 0.92x
- 11.8% margin vs MGPI's -46.0%
- Beta 0.26 vs CODI's 1.09, lower leverage
TAP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 12.7x)
- 4.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MGPI's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.8% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 12.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs MGPI's -46.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs CODI's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MGPI's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -15.9% vs MGPI's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs MGPI's -19.1%, ROIC 13.0% vs -6.7% |
MGPI vs SAM vs CODI vs STZ vs TAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MGPI vs SAM vs CODI vs STZ vs TAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TAP leads in 2 of 6 categories
STZ leads 1 • MGPI leads 1 • SAM leads 1 • CODI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TAP is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.2B annually — 21.5x MGPI's $521M. STZ is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGPI's -46.0%. On growth, TAP holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $2.1B | $1.8B | $9.4B | $11.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$249M | $14M | $109M | $3.7B | -$1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$240M | -$61M | -$227M | $1.1B | -$2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $54M | $191M | $10M | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | +45.2% | +38.7% | +52.0% | +37.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -51.2% | -3.8% | +0.3% | +34.5% | -20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -46.0% | -2.9% | -12.3% | +11.8% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +9.1% | +0.5% | +18.8% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | +1.7% | -5.9% | -9.8% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.0% | -7.4% | -5.1% | -15.0% | +35.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MGPI leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SAM's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODI's 15.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $408M | $2.2B | $905M | $26.1B | $8.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $656M | $2.0B | $2.7B | $38.1B | $13.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.83x | 20.50x | -3.94x | -333.89x | -3.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.10x | 20.56x | 150.38x | 12.70x | 9.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.45x | 14.99x | 9.37x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 1.04x | 0.48x | 2.55x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 2.54x | 1.58x | 3.82x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.37x | 10.09x | — | 13.44x | 7.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STZ delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-50 for CODI. SAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 3.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAM scores 7/9 vs TAP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.1% | -7.3% | -49.6% | +13.9% | -18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.1% | -5.0% | -7.3% | +5.1% | -8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.7% | +15.5% | +1.0% | +13.0% | -10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.1% | +14.8% | +2.4% | +18.0% | -11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.04x | 3.27x | 1.70x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $248M | -$186M | $1.8B | $12.0B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $223M | $68M | $68M | $897M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $267M | $38M | $1.9B | $12.1B | $6.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -40.23x | — | -0.97x | 5.47x | -9.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TAP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TAP five years ago would be worth $8,585 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,818 for SAM. Over the past 12 months, SAM leads with a -15.9% total return vs MGPI's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAP at -9.1% vs MGPI's -41.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.3% | +1.5% | +158.7% | +7.9% | -8.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.0% | -15.9% | -30.3% | -18.7% | -20.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.8% | -35.0% | -25.6% | -29.0% | -24.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.0% | -81.8% | -35.5% | -30.1% | -14.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.3% | +32.0% | +53.7% | +12.6% | -41.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.3% | -13.4% | -9.4% | -10.8% | -9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SAM and TAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAP is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CODI's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAM currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs MGPI's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.29x | 1.09x | 0.26x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.99 | $264.46 | $17.46 | $196.91 | $57.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.45 | $185.34 | $4.58 | $126.45 | $40.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.6% | +76.7% | +68.9% | +76.3% | +74.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 28.7 | 70.0 | 45.9 | 47.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 279K | 199K | 1.2M | 1.8M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
TAP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MGPI as "Buy", SAM as "Hold", CODI as "Hold", STZ as "Buy", TAP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.9% upside for MGPI (target: $29) vs 12.0% for TAP (target: $48). For income investors, TAP offers the higher dividend yield at 4.46% vs MGPI's 2.53%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.00 | $246.86 | $15.00 | $175.70 | $48.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 31 | 14 | 46 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | — | +4.2% | +2.7% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | — | $0.50 | $4.03 | $1.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +9.4% | +0.0% | +4.3% | +8.0% |
TAP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). STZ leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
MGPI vs SAM vs CODI vs STZ vs TAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MGPI or SAM or CODI or STZ or TAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass Diversified (CODI) is the stronger pick with 4.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MGPI or SAM or CODI or STZ or TAP?
On forward P/E, Molson Coors Beverage Company is actually cheaper at 9.
2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MGPI or SAM or CODI or STZ or TAP?
Over the past 5 years, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) delivered a total return of -14.
1%, compared to -81. 8% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODI returned +53. 7% versus TAP's -41. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MGPI or SAM or CODI or STZ or TAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
01β versus Compass Diversified's 1. 09β — meaning CODI is approximately -9084% more volatile than TAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MGPI or SAM or CODI or STZ or TAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass Diversified (CODI) is pulling ahead at 4.
8% versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, STZ leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MGPI or SAM or CODI or STZ or TAP?
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 2% net margin versus -20. 1% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus -21. 0% for TAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STZ leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MGPI or SAM or CODI or STZ or TAP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) trades at 9.
2x forward P/E versus 150. 4x for Compass Diversified — 141. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGPI: 51. 9% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MGPI or SAM or CODI or STZ or TAP?
In this comparison, TAP (4.
5% yield), CODI (4. 2% yield), STZ (2. 7% yield), MGPI (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MGPI or SAM or CODI or STZ or TAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
01), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAP: -41. 4%, CODI: +53. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MGPI and SAM and CODI and STZ and TAP?
These companies operate in different sectors (MGPI (Consumer Defensive) and SAM (Consumer Defensive) and CODI (Industrials) and STZ (Consumer Defensive) and TAP (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MGPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MGPI, CODI, STZ, TAP pay a dividend while SAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.