Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNTK vs CGBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
MNTK vs CGBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $203M | $859M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $180M | $168M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $74M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 59.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 54.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $138M | $968M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $30M |
MNTK vs CGBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montauk Renewables,… (MNTK) | 100 | 14.2 | -85.8% |
| Carlyle Secured Len… (CGBD) | 100 | 109.5 | +9.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNTK vs CGBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNTK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.82
- Rev growth 0.4%, EPS growth -82.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.0%
- 0.4% revenue growth vs CGBD's -2.9%
CGBD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 47.8% 10Y total return vs MNTK's -87.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, current ratio 2.67x
- Beta 0.61, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.67x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.4% revenue growth vs CGBD's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.0% margin vs MNTK's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs MNTK's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.9% vs MNTK's -36.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs MNTK's 0.5%, ROIC 3.7% vs 0.9% |
MNTK vs CGBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MNTK vs CGBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CGBD leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNTK and CGBD operate at a comparable scale, with $180M and $168M in trailing revenue. CGBD is the more profitable business, keeping 53.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNTK's 1.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $180M | $168M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $32M | $76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $74M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | -$53M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +59.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +54.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +53.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -54.8% | +62.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CGBD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, CGBD trades at a 94% valuation discount to MNTK's 116.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNTK's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CGBD's 19.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $203M | $859M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $318M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 116.39x | 7.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.05x | 8.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.19x | 19.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 5.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 0.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CGBD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CGBD delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $1 for MNTK. MNTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CGBD's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CGBD scores 6/9 vs MNTK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $114M | $938M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $138M | $968M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.96x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CGBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CGBD five years ago would be worth $14,846 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,493 for MNTK. Over the past 12 months, CGBD leads with a -1.9% total return vs MNTK's -36.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CGBD at 8.0% vs MNTK's -39.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.5% | -2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.6% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.7% | +26.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.1% | +48.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +47.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.4% | +8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CGBD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CGBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTK's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CGBD currently trades 81.3% from its 52-week high vs MNTK's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.78 | $14.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $10.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.1% | +81.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 304K | 785K |
Analyst Outlook
MNTK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNTK as "Hold" and CGBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.3% upside for CGBD (target: $15) vs 12.7% for MNTK (target: $2). CGBD is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.60 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
CGBD leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNTK leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
MNTK vs CGBD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNTK or CGBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Montauk Renewables, Inc.
(MNTK) is the stronger pick with 0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD). Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNTK or CGBD?
On trailing P/E, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Montauk Renewables, Inc. at 116. 4x. On forward P/E, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNTK or CGBD?
Over the past 5 years, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) delivered a total return of +48. 5%, compared to -85. 1% for Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CGBD returned +47. 8% versus MNTK's -87. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNTK or CGBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Montauk Renewables, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning MNTK is approximately 197% more volatile than CGBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 107% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNTK or CGBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Montauk Renewables, Inc.
(MNTK) is pulling ahead at 0. 4% versus -2. 9% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. grew EPS -3. 7% year-over-year, compared to -82. 2% for Montauk Renewables, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNTK or CGBD?
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) is the more profitable company, earning 53. 0% net margin versus 1. 0% for Montauk Renewables, Inc. — meaning it keeps 53. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CGBD leads at 54. 7% versus 2. 3% for MNTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CGBD leads at 59. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNTK or CGBD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Montauk Renewables, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CGBD: 27. 3% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNTK or CGBD?
In this comparison, CGBD (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MNTK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNTK or CGBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61)). Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CGBD: +47. 8%, MNTK: -87. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNTK and CGBD?
These companies operate in different sectors (MNTK (Utilities) and CGBD (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MNTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CGBD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.