Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MNTK vs CLNE vs UGI vs OPAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
MNTK vs CLNE vs UGI vs OPAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $203M | $507M | $6.94B | $54M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $180M | $439M | $7.36B | $349M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-99M | $641M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 11.7% | 30.3% | 28.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 7.4% | 15.4% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | — | 10.6x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $138M | $99M | $7.56B | $365M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $158M | $355M | $24M |
MNTK vs CLNE vs UGI vs OPAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montauk Renewables,… (MNTK) | 100 | 14.6 | -85.4% |
| Clean Energy Fuels … (CLNE) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| UGI Corporation (UGI) | 100 | 70.2 | -29.8% |
| OPAL Fuels Inc. (OPAL) | 100 | 24.0 | -76.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNTK vs CLNE vs UGI vs OPAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNTK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CLNE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 2.32x
- +44.4% vs MNTK's -36.6%
UGI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 4.5%
- 9.6% 10Y total return vs CLNE's -26.9%
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 15.6x)
- 8.7% margin vs CLNE's -22.7%
OPAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- Beta 1.58, yield 15.3%, current ratio 1.18x
- 16.3% revenue growth vs MNTK's 0.4%
- 15.3% yield, vs UGI's 4.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% revenue growth vs MNTK's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 15.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.7% margin vs CLNE's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs MNTK's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 15.3% yield, vs UGI's 4.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.4% vs MNTK's -36.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs CLNE's -9.2%, ROIC 7.1% vs -9.4% |
MNTK vs CLNE vs UGI vs OPAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNTK vs CLNE vs UGI vs OPAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UGI leads in 4 of 6 categories
MNTK leads 0 • CLNE leads 0 • OPAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UGI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UGI is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.4B annually — 40.8x MNTK's $180M. UGI is the more profitable business, keeping 8.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLNE's -22.7%. On growth, OPAL holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $180M | $439M | $7.4B | $349M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $32M | $62M | $1.7B | $28M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$99M | $641M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | $19M | $629M | -$34M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +11.7% | +30.3% | +28.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +7.4% | +15.4% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | -22.7% | +8.7% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -54.8% | +4.3% | +8.5% | -9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.0% | +13.3% | +0.7% | +24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +90.0% | +6.4% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLNE and UGI and OPAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, UGI trades at a 91% valuation discount to MNTK's 116.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UGI's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLNE's 94.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $203M | $507M | $6.9B | $54M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $318M | $448M | $14.1B | $395M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 116.39x | -2.29x | 10.46x | 15.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.05x | — | 10.62x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.56x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.19x | 94.64x | 8.48x | 14.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 1.19x | 0.95x | 0.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 0.90x | 1.48x | 0.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.47x | 17.80x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UGI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UGI delivers a 12.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-17 for CLNE. CLNE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UGI's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLNE scores 5/9 vs MNTK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | -17.2% | +12.8% | +3.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | -9.2% | +4.1% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | -9.4% | +7.1% | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | -9.4% | +8.3% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.18x | 1.58x | 0.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $114M | -$59M | $7.2B | $341M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $158M | $355M | $24M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $138M | $99M | $7.6B | $365M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.96x | -1.07x | 2.69x | 0.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UGI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UGI five years ago would be worth $8,689 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,493 for MNTK. Over the past 12 months, CLNE leads with a +44.4% total return vs MNTK's -36.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UGI at 6.9% vs MNTK's -39.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.5% | +6.9% | -13.1% | -1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.6% | +44.4% | +0.7% | -0.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.7% | -46.3% | +22.3% | -64.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.1% | -73.8% | -13.1% | -76.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | -26.9% | +9.6% | -76.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.4% | -18.7% | +6.9% | -29.2% |
Risk & Volatility
UGI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UGI is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTK's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UGI currently trades 78.2% from its 52-week high vs MNTK's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 1.19x | 0.27x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.78 | $3.11 | $41.34 | $4.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $1.56 | $31.62 | $1.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.1% | +74.3% | +78.2% | +57.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 44.6 | 37.1 | 48.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 304K | 1.3M | 1.5M | 198K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNTK and OPAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNTK as "Hold", CLNE as "Buy", UGI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.5% upside for CLNE (target: $4) vs 12.7% for MNTK (target: $2). For income investors, OPAL offers the higher dividend yield at 15.29% vs UGI's 4.55%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.60 | $3.50 | $42.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 22 | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +4.5% | +15.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.47 | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +1.6% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
UGI leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
MNTK vs CLNE vs UGI vs OPAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNTK or CLNE or UGI or OPAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, OPAL Fuels Inc.
(OPAL) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK). UGI Corporation (UGI) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNTK or CLNE or UGI or OPAL?
On trailing P/E, UGI Corporation (UGI) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus Montauk Renewables, Inc. at 116. 4x. On forward P/E, UGI Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNTK or CLNE or UGI or OPAL?
Over the past 5 years, UGI Corporation (UGI) delivered a total return of -13.
1%, compared to -85. 1% for Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UGI returned +9. 6% versus MNTK's -87. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNTK or CLNE or UGI or OPAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UGI Corporation (UGI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Montauk Renewables, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning MNTK is approximately 585% more volatile than UGI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 158% for UGI Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNTK or CLNE or UGI or OPAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), OPAL Fuels Inc.
(OPAL) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus 0. 4% for Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OPAL Fuels Inc. grew EPS 638. 9% year-over-year, compared to -173. 0% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPAL leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNTK or CLNE or UGI or OPAL?
UGI Corporation (UGI) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
3% net margin versus -52. 3% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. — meaning it keeps 9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UGI leads at 15. 2% versus -22. 1% for CLNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UGI leads at 49. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNTK or CLNE or UGI or OPAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UGI Corporation (UGI) trades at 10.
6x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Montauk Renewables, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLNE: 51. 5% to $3. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNTK or CLNE or UGI or OPAL?
In this comparison, OPAL (15.
3% yield), UGI (4. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MNTK, CLNE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNTK or CLNE or UGI or OPAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UGI Corporation (UGI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 4. 5% yield). Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UGI: +9. 6%, MNTK: -87. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNTK and CLNE and UGI and OPAL?
These companies operate in different sectors (MNTK (Utilities) and CLNE (Energy) and UGI (Utilities) and OPAL (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MNTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; OPAL is a small-cap high-growth stock. UGI, OPAL pay a dividend while MNTK, CLNE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.