MMA vs GENI

For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 4% for Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited (MMA). Analysts rate Genius Sports Limited (GENI) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) delivered a total return of -74.

6%, compared to -86. 9% for Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited (MMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GENI returned -52. 4% versus MMA's -86. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited (MMA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

45β versus Genius Sports Limited's 1. 50β — meaning GENI is approximately 3% more volatile than MMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 10% for Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.

0% versus -63. 4% for Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited (MMA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited grew EPS 30. 3% year-over-year, compared to -63. 0% for Genius Sports Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the more profitable company, earning -16.

7% net margin versus -25. 6% for Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited — meaning it keeps -16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GENI leads at -15. 6% versus -22. 3% for MMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMA leads at 71. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited (MMA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMA: -86. 9%, GENI: -52. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MMA (Consumer Cyclical) and GENI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MMA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.