Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MNTK
Montauk Renewables, Inc.

Diversified Utilities

UtilitiesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$203M
5Y Perf.-65.9%
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$281.02B
5Y Perf.+664.7%
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.36B
5Y Perf.-9.0%
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.29B
5Y Perf.-21.5%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$62.18B
5Y Perf.+2201.1%

MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MNTK logoMNTK
GEV logoGEV
PLUG logoPLUG
MHK logoMHK
BE logoBE
IndustryDiversified UtilitiesRenewable UtilitiesElectrical Equipment & PartsFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesElectrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$203M$281.02B$4.36B$6.29B$62.18B
Revenue (TTM)$180M$39.38B$710M$10.99B$2.45B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$9.38B$-1.63B$414M$6M
Gross Margin28.5%19.9%99.8%24.3%31.1%
Operating Margin-0.2%3.9%38.1%4.9%8.2%
Forward P/E13.1x37.6x11.2x123.6x
Total Debt$138M$0.00$997M$2.76B$2.99B
Cash & Equiv.$24M$8.85B$1M$856M$2.45B

MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MNTK
GEV
PLUG
MHK
BE
StockMar 24May 26Return
Montauk Renewables,… (MNTK)10034.1-65.9%
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV)100764.7+664.7%
Plug Power Inc. (PLUG)10091.0-9.0%
Mohawk Industries, … (MHK)10078.5-21.5%
Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE)1002301.1+2201.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GEV leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Mohawk Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. BE also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MNTK
Montauk Renewables, Inc.
The Value Angle

MNTK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: utilities exposure
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
The Income Pick

GEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.76, yield 0.1%
  • Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 217.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
  • Beta 1.76, yield 0.1%, current ratio 0.98x
  • 23.8% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MHK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
  • Lower P/E (11.2x vs 123.6x)
  • Beta 1.34 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

BE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 9.3% 10Y total return vs GEV's 7.0%
  • 37.3% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5%
  • +14.6% vs MNTK's -36.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBE logoBE37.3% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5%
ValueMHK logoMHKLower P/E (11.2x vs 123.6x)
Quality / MarginsGEV logoGEV23.8% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
Stability / SafetyMHK logoMHKBeta 1.34 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage
DividendsGEV logoGEV0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BE logoBE+14.6% vs MNTK's -36.6%
Efficiency (ROA)GEV logoGEV15.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 27.9% vs 10.9%

MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MNTKMontauk Renewables, Inc.
FY 2023
Renewable Natural Gas
89.3%$156M
Renewable Electricity Generation
10.7%$19M
GEVGE Vernova Inc.
FY 2025
Product
55.0%$20.9B
Service
45.0%$17.1B
PLUGPlug Power Inc.
FY 2025
Sale Of Electrolyzers
26.5%$188M
Fuel Delivered To Customers
18.8%$133M
Power Purchase Agreements
15.2%$108M
Sale of cryogenic equipment
13.5%$96M
Services Performed On Fuel Cell Systems And Related Infrastructure
13.3%$94M
Sales Of Fuel Cell Systems
7.6%$54M
Sale Of Hydrogen Infrastructure
3.8%$27M
Other (2)
1.4%$10M
MHKMohawk Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Global Ceramic Segment
43.5%$4.2B
Carpet And Resilient
38.5%$3.7B
Laminate and Wood
18.1%$1.8B
BEBloom Energy Corporation
FY 2025
Product
75.6%$1.5B
Service
11.3%$228M
Installation
10.2%$206M
Electricity
3.0%$60M

MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGEVLAGGINGPLUG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — GEV and PLUG and BE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 218.5x MNTK's $180M. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$180M$39.4B$710M$11.0B$2.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$32M$2.2B-$1.5B$1.2B$240M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M$9.4B-$1.6B$414M$6M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$99M$3.6B-$2M$709M$233M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.5%+19.9%+99.8%+24.3%+31.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-0.2%+3.9%+38.1%+4.9%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.2%+23.8%-2.3%+3.8%+0.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-54.8%+9.2%-0.3%+6.5%+9.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.0%+16.1%+17.6%+8.0%+130.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.2%+95.9%+65.2%+3.3%
Evenly matched — GEV and PLUG and BE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MHK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.3x trailing earnings, MHK trades at a 85% valuation discount to MNTK's 116.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MHK's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Market CapShares × price$203M$281.0B$4.4B$6.3B$62.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$318M$272.2B$5.4B$8.2B$62.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS116.39x59.12x17.33x-699.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.05x37.62x11.23x123.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.19x121.45x7.05x508.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.15x7.38x6.14x0.58x30.72x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.77x23.47x0.77x78.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF75.73x10.20x1087.24x
MHK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. MHK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs MNTK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.9%+79.7%-124.4%+5.0%+0.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+15.2%-64.3%+3.0%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.9%+27.9%+10.9%+3.9%+4.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.1%+6.6%+18.6%+4.8%+2.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936564
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.52x19.75x0.33x3.77x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$114M-$8.8B$996M$1.9B$538M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$24M$8.8B$1M$856M$2.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$138M$0$997M$2.8B$3.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.96x-36.18x36.90x1.05x
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,358 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs MNTK's -36.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs MNTK's -39.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-15.5%+54.0%+40.4%-6.2%+162.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-36.6%+157.4%+303.6%+1.9%+1464.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.7%+698.3%-66.3%+2.9%+1425.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.1%+698.3%-86.4%-55.3%+1013.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.9%+698.3%+62.2%-47.6%+934.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-39.4%+99.9%-30.4%+0.9%+148.0%
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GEV and MHK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MHK is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs MNTK's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.82x1.76x2.57x1.34x3.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.78$1181.95$4.58$143.13$302.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.07$387.03$0.69$93.60$16.18
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+51.1%+88.5%+68.3%+71.8%+85.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.066.563.350.672.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded304K2.4M76.5M1.1M10.1M
Evenly matched — GEV and MHK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GEV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MNTK as "Hold", GEV as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", MHK as "Hold", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for MHK (target: $130) vs -27.5% for BE (target: $188).

MetricMNTK logoMNTKMontauk Renewable…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.60$1119.95$3.91$130.00$187.56
# AnalystsCovering analysts428383231
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1100
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.00$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+1.2%0.0%+2.4%0.0%
GEV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). MHK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallGE Vernova Inc. (GEV)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger pick with 37.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

On trailing P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus Montauk Renewables, Inc. at 116. 4x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -86.

4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus MNTK's -87. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 170% more volatile than MHK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is pulling ahead at 37.

3% versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

GE Vernova Inc.

(GEV) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 8% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus 2. 3% for MNTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 123. 6x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 112. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MHK: 26. 5% to $130. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, GE Vernova Inc.

(GEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+698. 3% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GEV: +698. 3%, PLUG: +62. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MNTK and GEV and PLUG and MHK and BE?

These companies operate in different sectors (MNTK (Utilities) and GEV (Utilities) and PLUG (Industrials) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MNTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MNTK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GEV

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PLUG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MHK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 65%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MNTK and GEV and PLUG and MHK and BE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MNTK: 9.0% · GEV: 16.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MNTK: 116.4x · GEV: 59.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.