Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MHH vs HURN vs KFRC vs ICFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Consulting Services
MHH vs HURN vs KFRC vs ICFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $84M | $2.02B | $790M | $1.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $197M | $1.74B | $1.33B | $1.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-66K | $104M | $35M | $85M |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | 23.3% | 27.2% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 11.3% | 3.8% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.8x | 14.2x | 18.0x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $548M | $70M | $571M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $25M | $2M | $5M |
MHH vs HURN vs KFRC vs ICFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mastech Digital, In… (MHH) | 100 | 39.1 | -60.9% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 269.7 | +169.7% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| ICF International, … (ICFI) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MHH vs HURN vs KFRC vs ICFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MHH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.22x
- Beta 0.35 vs HURN's 0.82, lower leverage
HURN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 14.3% revenue growth vs ICFI's -7.3%
- 6.0% margin vs MHH's -0.0%
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs HURN's 116.8%
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ICFI's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ICFI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 18.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs ICFI's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 18.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.0% margin vs MHH's -0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs HURN's 0.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ICFI's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.9% vs HURN's -17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs MHH's -0.1%, ROIC 19.1% vs 4.4% |
MHH vs HURN vs KFRC vs ICFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MHH vs HURN vs KFRC vs ICFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MHH leads in 2 of 6 categories
HURN leads 1 • KFRC leads 1 • ICFI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HURN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 9.3x MHH's $197M. HURN is the more profitable business, keeping 6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MHH's -0.0%. On growth, HURN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $197M | $1.7B | $1.3B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $231M | $56M | $201M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$66,000 | $104M | $35M | $85M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $124M | $43M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.6% | +23.3% | +27.2% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +11.3% | +3.8% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +6.0% | +2.6% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +7.1% | +3.3% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | +14.2% | +0.1% | -10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +0.8% | +2.2% | -22.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MHH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, ICFI trades at a 42% valuation discount to MHH's 25.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MHH's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $2.0B | $790M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $60M | $2.5B | $858M | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.75x | 21.37x | 22.05x | 15.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.18x | 17.96x | 10.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.28x | 10.99x | 15.42x | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 1.19x | 0.59x | 0.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 4.25x | 6.17x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.49x | 11.06x | 16.88x | 11.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MHH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-0 for MHH. MHH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HURN's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MHH scores 7/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +21.8% | +27.2% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +6.8% | +9.2% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +15.0% | +19.1% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +18.6% | +20.1% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.04x | 0.56x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $524M | $68M | $566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $25M | $2M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $548M | $70M | $571M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.69x | 7.70x | — | 6.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HURN and KFRC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HURN five years ago would be worth $22,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,622 for MHH. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +18.9% total return vs HURN's -17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HURN at 17.6% vs ICFI's -12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | -27.1% | +39.2% | -12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.5% | -17.2% | +18.9% | -11.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.4% | +62.5% | -13.8% | -32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.8% | +120.2% | -16.8% | -16.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.0% | +116.8% | +195.5% | +100.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.7% | +17.6% | -4.8% | -12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MHH and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MHH is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HURN's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs HURN's 66.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.82x | 0.53x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.48 | $186.78 | $47.48 | $101.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $112.45 | $24.49 | $64.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.1% | +66.8% | +91.0% | +73.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 37.4 | 65.6 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 243K | 305K | 349K |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HURN as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", ICFI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 37.6% for ICFI (target: $103). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs ICFI's 0.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $200.00 | $71.00 | $102.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 10 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.6% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.55 | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +8.2% | +6.4% | +4.1% |
MHH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HURN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
MHH vs HURN vs KFRC vs ICFI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MHH or HURN or KFRC or ICFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MHH or HURN or KFRC or ICFI?
On trailing P/E, ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Mastech Digital, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, ICF International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MHH or HURN or KFRC or ICFI?
Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -53. 8% for Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +195. 5% versus ICFI's +100. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MHH or HURN or KFRC or ICFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastech Digital, Inc.
(MHH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning HURN is approximately 133% more volatile than MHH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MHH or HURN or KFRC or ICFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mastech Digital, Inc. grew EPS 145. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Kforce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MHH or HURN or KFRC or ICFI?
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus 1. 7% for Mastech Digital, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus 1. 9% for MHH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICFI leads at 34. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MHH or HURN or KFRC or ICFI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MHH or HURN or KFRC or ICFI?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
6% yield), ICFI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MHH, HURN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MHH or HURN or KFRC or ICFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, HURN: +116. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MHH and HURN and KFRC and ICFI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MHH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ICFI is a small-cap deep-value stock. KFRC, ICFI pay a dividend while MHH, HURN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.