Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MHUA vs MMSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
MHUA vs MMSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $2M | $3.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $184M | $1.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $139M |
| Gross Margin | 33.6% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | 15.5x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $898M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $449M |
MHUA vs MMSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meihua Internationa… (MHUA) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI) | 100 | 118.7 | +18.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MHUA vs MMSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MHUA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.86, Low D/E 5.0%, current ratio 5.26x
- Lower P/E (0.2x vs 15.5x)
- 10.1% margin vs MMSI's 9.0%
MMSI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.71
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 214.6% 10Y total return vs MHUA's -99.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% revenue growth vs MHUA's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 15.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs MMSI's 9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs MHUA's 2.86 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -33.8% vs MHUA's -73.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs MMSI's 5.2%, ROIC 7.4% vs 7.2% |
MHUA vs MMSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MHUA vs MMSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 8.4x MHUA's $184M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.1% (MHUA) to 9.0% (MMSI). On growth, MMSI holds the edge at +7.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $184M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $290M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $274M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +48.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.2% | +7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.8% | +38.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MHUA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.2x trailing earnings, MHUA trades at a 99% valuation discount to MMSI's 29.3x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$6M | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.19x | 29.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.40x | 13.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 2.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 2.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.14x | 17.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MHUA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MHUA delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $9 for MMSI. MHUA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MMSI's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMSI scores 6/9 vs MHUA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.7% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $450M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $449M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $898M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 31.87x | 10.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMSI five years ago would be worth $9,644 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $59 for MHUA. Over the past 12 months, MMSI leads with a -33.8% total return vs MHUA's -73.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMSI at -9.8% vs MHUA's -71.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +271.2% | -27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.6% | -33.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -3.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +214.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.3% | -9.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MMSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MMSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MHUA's 2.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MMSI currently trades 62.2% from its 52-week high vs MHUA's 11.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.86x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.00 | $100.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.05 | $59.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.9% | +62.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 34.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 769K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $95.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.6% | 0.0% |
MMSI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MHUA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
MHUA vs MMSI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MHUA or MMSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. (MHUA). Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. (MHUA) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (MMSI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MHUA or MMSI?
On trailing P/E, Meihua International Medical Technologies Co.
, Ltd. (MHUA) is the cheapest at 0. 2x versus Merit Medical Systems, Inc. at 29. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MHUA or MMSI?
Over the past 5 years, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) delivered a total return of -3. 6%, compared to -99. 4% for Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. (MHUA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +214. 6% versus MHUA's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MHUA or MMSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. 's 2. 86β — meaning MHUA is approximately 302% more volatile than MMSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. (MHUA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 57% for Merit Medical Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MHUA or MMSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -0. 2% for Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. (MHUA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Merit Medical Systems, Inc. grew EPS 4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -18. 4% for Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMSI leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MHUA or MMSI?
Meihua International Medical Technologies Co.
, Ltd. (MHUA) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 2% net margin versus 8. 5% for Merit Medical Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MHUA leads at 14. 8% versus 12. 2% for MMSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMSI leads at 48. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MHUA or MMSI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MHUA or MMSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +214. 6% 10Y return). Meihua International Medical Technologies Co. , Ltd. (MHUA) carries a higher beta of 2. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMSI: +214. 6%, MHUA: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MHUA and MMSI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MHUA is a small-cap deep-value stock; MMSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.