Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNOV vs ATHA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MNOV vs ATHA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $70M | $17M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $410K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-129M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -32.4% | — |
| Total Debt | $194K | $803K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $69M |
MNOV vs ATHA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MediciNova, Inc. (MNOV) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| Athira Pharma, Inc. (ATHA) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNOV vs ATHA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNOV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.31
- -80.1% 10Y total return vs ATHA's -97.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 8.16x
ATHA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 2.0%
- +81.6% vs MNOV's -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -8.8% revenue growth vs ATHA's -64.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs ATHA's 1.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.6% vs MNOV's -4.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -26.3% ROA vs ATHA's -225.7% |
MNOV vs ATHA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATHA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNOV and ATHA operate at a comparable scale, with $409,657 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $409,657 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | -$110M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$129M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$52M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +24.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNOV and ATHA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70M | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40M | -$30M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.96x | -0.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 171.21x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.69x | 0.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNOV leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNOV delivers a -28.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-29 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ATHA. MNOV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATHA's 0.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNOV scores 3/9 vs ATHA's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.9% | -3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.3% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -85.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.0% | -2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $69M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $194,331 | $803,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNOV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNOV five years ago would be worth $3,488 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $235 for ATHA. Over the past 12 months, ATHA leads with a +81.6% total return vs MNOV's -4.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNOV at -13.2% vs ATHA's -46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | -37.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.0% | +81.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.7% | -84.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.1% | -97.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.1% | -97.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.2% | -46.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MNOV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNOV is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATHA's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNOV currently trades 73.0% from its 52-week high vs ATHA's 51.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.96 | $8.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $2.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.0% | +51.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 38.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 46K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MNOV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ATHA leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
MNOV vs ATHA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — MNOV or ATHA?
Over the past 5 years, MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) delivered a total return of -65. 1%, compared to -97. 7% for Athira Pharma, Inc. (ATHA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNOV returned -80. 5% versus ATHA's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — MNOV or ATHA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Athira Pharma, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning ATHA is approximately 368% more volatile than MNOV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MediciNova, Inc. (MNOV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Athira Pharma, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — MNOV or ATHA?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Athira Pharma, Inc.
grew EPS 2. 0% year-over-year, compared to -4. 3% for MediciNova, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — MNOV or ATHA?
Athira Pharma, Inc.
(ATHA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -29. 3% for MediciNova, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATHA leads at 0. 0% versus -32. 4% for MNOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNOV leads at 7. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — MNOV or ATHA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is MNOV or ATHA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNOV: -80. 5%, ATHA: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between MNOV and ATHA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.