Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MLYS vs NKTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MLYS vs NKTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.00B | $1.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $63M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-152M | $-121M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -156.5% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $173M | $15M |
MLYS vs NKTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineralys Therapeut… (MLYS) | 100 | 169.4 | +69.4% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 411.1 | +311.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLYS vs NKTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.77
- EPS growth 37.4%
- 63.3% 10Y total return vs NKTR's -57.6%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.8% vs MLYS's +108.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.5% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs NKTR's -192.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs NKTR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.8% vs MLYS's +108.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -27.0% ROA vs NKTR's -45.2%, ROIC -46.4% vs -75.2% |
MLYS vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MLYS vs NKTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLYS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKTR and MLYS operate at a comparable scale, with $63M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $63M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$171M | -$97M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$152M | -$121M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$136M | -$190M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +86.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -156.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -192.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -51.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.5% | +29.7% |
Valuation Metrics
MLYS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.15x | -8.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 30.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.15x | 15.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MLYS leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MLYS delivers a -27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-28 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MLYS scores 3/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.9% | -3.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.0% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -46.4% | -75.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.7% | -59.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$173M | $71M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $173M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $86M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLYS five years ago would be worth $16,334 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,063 for NKTR. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +783.6% total return vs MLYS's +108.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 94.6% vs MLYS's 23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.7% | +96.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +108.3% | +783.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.4% | +636.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.3% | -69.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.3% | -57.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.1% | +94.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MLYS and NKTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NKTR currently trades 78.1% from its 52-week high vs MLYS's 63.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.65 | $109.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.59 | $7.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.2% | +78.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 52.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 995K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MLYS as "Buy" and NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 56.1% upside for NKTR (target: $133) vs 52.7% for MLYS (target: $46).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $132.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MLYS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MLYS vs NKTR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLYS or NKTR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc.
(MLYS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MLYS or NKTR?
Over the past 5 years, Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc.
(MLYS) delivered a total return of +63. 3%, compared to -69. 4% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MLYS returned +63. 3% versus NKTR's -57. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MLYS or NKTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc.
(MLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 140% more volatile than MLYS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MLYS or NKTR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 37. 4% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MLYS or NKTR?
Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc.
(MLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLYS leads at 0. 0% versus -253. 7% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 86. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MLYS or NKTR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MLYS or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc.
(MLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77)). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MLYS: +63. 3%, NKTR: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MLYS and NKTR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.