MIND
MIND Technology, Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$60M
5Y Perf.-57.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MIND vs TGS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TGS
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$2.19B
5Y Perf.+487.7%
MIND vs TGS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MIND | TGS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $60M | $2.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $1.65T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $406.73B |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | 41.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $1.67T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $803.80B |
MIND vs TGS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MIND
TGS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIND Technology, In… (MIND) | 100 | 43.0 | -57.0% |
| Transportadora de G… (TGS) | 100 | 587.7 | +487.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MIND vs TGS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TGS leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MIND
MIND Technology, Inc.
The Growth Play
MIND is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 268.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.6%
Best for: growth exposure
TGS
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
The Income Pick
TGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 4.1%
- 467.2% 10Y total return vs MIND's -80.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 53.5%, current ratio 5.00x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TGS | 64.8% revenue growth vs MIND's 28.4% |
| Value | TGS | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 10.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | TGS | 24.6% margin vs MIND's 6.6% |
| Stability / Safety | TGS | Beta 0.90 vs MIND's 2.13 |
| Dividends | TGS | 4.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TGS | +24.9% vs MIND's +0.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TGS | 9.6% ROA vs MIND's 6.4%, ROIC 19.3% vs 24.4% |
MIND vs TGS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
Segment breakdown not available.
MIND vs TGS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTGSLAGGINGMIND
MINDMIND Technology, Inc.
2leads
TGSTransportadora de Gas…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MINDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TGS6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MIND3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MIND5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TGS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TGS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TGS1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.65T annually — 35773.2x MIND's $46M. TGS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MIND's 6.6%. On growth, TGS holds the edge at +37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MINDMIND Technology, … | TGSTransportadora de… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $1.65T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $885.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $406.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $224.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.5% | +53.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +41.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.0% | +37.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.7% | -3.8% |
TGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MIND leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, MIND trades at a 24% valuation discount to TGS's 13.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TGS's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MIND's 7.2x.
| Metric | MINDMIND Technology, … | TGSTransportadora de… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $60M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56M | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.34x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.19x | 3.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.28x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.93x | 2.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 279.59x | 11.35x |
MIND leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MIND leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $8 for MIND. MIND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TGS's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGS scores 8/9 vs MIND's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MINDMIND Technology, … | TGSTransportadora de… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.6% | +14.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +24.4% | +19.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.6% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $868.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $803.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $1.67T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 8.01x |
MIND leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGS five years ago would be worth $75,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,929 for MIND. Over the past 12 months, TGS leads with a +24.9% total return vs MIND's +0.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGS at 39.8% vs MIND's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MINDMIND Technology, … | TGSTransportadora de… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.4% | +2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.3% | +24.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.0% | +173.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.7% | +652.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.3% | +467.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.5% | +39.8% |
TGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MIND's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGS currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs MIND's 45.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MINDMIND Technology, … | TGSTransportadora de… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.50 | $36.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $19.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.7% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 38.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 177K | 341K |
TGS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TGS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
TGS is the only dividend payer here at 4.07% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MINDMIND Technology, … | TGSTransportadora de… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1788.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TGS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TGS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MIND leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallTransportadora de Gas del S… (TGS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MIND vs TGS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MIND or TGS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger pick with 64. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 28. 4% for MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND). MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MIND or TGS?
On trailing P/E, MIND Technology, Inc.
(MIND) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. at 13. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MIND or TGS?
Over the past 5 years, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) delivered a total return of +652. 1%, compared to -70. 7% for MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGS returned +467. 2% versus MIND's -80. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MIND or TGS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus MIND Technology, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning MIND is approximately 136% more volatile than TGS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 53% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MIND or TGS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is pulling ahead at 64. 8% versus 28. 4% for MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MIND Technology, Inc. grew EPS 268. 4% year-over-year, compared to 32. 2% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MIND leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MIND or TGS?
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus 10. 8% for MIND Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGS leads at 43. 3% versus 14. 5% for MIND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGS leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MIND or TGS?
In this comparison, TGS (4.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MIND does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MIND or TGS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 4. 1% yield, +467. 2% 10Y return). MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGS: +467. 2%, MIND: -80. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MIND and TGS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MIND (Technology) and TGS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TGS pays a dividend while MIND does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MIND: -20.0% · TGS: 37.8%)Net Margin>
%
(MIND: 6.6% · TGS: 24.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MIND: 10.3x · TGS: 13.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.