Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs WCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Distribution
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs WCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $15.29B | $4.21B | $527M | $26.96B | $17.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.37B | $1.46B | $678M | $4.33B | $24.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $847M | $207M | $48M | $492M | $676M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 37.6% | 15.0% | 37.0% | 20.3% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 19.4% | 9.2% | 15.8% | 5.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 18.6x | 16.6x | 39.7x | 22.4x |
| Total Debt | $46M | $452M | $4M | $1.56B | $7.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.37B | $432M | $39M | $238M | $605M |
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs WCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mueller Industries,… (MLI) | 100 | 1029.1 | +929.1% |
| Mueller Water Produ… (MWA) | 100 | 287.9 | +187.9% |
| Insteel Industries,… (IIIN) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
| nVent Electric plc (NVT) | 100 | 909.6 | +809.6% |
| WESCO International… (WCC) | 100 | 1053.7 | +953.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs WCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs NVT's 5.8%
- 19.4% margin vs WCC's 2.8%
- 23.9% ROA vs WCC's 4.1%, ROIC 44.7% vs 8.5%
MWA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 1.0%
IIIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 3.97x
- Beta 1.01, yield 4.1%, current ratio 3.97x
- Lower P/E (16.6x vs 39.7x)
- Beta 1.01 vs WCC's 1.83, lower leverage
NVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
- 29.5% revenue growth vs WCC's 7.8%
- +178.6% vs IIIN's -18.7%
WCC is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.42 vs IIIN's 1.01
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.5% revenue growth vs WCC's 7.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 39.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs WCC's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs WCC's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, vs MWA's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +178.6% vs IIIN's -18.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.9% ROA vs WCC's 4.1%, ROIC 44.7% vs 8.5% |
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs WCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs WCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MLI leads in 2 of 6 categories
IIIN leads 1 • NVT leads 1 • MWA leads 0 • WCC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.2B annually — 35.8x IIIN's $678M. MLI is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WCC's 2.8%. On growth, NVT holds the edge at +53.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $1.5B | $678M | $4.3B | $24.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $333M | $81M | $848M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $847M | $207M | $48M | $492M | $676M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $652M | $171M | $439,000 | $387M | $216M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +37.6% | +15.0% | +37.0% | +20.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +19.4% | +9.2% | +15.8% | +5.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +14.2% | +7.0% | +11.4% | +2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +11.7% | +0.1% | +8.9% | +0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +5.5% | +23.3% | +53.5% | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.4% | +15.2% | +6.1% | -59.7% | +48.1% |
Valuation Metrics
IIIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, IIIN trades at a 67% valuation discount to NVT's 38.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MLI offers better value at 0.49x vs MWA's 1.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.3B | $4.2B | $527M | $27.0B | $17.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.0B | $4.2B | $492M | $28.3B | $24.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.09x | 22.04x | 12.92x | 38.68x | 26.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.02x | 18.65x | 16.60x | 39.70x | 22.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.49x | 1.00x | 0.78x | — | 0.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.49x | 14.07x | 6.76x | 34.30x | 16.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.66x | 2.94x | 0.81x | 6.93x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.06x | 4.31x | 1.43x | 7.36x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.27x | 24.45x | 27.81x | 72.49x | 678.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI delivers a 28.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $13 for IIIN. IIIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WCC's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MWA scores 7/9 vs WCC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.4% | +20.7% | +13.2% | +13.4% | +13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.9% | +11.4% | +10.4% | +7.2% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +44.7% | +19.7% | +14.1% | +8.9% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +32.6% | +17.8% | +14.1% | +10.5% | +10.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.46x | 0.01x | 0.42x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $20M | -$35M | $1.3B | $6.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $432M | $39M | $238M | $605M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46M | $452M | $4M | $1.6B | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13483.55x | 22.98x | 1192.54x | 6.61x | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLI five years ago would be worth $59,094 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,796 for IIIN. Over the past 12 months, NVT leads with a +178.6% total return vs IIIN's -18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVT at 59.8% vs IIIN's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.3% | +12.6% | -16.2% | +56.5% | +39.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.2% | +14.9% | -18.7% | +178.6% | +122.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +274.8% | +88.7% | +10.4% | +308.2% | +174.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +490.9% | +89.1% | -12.0% | +436.7% | +225.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +847.6% | +179.4% | +48.0% | +576.7% | +537.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.3% | +23.6% | +3.3% | +59.8% | +39.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MLI and IIIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IIIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WCC's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MLI currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs IIIN's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.02x | 1.01x | 1.68x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $140.84 | $31.00 | $41.64 | $174.50 | $368.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $72.16 | $22.74 | $24.35 | $59.73 | $157.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +86.7% | +65.2% | +95.5% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 41.2 | 39.5 | 82.3 | 72.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 679K | 1.0M | 211K | 2.3M | 575K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MWA and IIIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MLI as "Hold", MWA as "Hold", IIIN as "Buy", NVT as "Buy", WCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.9% upside for MWA (target: $33) vs -19.6% for NVT (target: $134). For income investors, IIIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs NVT's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.33 | — | $134.00 | $360.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 21 | 4 | 17 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.0% | +4.1% | +0.5% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $0.27 | $1.11 | $0.79 | $1.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.4% | +0.4% | +0.9% | +3.6% |
MLI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IIIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MLI vs MWA vs IIIN vs NVT vs WCC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or WCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the stronger pick with 29.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 8% for WESCO International, Inc. (WCC). Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or WCC?
On trailing P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus nVent Electric plc at 38. 7x. On forward P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WESCO International, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Insteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or WCC?
Over the past 5 years, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) delivered a total return of +490. 9%, compared to -12. 0% for Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MLI returned +847. 6% versus IIIN's +48. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or WCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus WESCO International, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning WCC is approximately 81% more volatile than IIIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 149% for WESCO International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or WCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), nVent Electric plc (NVT) is pulling ahead at 29.
5% versus 7. 8% for WESCO International, Inc. (WCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: nVent Electric plc grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for WESCO International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVT leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or WCC?
Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus 2. 7% for WESCO International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLI leads at 21. 4% versus 5. 2% for WCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVT leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or WCC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Insteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for nVent Electric plc — 23. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MWA: 23. 9% to $33. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or WCC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 0. 5% for nVent Electric plc (NVT).
09Is MLI or MWA or IIIN or NVT or WCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 7% yield, +847. 6% 10Y return). nVent Electric plc (NVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MLI: +847. 6%, NVT: +576. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLI and MWA and IIIN and NVT and WCC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MLI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MWA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WCC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MLI, MWA, IIIN, WCC pay a dividend while NVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.