Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Electrical Equipment & Parts
MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Renewable Utilities | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $203M | $281.02B | $4.36B | $6.29B | $62.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $180M | $39.38B | $710M | $10.99B | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $9.38B | $-1.63B | $414M | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 19.9% | 99.8% | 24.3% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 3.9% | 38.1% | 4.9% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 37.6x | — | 11.2x | 123.6x |
| Total Debt | $138M | $0.00 | $997M | $2.76B | $2.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $8.85B | $1M | $856M | $2.45B |
MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montauk Renewables,… (MNTK) | 100 | 34.1 | -65.9% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 764.7 | +664.7% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 91.0 | -9.0% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 78.5 | -21.5% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 2301.1 | +2201.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNTK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.76, yield 0.1%
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 217.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Beta 1.76, yield 0.1%, current ratio 0.98x
- 23.8% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MHK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 123.6x)
- Beta 1.34 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage
BE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs GEV's 7.0%
- 37.3% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5%
- +14.6% vs MNTK's -36.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.3% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 123.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.34 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs MNTK's -36.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 27.9% vs 10.9% |
MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories
MHK leads 1 • BE leads 1 • MNTK leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GEV and PLUG and BE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 218.5x MNTK's $180M. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $180M | $39.4B | $710M | $11.0B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $32M | $2.2B | -$1.5B | $1.2B | $240M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $9.4B | -$1.6B | $414M | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | $3.6B | -$2M | $709M | $233M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +19.9% | +99.8% | +24.3% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +3.9% | +38.1% | +4.9% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +23.8% | -2.3% | +3.8% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -54.8% | +9.2% | -0.3% | +6.5% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.0% | +16.1% | +17.6% | +8.0% | +130.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +18.2% | +95.9% | +65.2% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MHK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, MHK trades at a 85% valuation discount to MNTK's 116.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MHK's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $203M | $281.0B | $4.4B | $6.3B | $62.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $318M | $272.2B | $5.4B | $8.2B | $62.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 116.39x | 59.12x | — | 17.33x | -699.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.05x | 37.62x | — | 11.23x | 123.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.19x | 121.45x | — | 7.05x | 508.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 7.38x | 6.14x | 0.58x | 30.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 23.47x | — | 0.77x | 78.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 75.73x | — | 10.20x | 1087.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. MHK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs MNTK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +79.7% | -124.4% | +5.0% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +15.2% | -64.3% | +3.0% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +27.9% | +10.9% | +3.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +6.6% | +18.6% | +4.8% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | — | 19.75x | 0.33x | 3.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $114M | -$8.8B | $996M | $1.9B | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $8.8B | $1M | $856M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $138M | $0 | $997M | $2.8B | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.96x | — | -36.18x | 36.90x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,358 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs MNTK's -36.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs MNTK's -39.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.5% | +54.0% | +40.4% | -6.2% | +162.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.6% | +157.4% | +303.6% | +1.9% | +1464.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.7% | +698.3% | -66.3% | +2.9% | +1425.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.1% | +698.3% | -86.4% | -55.3% | +1013.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +698.3% | +62.2% | -47.6% | +934.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.4% | +99.9% | -30.4% | +0.9% | +148.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GEV and MHK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MHK is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs MNTK's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 1.76x | 2.57x | 1.34x | 3.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.78 | $1181.95 | $4.58 | $143.13 | $302.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $387.03 | $0.69 | $93.60 | $16.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.1% | +88.5% | +68.3% | +71.8% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 66.5 | 63.3 | 50.6 | 72.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 304K | 2.4M | 76.5M | 1.1M | 10.1M |
Analyst Outlook
GEV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNTK as "Hold", GEV as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", MHK as "Hold", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for MHK (target: $130) vs -27.5% for BE (target: $188).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.60 | $1119.95 | $3.91 | $130.00 | $187.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 28 | 38 | 32 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | — | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +2.4% | 0.0% |
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). MHK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MNTK vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger pick with 37.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?
On trailing P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus Montauk Renewables, Inc. at 116. 4x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -86.
4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus MNTK's -87. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 170% more volatile than MHK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is pulling ahead at 37.
3% versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?
GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 8% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus 2. 3% for MNTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 123. 6x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 112. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MHK: 26. 5% to $130. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MNTK or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+698. 3% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GEV: +698. 3%, PLUG: +62. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNTK and GEV and PLUG and MHK and BE?
These companies operate in different sectors (MNTK (Utilities) and GEV (Utilities) and PLUG (Industrials) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MNTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.