Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MLSS vs SYK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
MLSS vs SYK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $36M | $109.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $25.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $3.25B |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 63.5% |
| Operating Margin | -77.0% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $349K | $14.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $4.01B |
MLSS vs SYK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone Scientifi… (MLSS) | 100 | 24.8 | -75.2% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 145.8 | +45.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLSS vs SYK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLSS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.48x
SYK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 11.2%, EPS growth 8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.8%
- 179.2% 10Y total return vs MLSS's -80.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.2% revenue growth vs MLSS's -12.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.9% margin vs MLSS's -76.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs MLSS's 0.85 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -24.5% vs MLSS's -52.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs MLSS's -86.6%, ROIC 11.4% vs -121.3% |
MLSS vs SYK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MLSS vs SYK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 2765.1x MLSS's $9M. SYK is the more profitable business, keeping 12.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MLSS's -76.8%. On growth, MLSS holds the edge at +25.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $25.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +63.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -77.0% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -76.8% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.9% | +17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.3% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MLSS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $109.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $120.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.73x | 33.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.25x | 4.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYK leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYK delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MLSS. MLSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYK's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SYK scores 6/9 vs MLSS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -86.6% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -121.3% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -94.2% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $349,054 | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYK five years ago would be worth $11,752 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,945 for MLSS. Over the past 12 months, SYK leads with a -24.5% total return vs MLSS's -52.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYK at 0.8% vs MLSS's -15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +57.6% | -17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.9% | -24.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | +2.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.6% | +17.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.4% | +179.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.2% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SYK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLSS's 0.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SYK currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs MLSS's 43.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.05 | $404.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $284.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.5% | +70.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.7 | 26.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SYK is the only dividend payer here at 1.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $389.62 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 34 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SYK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MLSS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MLSS vs SYK: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLSS or SYK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger pick with 11.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 2% for Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS). Stryker Corporation (SYK) offers the better valuation at 34. 0x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stryker Corporation (SYK) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MLSS or SYK?
Over the past 5 years, Stryker Corporation (SYK) delivered a total return of +17.
5%, compared to -80. 6% for Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SYK returned +179. 2% versus MLSS's -80. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MLSS or SYK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus Milestone Scientific Inc. 's 0. 85β — meaning MLSS is approximately 62% more volatile than SYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 66% for Stryker Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MLSS or SYK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is pulling ahead at 11.
2% versus -12. 2% for Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Milestone Scientific Inc. grew EPS 37. 9% year-over-year, compared to 8. 2% for Stryker Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYK leads at 10. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MLSS or SYK?
Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
9% net margin versus -54. 6% for Milestone Scientific Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYK leads at 19. 5% versus -78. 3% for MLSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MLSS leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MLSS or SYK?
In this comparison, SYK (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MLSS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MLSS or SYK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 1. 2% yield, +179. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +179. 2%, MLSS: -80. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MLSS and SYK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SYK pays a dividend while MLSS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.