Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MIDD vs ITW vs SWK vs GNRC vs EMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
MIDD vs ITW vs SWK vs GNRC vs EMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $7.38B | $73.64B | $12.47B | $15.65B | $79.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.73B | $16.22B | $15.23B | $4.33B | $18.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-278M | $3.13B | $371M | $189M | $2.44B |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 44.1% | 30.0% | 38.1% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 26.4% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 22.7x | 17.6x | 30.9x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.17B | $8.97B | $5.86B | $1.33B | $13.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $222M | $851M | $280M | $341M | $1.54B |
MIDD vs ITW vs SWK vs GNRC vs EMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Middleby Corpor… (MIDD) | 100 | 232.3 | +132.3% |
| Illinois Tool Works… (ITW) | 100 | 148.2 | +48.2% |
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 239.8 | +139.8% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.2 | +131.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MIDD vs ITW vs SWK vs GNRC vs EMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MIDD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 78.3%, current ratio 2.57x
- Lower P/E (17.0x vs 21.7x)
ITW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.4%
- PEG 2.36 vs EMR's 4.81
- Beta 0.67, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.21x
- 19.3% margin vs MIDD's -7.4%
SWK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
GNRC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +129.9% vs ITW's +9.0%
EMR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- 206.6% 10Y total return vs GNRC's 6.7%
- 3.0% revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.0x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs MIDD's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.9% vs ITW's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs MIDD's -4.1%, ROIC 29.0% vs 8.7% |
MIDD vs ITW vs SWK vs GNRC vs EMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MIDD vs ITW vs SWK vs GNRC vs EMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITW leads in 1 of 6 categories
GNRC leads 1 • MIDD leads 0 • SWK leads 0 • EMR leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ITW and GNRC and EMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.3B annually — 4.9x MIDD's $3.7B. ITW is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MIDD's -7.4%. On growth, GNRC holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $16.2B | $15.2B | $4.3B | $18.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $4.6B | $1.7B | $472M | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$278M | $3.1B | $371M | $189M | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $559M | $2.2B | $726M | $419M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +44.1% | +30.0% | +38.1% | +52.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +26.4% | +7.8% | +7.5% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +19.3% | +2.4% | +4.4% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +13.6% | +4.8% | +9.7% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.5% | +4.6% | +2.7% | +12.4% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.3% | +11.8% | -35.0% | +69.9% | +28.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MIDD and SWK each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.4x trailing earnings, ITW trades at a 75% valuation discount to GNRC's 99.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ITW offers better value at 2.53x vs EMR's 7.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $73.6B | $12.5B | $15.7B | $79.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.3B | $81.8B | $18.0B | $16.6B | $91.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.41x | 24.36x | 30.26x | 99.17x | 34.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.03x | 22.68x | 17.64x | 30.91x | 21.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.53x | — | — | 7.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.56x | 17.74x | 11.71x | 34.39x | 18.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 4.59x | 0.82x | 3.72x | 4.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.94x | 23.15x | 1.35x | 5.99x | 3.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.21x | 27.20x | 18.12x | 58.38x | 29.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MIDD. GNRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMR scores 7/9 vs ITW's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.5% | +97.4% | +4.1% | +7.2% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.1% | +19.4% | +1.7% | +3.4% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +29.0% | +5.8% | +5.9% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +38.7% | +7.0% | +6.9% | +10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 2.78x | 0.65x | 0.51x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $8.1B | $5.6B | $992M | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $222M | $851M | $280M | $341M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $9.0B | $5.9B | $1.3B | $13.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.20x | 14.53x | 2.07x | 4.54x | 6.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GNRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EMR five years ago would be worth $15,945 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,381 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, GNRC leads with a +129.9% total return vs ITW's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GNRC at 34.2% vs SWK's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | +3.1% | +5.9% | +89.1% | +4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.2% | +9.0% | +41.7% | +129.9% | +30.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.6% | +19.5% | +6.9% | +141.5% | +75.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.5% | +18.9% | -56.2% | -18.5% | +59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.1% | +189.4% | -1.5% | +666.1% | +206.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.8% | +6.1% | +2.2% | +34.2% | +20.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ITW and GNRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITW is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs ITW's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.67x | 1.83x | 1.69x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $169.44 | $303.16 | $93.37 | $269.58 | $165.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.82 | $236.68 | $58.23 | $113.96 | $108.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +84.3% | +85.9% | +99.0% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 45.3 | 61.0 | 77.8 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 571K | 1.2M | 2.0M | 895K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SWK and EMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MIDD as "Buy", ITW as "Hold", SWK as "Hold", GNRC as "Buy", EMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.8% upside for EMR (target: $162) vs 1.7% for GNRC (target: $271). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs EMR's 1.49%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $176.67 | $273.67 | $89.17 | $271.22 | $161.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 28 | 37 | 39 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% | +4.1% | +0.0% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 12 | 16 | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.11 | $3.29 | $0.00 | $2.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.8% | +2.0% | +0.1% | +0.9% | +1.6% |
ITW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). GNRC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
MIDD vs ITW vs SWK vs GNRC vs EMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MIDD or ITW or SWK or GNRC or EMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) offers the better valuation at 24. 4x trailing P/E (22. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MIDD or ITW or SWK or GNRC or EMR?
On trailing P/E, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the cheapest at 24. 4x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 2x. On forward P/E, The Middleby Corporation is actually cheaper at 17. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Illinois Tool Works Inc. wins at 2. 36x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MIDD or ITW or SWK or GNRC or EMR?
Over the past 5 years, Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) delivered a total return of +59. 5%, compared to -56. 2% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +666. 1% versus SWK's -1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MIDD or ITW or SWK or GNRC or EMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 173% more volatile than ITW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MIDD or ITW or SWK or GNRC or EMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. grew EPS 35. 9% year-over-year, compared to -168. 1% for The Middleby Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, EMR leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MIDD or ITW or SWK or GNRC or EMR?
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 1% net margin versus -8. 7% for The Middleby Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITW leads at 26. 3% versus 6. 9% for GNRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MIDD or ITW or SWK or GNRC or EMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 36x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) trades at 17. 0x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 13. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMR: 14. 8% to $161. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — MIDD or ITW or SWK or GNRC or EMR?
In this comparison, SWK (4.
1% yield), ITW (2. 4% yield), EMR (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MIDD, GNRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MIDD or ITW or SWK or GNRC or EMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 2. 4% yield, +189. 4% 10Y return). Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITW: +189. 4%, SWK: -1. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MIDD and ITW and SWK and GNRC and EMR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MIDD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EMR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ITW, SWK, EMR pay a dividend while MIDD, GNRC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.