Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MNTK vs CGBD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MNTK
Montauk Renewables, Inc.

Diversified Utilities

UtilitiesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$203M
5Y Perf.-85.8%
CGBD
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$859M
5Y Perf.+9.5%

MNTK vs CGBD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MNTK logoMNTK
CGBD logoCGBD
IndustryDiversified UtilitiesAsset Management
Market Cap$203M$859M
Revenue (TTM)$180M$168M
Net Income (TTM)$2M$74M
Gross Margin28.5%59.2%
Operating Margin-0.2%54.7%
Forward P/E13.1x8.1x
Total Debt$138M$968M
Cash & Equiv.$24M$30M

MNTK vs CGBDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MNTK
CGBD
StockJan 21May 26Return
Montauk Renewables,… (MNTK)10014.2-85.8%
Carlyle Secured Len… (CGBD)100109.5+9.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MNTK vs CGBD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CGBD leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Montauk Renewables, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MNTK
Montauk Renewables, Inc.
The Income Pick

MNTK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.82
  • Rev growth 0.4%, EPS growth -82.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.0%
  • 0.4% revenue growth vs CGBD's -2.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CGBD
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CGBD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 47.8% 10Y total return vs MNTK's -87.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, current ratio 2.67x
  • Beta 0.61, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.67x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMNTK logoMNTK0.4% revenue growth vs CGBD's -2.9%
ValueCGBD logoCGBDLower P/E (8.1x vs 13.1x)
Quality / MarginsCGBD logoCGBD53.0% margin vs MNTK's 1.2%
Stability / SafetyCGBD logoCGBDBeta 0.61 vs MNTK's 1.82
DividendsCGBD logoCGBD0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CGBD logoCGBD-1.9% vs MNTK's -36.6%
Efficiency (ROA)CGBD logoCGBD2.9% ROA vs MNTK's 0.5%, ROIC 3.7% vs 0.9%

MNTK vs CGBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MNTKMontauk Renewables, Inc.
FY 2023
Renewable Natural Gas
89.3%$156M
Renewable Electricity Generation
10.7%$19M
CGBDCarlyle Secured Lending, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MNTK vs CGBD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCGBDLAGGINGMNTK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CGBD leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

MNTK and CGBD operate at a comparable scale, with $180M and $168M in trailing revenue. CGBD is the more profitable business, keeping 53.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNTK's 1.2%.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…CGBD logoCGBDCarlyle Secured L…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$180M$168M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$32M$76M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M$74M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$99M-$53M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.5%+59.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-0.2%+54.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.2%+53.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-54.8%+62.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.7%
CGBD leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CGBD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 7.5x trailing earnings, CGBD trades at a 94% valuation discount to MNTK's 116.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNTK's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CGBD's 19.6x.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…CGBD logoCGBDCarlyle Secured L…
Market CapShares × price$203M$859M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$318M$1.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS116.39x7.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.05x8.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.82x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.19x19.59x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.15x5.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.77x0.73x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.24x
CGBD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CGBD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CGBD delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $1 for MNTK. MNTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CGBD's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CGBD scores 6/9 vs MNTK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…CGBD logoCGBDCarlyle Secured L…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.9%+6.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+2.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.9%+3.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.1%+4.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.52x1.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$114M$938M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$24M$30M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$138M$968M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.96x0.95x
CGBD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CGBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CGBD five years ago would be worth $14,846 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,493 for MNTK. Over the past 12 months, CGBD leads with a -1.9% total return vs MNTK's -36.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CGBD at 8.0% vs MNTK's -39.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…CGBD logoCGBDCarlyle Secured L…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-15.5%-2.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-36.6%-1.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.7%+26.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.1%+48.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.9%+47.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-39.4%+8.0%
CGBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CGBD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CGBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTK's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CGBD currently trades 81.3% from its 52-week high vs MNTK's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…CGBD logoCGBDCarlyle Secured L…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.82x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.78$14.49
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.07$10.61
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+51.1%+81.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.057.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded304K785K
CGBD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MNTK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates MNTK as "Hold" and CGBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.3% upside for CGBD (target: $15) vs 12.7% for MNTK (target: $2). CGBD is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…CGBD logoCGBDCarlyle Secured L…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.60$15.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts47
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%0.0%
MNTK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CGBD leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNTK leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallCarlyle Secured Lending, In… (CGBD)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MNTK vs CGBD: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MNTK or CGBD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Montauk Renewables, Inc.

(MNTK) is the stronger pick with 0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD). Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MNTK or CGBD?

On trailing P/E, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.

(CGBD) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Montauk Renewables, Inc. at 116. 4x. On forward P/E, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MNTK or CGBD?

Over the past 5 years, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.

(CGBD) delivered a total return of +48. 5%, compared to -85. 1% for Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CGBD returned +47. 8% versus MNTK's -87. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MNTK or CGBD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.

(CGBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Montauk Renewables, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning MNTK is approximately 197% more volatile than CGBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 107% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MNTK or CGBD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Montauk Renewables, Inc.

(MNTK) is pulling ahead at 0. 4% versus -2. 9% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. grew EPS -3. 7% year-over-year, compared to -82. 2% for Montauk Renewables, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MNTK or CGBD?

Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.

(CGBD) is the more profitable company, earning 53. 0% net margin versus 1. 0% for Montauk Renewables, Inc. — meaning it keeps 53. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CGBD leads at 54. 7% versus 2. 3% for MNTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CGBD leads at 59. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MNTK or CGBD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.

(CGBD) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Montauk Renewables, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CGBD: 27. 3% to $15. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MNTK or CGBD?

In this comparison, CGBD (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. MNTK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MNTK or CGBD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.

(CGBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61)). Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CGBD: +47. 8%, MNTK: -87. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MNTK and CGBD?

These companies operate in different sectors (MNTK (Utilities) and CGBD (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MNTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CGBD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MNTK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CGBD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MNTK and CGBD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MNTK: 9.0% · CGBD: -2.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MNTK: 116.4x · CGBD: 7.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.