Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO vs ITW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Security & Protection Services
Industrial - Machinery
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO vs ITW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Security & Protection Services | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Security & Protection Services | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $7.38B | $11.76B | $12.47B | $1.62B | $73.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.73B | $4.16B | $15.23B | $561M | $16.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-278M | $634M | $371M | $31M | $3.13B |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 45.0% | 30.0% | 45.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 20.6% | 7.8% | 2.7% | 26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 15.6x | 17.6x | 18.5x | 22.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.17B | $2.28B | $5.86B | $7M | $8.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $222M | $356M | $280M | $146M | $851M |
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO vs ITW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Middleby Corpor… (MIDD) | 100 | 232.3 | +132.3% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Arlo Technologies, … (ARLO) | 100 | 674.2 | +574.2% |
| Illinois Tool Works… (ITW) | 100 | 148.2 | +48.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO vs ITW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, MIDD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ALLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 1.84x
- PEG 0.92 vs ITW's 2.36
- Beta 0.67, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.84x
SWK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 4.1%
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ARLO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +43.3% vs ALLE's -1.0%
ITW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 189.4% 10Y total return vs ALLE's 127.3%
- 19.3% margin vs MIDD's -7.4%
- 19.4% ROA vs MIDD's -4.1%, ROIC 29.0% vs 8.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.8% revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 22.7x), PEG 0.92 vs 2.36 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs MIDD's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.3% vs ALLE's -1.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs MIDD's -4.1%, ROIC 29.0% vs 8.7% |
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO vs ITW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO vs ITW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWK leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARLO leads 2 • ITW leads 1 • MIDD leads 0 • ALLE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 28.9x ARLO's $561M. ITW is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MIDD's -7.4%. On growth, ARLO holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $4.2B | $15.2B | $561M | $16.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $959M | $1.7B | $18M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$278M | $634M | $371M | $31M | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $559M | $704M | $726M | $64M | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +45.0% | +30.0% | +45.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +20.6% | +7.8% | +2.7% | +26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +15.2% | +2.4% | +5.5% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +16.9% | +4.8% | +11.5% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.5% | +9.7% | +2.7% | +26.3% | +4.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.3% | -7.0% | -35.0% | — | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SWK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.4x trailing earnings, ALLE trades at a 83% valuation discount to ARLO's 106.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.08x vs ITW's 2.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $11.8B | $12.5B | $1.6B | $73.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.3B | $13.7B | $18.0B | $1.5B | $81.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.41x | 18.39x | 30.26x | 106.43x | 24.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.03x | 15.60x | 17.64x | 18.51x | 22.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.08x | — | — | 2.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.56x | 13.83x | 11.71x | 148.35x | 17.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 2.89x | 0.82x | 3.07x | 4.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.94x | 5.72x | 1.35x | 12.84x | 23.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.21x | 17.14x | 18.12x | 24.27x | 27.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARLO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MIDD. ARLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARLO scores 7/9 vs ITW's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.5% | +32.1% | +4.1% | +22.9% | +97.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.1% | +12.3% | +1.7% | +9.1% | +19.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +18.1% | +5.8% | +35.9% | +29.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +20.8% | +7.0% | +4.7% | +38.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 1.10x | 0.65x | 0.05x | 2.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $1.9B | $5.6B | -$140M | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $222M | $356M | $280M | $146M | $851M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $2.3B | $5.9B | $7M | $9.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.20x | 8.61x | 2.07x | — | 14.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARLO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARLO five years ago would be worth $22,305 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,381 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, ARLO leads with a +43.3% total return vs ALLE's -1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARLO at 29.3% vs SWK's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | -14.6% | +5.9% | +12.6% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.2% | -1.0% | +41.7% | +43.3% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.6% | +32.6% | +6.9% | +116.3% | +19.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.5% | +3.2% | -56.2% | +123.1% | +18.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.1% | +127.3% | -1.5% | -32.6% | +189.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.8% | +9.9% | +2.2% | +29.3% | +6.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MIDD and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MIDD currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs ALLE's 74.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.67x | 1.83x | 1.48x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $169.44 | $183.11 | $93.37 | $19.94 | $303.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.82 | $131.25 | $58.23 | $10.20 | $236.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +74.7% | +85.9% | +74.7% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 38.5 | 61.0 | 54.0 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 571K | 887K | 2.0M | 1.3M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MIDD as "Buy", ALLE as "Hold", SWK as "Hold", ARLO as "Buy", ITW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.1% upside for ALLE (target: $173) vs 7.1% for ITW (target: $274). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs ALLE's 1.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $176.67 | $172.50 | $89.17 | $17.50 | $273.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 23 | 37 | 10 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +4.1% | — | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 12 | 16 | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.03 | $3.29 | — | $6.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.8% | +0.7% | +0.1% | +2.8% | +2.0% |
SWK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ARLO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MIDD vs ALLE vs SWK vs ARLO vs ITW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO or ITW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger pick with 7.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). Allegion plc (ALLE) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO or ITW?
On trailing P/E, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the cheapest at 18.
4x versus Arlo Technologies, Inc. at 106. 4x. On forward P/E, Allegion plc is actually cheaper at 15. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 92x versus Illinois Tool Works Inc. 's 2. 36x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO or ITW?
Over the past 5 years, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) delivered a total return of +123. 1%, compared to -56. 2% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITW returned +189. 4% versus ARLO's -32. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO or ITW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 175% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO or ITW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allegion plc (ALLE) is pulling ahead at 7.
8% versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arlo Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 145. 2% year-over-year, compared to -168. 1% for The Middleby Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALLE leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO or ITW?
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 1% net margin versus -8. 7% for The Middleby Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITW leads at 26. 3% versus 1. 1% for ARLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO or ITW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus Illinois Tool Works Inc. 's 2. 36x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Allegion plc (ALLE) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 7x for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLE: 26. 1% to $172. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO or ITW?
In this comparison, SWK (4.
1% yield), ITW (2. 4% yield), ALLE (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MIDD, ARLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MIDD or ALLE or SWK or ARLO or ITW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 2. 4% yield, +189. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITW: +189. 4%, ARLO: -32. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MIDD and ALLE and SWK and ARLO and ITW?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MIDD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ARLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ALLE, SWK, ITW pay a dividend while MIDD, ARLO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.