Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs CMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Steel
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs CMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Steel |
| Market Cap | $15.29B | $4.21B | $527M | $26.96B | $7.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.37B | $1.46B | $678M | $4.33B | $8.01B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $847M | $207M | $48M | $492M | $438M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 37.6% | 15.0% | 37.0% | 16.5% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 19.4% | 9.2% | 15.8% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 18.6x | 16.6x | 39.7x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $46M | $452M | $4M | $1.56B | $1.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.37B | $432M | $39M | $238M | $1.04B |
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs CMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mueller Industries,… (MLI) | 100 | 1029.1 | +929.1% |
| Mueller Water Produ… (MWA) | 100 | 287.9 | +187.9% |
| Insteel Industries,… (IIIN) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
| nVent Electric plc (NVT) | 100 | 909.6 | +809.6% |
| Commercial Metals C… (CMC) | 100 | 410.8 | +310.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs CMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs NVT's 5.8%
- PEG 0.42 vs IIIN's 1.01
- Lower P/E (17.0x vs 39.7x)
- 19.4% margin vs CMC's 5.5%
MWA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 1.0%
IIIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 3.97x
- Beta 1.01, yield 4.1%, current ratio 3.97x
- Beta 1.01 vs NVT's 1.68, lower leverage
- 4.1% yield, vs MWA's 1.0%
NVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
- 29.5% revenue growth vs CMC's -1.6%
- +178.6% vs IIIN's -18.7%
Among these 5 stocks, CMC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.5% revenue growth vs CMC's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.0x vs 39.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs CMC's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs NVT's 1.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, vs MWA's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +178.6% vs IIIN's -18.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.9% ROA vs CMC's 4.7%, ROIC 44.7% vs 8.5% |
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs CMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs CMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MLI leads in 2 of 6 categories
IIIN leads 1 • NVT leads 1 • MWA leads 0 • CMC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.0B annually — 11.8x IIIN's $678M. MLI is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMC's 5.5%. On growth, NVT holds the edge at +53.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $1.5B | $678M | $4.3B | $8.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $333M | $81M | $848M | $890M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $847M | $207M | $48M | $492M | $438M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $652M | $171M | $439,000 | $387M | $296M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +37.6% | +15.0% | +37.0% | +16.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +19.4% | +9.2% | +15.8% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +14.2% | +7.0% | +11.4% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +11.7% | +0.1% | +8.9% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +5.5% | +23.3% | +53.5% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.4% | +15.2% | +6.1% | -59.7% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IIIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, IIIN trades at a 86% valuation discount to CMC's 95.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MLI offers better value at 0.49x vs MWA's 1.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.3B | $4.2B | $527M | $27.0B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.0B | $4.2B | $492M | $28.3B | $8.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.09x | 22.04x | 12.92x | 38.68x | 95.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.02x | 18.65x | 16.60x | 39.70x | 10.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.49x | 1.00x | 0.78x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.49x | 14.07x | 6.76x | 34.30x | 10.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.66x | 2.94x | 0.81x | 6.93x | 1.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.06x | 4.31x | 1.43x | 7.36x | 1.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.27x | 24.45x | 27.81x | 72.49x | 25.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI delivers a 28.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $10 for CMC. IIIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MWA's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MWA scores 7/9 vs CMC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.4% | +20.7% | +13.2% | +13.4% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.9% | +11.4% | +10.4% | +7.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +44.7% | +19.7% | +14.1% | +8.9% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +32.6% | +17.8% | +14.1% | +10.5% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.46x | 0.01x | 0.42x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $20M | -$35M | $1.3B | $311M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $432M | $39M | $238M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46M | $452M | $4M | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13483.55x | 22.98x | 1192.54x | 6.61x | 9.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLI five years ago would be worth $59,094 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,796 for IIIN. Over the past 12 months, NVT leads with a +178.6% total return vs IIIN's -18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVT at 59.8% vs IIIN's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.3% | +12.6% | -16.2% | +56.5% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.2% | +14.9% | -18.7% | +178.6% | +58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +274.8% | +88.7% | +10.4% | +308.2% | +63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +490.9% | +89.1% | -12.0% | +436.7% | +127.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +847.6% | +179.4% | +48.0% | +576.7% | +356.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.3% | +23.6% | +3.3% | +59.8% | +17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MLI and IIIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IIIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVT's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MLI currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs IIIN's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.02x | 1.01x | 1.68x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $140.84 | $31.00 | $41.64 | $174.50 | $84.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $72.16 | $22.74 | $24.35 | $59.73 | $44.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +86.7% | +65.2% | +95.5% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 41.2 | 39.5 | 82.3 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 679K | 1.0M | 211K | 2.3M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MWA and IIIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MLI as "Hold", MWA as "Hold", IIIN as "Buy", NVT as "Buy", CMC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.9% upside for MWA (target: $33) vs -19.6% for NVT (target: $134). For income investors, IIIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs NVT's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.33 | — | $134.00 | $82.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 21 | 4 | 17 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.0% | +4.1% | +0.5% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $0.27 | $1.11 | $0.79 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.4% | +0.4% | +0.9% | +2.7% |
MLI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IIIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs CMC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or CMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the stronger pick with 29.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or CMC?
On trailing P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus Commercial Metals Company at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, Commercial Metals Company is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mueller Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Insteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or CMC?
Over the past 5 years, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) delivered a total return of +490. 9%, compared to -12. 0% for Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MLI returned +847. 6% versus IIIN's +48. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or CMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus nVent Electric plc's 1. 68β — meaning NVT is approximately 66% more volatile than IIIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 46% for Mueller Water Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or CMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), nVent Electric plc (NVT) is pulling ahead at 29.
5% versus -1. 6% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: nVent Electric plc grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to -82. 1% for Commercial Metals Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVT leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or CMC?
Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus 1. 1% for Commercial Metals Company — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLI leads at 21. 4% versus 6. 7% for CMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVT leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or CMC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Insteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for nVent Electric plc — 28. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MWA: 23. 9% to $33. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or CMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 0. 5% for nVent Electric plc (NVT).
09Is MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or CMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 7% yield, +847. 6% 10Y return). nVent Electric plc (NVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MLI: +847. 6%, NVT: +576. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLI and MWA and IIIN and NVT and CMC?
These companies operate in different sectors (MLI (Industrials) and MWA (Industrials) and IIIN (Industrials) and NVT (Industrials) and CMC (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MLI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MWA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MLI, MWA, IIIN, CMC pay a dividend while NVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.