Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MIDD vs MWA vs TRMK vs ITW vs SWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Banks - Regional
Industrial - Machinery
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
MIDD vs MWA vs TRMK vs ITW vs SWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Banks - Regional | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $7.68B | $4.12B | $2.63B | $73.42B | $12.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.73B | $1.46B | $1.12B | $16.22B | $15.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-278M | $207M | $224M | $3.13B | $371M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 37.6% | 71.0% | 44.1% | 30.0% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 19.4% | 25.5% | 26.4% | 7.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.7x | 17.9x | 11.5x | 22.6x | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.17B | $452M | $1.12B | $8.97B | $5.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $222M | $432M | $668M | $851M | $280M |
MIDD vs MWA vs TRMK vs ITW vs SWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Middleby Corpor… (MIDD) | 100 | 241.8 | +141.8% |
| Mueller Water Produ… (MWA) | 100 | 282.3 | +182.3% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.0 | +88.0% |
| Illinois Tool Works… (ITW) | 100 | 147.7 | +47.7% |
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MIDD vs MWA vs TRMK vs ITW vs SWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MIDD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MWA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 64.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 174.4% 10Y total return vs ITW's 188.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 46.0%, current ratio 3.54x
- PEG 0.81 vs ITW's 2.35
TRMK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4%
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 17.8x)
- 20.0% margin vs MIDD's -7.4%
ITW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.68, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.68 vs SWK's 1.83
- 19.4% ROA vs MIDD's -4.1%, ROIC 29.0% vs 8.7%
SWK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends and momentum.
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs ITW's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +36.4% vs ITW's +7.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 17.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs MIDD's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs ITW's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.4% vs ITW's +7.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs MIDD's -4.1%, ROIC 29.0% vs 8.7% |
MIDD vs MWA vs TRMK vs ITW vs SWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MIDD vs MWA vs TRMK vs ITW vs SWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMK leads in 3 of 6 categories
MWA leads 1 • SWK leads 1 • MIDD leads 0 • ITW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 14.5x TRMK's $1.1B. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MIDD's -7.4%. On growth, MWA holds the edge at +5.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $1.5B | $1.1B | $16.2B | $15.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $333M | $323M | $4.6B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$278M | $207M | $224M | $3.1B | $371M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $559M | $171M | $230M | $2.2B | $726M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +37.6% | +71.0% | +44.1% | +30.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +19.4% | +25.5% | +26.4% | +7.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +14.2% | +20.0% | +19.3% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +11.7% | +20.7% | +13.6% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.5% | +5.5% | — | +4.6% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.3% | +15.2% | +5.4% | +11.8% | -35.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 60% valuation discount to SWK's 30.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MWA offers better value at 0.98x vs ITW's 2.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.7B | $4.1B | $2.6B | $73.4B | $12.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.6B | $4.1B | $3.1B | $81.5B | $18.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.61x | 21.61x | 12.09x | 24.29x | 30.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.67x | 17.89x | 11.45x | 22.56x | 17.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.98x | 1.50x | 2.53x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.00x | 13.80x | 9.46x | 17.70x | 11.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.40x | 2.88x | 2.35x | 4.58x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.06x | 4.23x | 1.28x | 23.08x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.75x | 23.98x | 11.35x | 27.12x | 18.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MWA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MIDD. MWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MWA scores 7/9 vs ITW's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.5% | +20.7% | +10.8% | +97.4% | +4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.1% | +11.4% | +1.2% | +19.4% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +19.7% | +7.1% | +29.0% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +17.8% | +3.2% | +38.7% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.46x | 0.53x | 2.78x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $20M | $448M | $8.1B | $5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $222M | $432M | $668M | $851M | $280M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $452M | $1.1B | $9.0B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.20x | 22.98x | 0.75x | 14.53x | 2.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MWA five years ago would be worth $18,663 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,402 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, SWK leads with a +36.4% total return vs ITW's +7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.6% vs SWK's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.2% | +10.4% | +15.1% | +2.8% | +7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.0% | +7.7% | +29.7% | +7.4% | +36.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.0% | +85.1% | +117.7% | +19.2% | +7.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | +86.6% | +47.7% | +18.2% | -56.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.0% | +174.4% | +127.0% | +188.6% | -0.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.1% | +22.8% | +29.6% | +6.0% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and ITW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITW is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs ITW's 84.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 0.94x | 0.92x | 0.68x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $169.44 | $31.00 | $45.99 | $303.16 | $93.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.82 | $22.74 | $33.39 | $238.82 | $59.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +85.1% | +97.3% | +84.0% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.6 | 39.2 | 55.8 | 40.9 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 568K | 1.0M | 386K | 1.2M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MIDD as "Buy", MWA as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", ITW as "Hold", SWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.3% upside for MWA (target: $32) vs 1.7% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.06% vs MWA's 1.01%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $192.50 | $32.25 | $45.50 | $271.17 | $89.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 21 | 9 | 28 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | +2.2% | +2.4% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 12 | 1 | 12 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.27 | $0.97 | $6.11 | $3.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.4% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +2.0% | +0.1% |
TRMK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MWA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
MIDD vs MWA vs TRMK vs ITW vs SWK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MIDD or MWA or TRMK or ITW or SWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MIDD or MWA or TRMK or ITW or SWK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. at 30. 6x. On forward P/E, Trustmark Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mueller Water Products, Inc. wins at 0. 81x versus Illinois Tool Works Inc. 's 2. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MIDD or MWA or TRMK or ITW or SWK?
Over the past 5 years, Mueller Water Products, Inc.
(MWA) delivered a total return of +86. 6%, compared to -56. 0% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITW returned +188. 6% versus SWK's -0. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MIDD or MWA or TRMK or ITW or SWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 168% more volatile than ITW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MIDD or MWA or TRMK or ITW or SWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mueller Water Products, Inc. grew EPS 64. 9% year-over-year, compared to -168. 1% for The Middleby Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MWA leads at 4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MIDD or MWA or TRMK or ITW or SWK?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus -8. 7% for The Middleby Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITW leads at 26. 3% versus 7. 6% for SWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MIDD or MWA or TRMK or ITW or SWK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Illinois Tool Works Inc. 's 2. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MWA: 22. 3% to $32. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MIDD or MWA or TRMK or ITW or SWK?
In this comparison, SWK (4.
1% yield), ITW (2. 4% yield), TRMK (2. 2% yield), MWA (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. MIDD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MIDD or MWA or TRMK or ITW or SWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 2. 4% yield, +188. 6% 10Y return). Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITW: +188. 6%, SWK: -0. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MIDD and MWA and TRMK and ITW and SWK?
These companies operate in different sectors (MIDD (Industrials) and MWA (Industrials) and TRMK (Financial Services) and ITW (Industrials) and SWK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MIDD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MWA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; ITW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MWA, TRMK, ITW, SWK pay a dividend while MIDD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.