MMS vs SAIC

For growth investors, Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is the stronger pick with 2. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). Maximus, Inc. (MMS) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maximus, Inc. (MMS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus Science Applications International Corporation at 12. 3x. On forward P/E, Maximus, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Science Applications International Corporation wins at 0. 56x versus Maximus, Inc. 's 0. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) delivered a total return of +14.

8%, compared to -24. 6% for Maximus, Inc. (MMS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAIC returned +104. 4% versus MMS's +35. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

26β versus Maximus, Inc. 's 0. 72β — meaning MMS is approximately 174% more volatile than SAIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 86% for Maximus, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is pulling ahead at 2. 4% versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Maximus, Inc. grew EPS 10. 4% year-over-year, compared to 7. 4% for Science Applications International Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMS leads at 5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 4. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMS leads at 10. 6% versus 7. 1% for SAIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMS leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 56x versus Maximus, Inc. 's 0. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Maximus, Inc. (MMS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 9. 3x for Science Applications International Corporation — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMS: 72. 0% to $110. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Maximus, Inc. (MMS) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 1. 6% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

26), 1. 6% yield, +104. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAIC: +104. 4%, MMS: +35. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MMS (Industrials) and SAIC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.