MOBX
Mobix Labs, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$13M
5Y Perf.-97.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MOBX vs SLAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLAB
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$7.17B
5Y Perf.+38.0%
MOBX vs SLAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MOBX | SLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $13M | $7.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-36M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 45.3% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | -469.1% | -9.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 80.3x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $364M |
MOBX vs SLAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MOBX
SLAB
| Stock | Aug 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobix Labs, Inc. (MOBX) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 138.0 | +38.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOBX vs SLAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SLAB leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Mobix Labs, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MOBX
Mobix Labs, Inc.
The Income Pick
MOBX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.93
- Rev growth 53.9%, EPS growth -71.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 44.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, current ratio 0.24x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SLAB
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
SLAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 374.6% 10Y total return vs MOBX's -97.9%
- -8.3% margin vs MOBX's -422.6%
- +95.8% vs MOBX's -72.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MOBX | 53.9% revenue growth vs SLAB's 34.3% |
| Quality / Margins | SLAB | -8.3% margin vs MOBX's -422.6% |
| Stability / Safety | MOBX | Beta 0.93 vs SLAB's 1.20 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SLAB | +95.8% vs MOBX's -72.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SLAB | -5.1% ROA vs MOBX's -103.4%, ROIC -6.9% vs -499.5% |
MOBX vs SLAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
MOBX vs SLAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSLABLAGGINGMOBX
MOBXMobix Labs, Inc.
0leads
SLABSilicon Laboratories …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MOBXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SLAB6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SLAB7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SLAB6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $785M annually — 91.1x MOBX's $9M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -8.3% (SLAB) to -4.2% (MOBX). On growth, SLAB holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MOBXMobix Labs, Inc. | SLABSilicon Laborator… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$39M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$36M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.3% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | -9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | -8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -162.1% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.8% | +25.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.7% | +88.8% |
SLAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MOBX and SLAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MOBXMobix Labs, Inc. | SLABSilicon Laborator… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | -109.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 80.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.35x | 9.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 108.93x |
Evenly matched — MOBX and SLAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLAB leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLAB delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-29 for MOBX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLAB scores 5/9 vs MOBX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MOBXMobix Labs, Inc. | SLABSilicon Laborator… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -103.4% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.0% | -6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | -6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$364M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $364M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.54x | -58.63x |
SLAB leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SLAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLAB five years ago would be worth $17,055 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $208 for MOBX. Over the past 12 months, SLAB leads with a +95.8% total return vs MOBX's -72.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLAB at 16.7% vs MOBX's -73.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MOBXMobix Labs, Inc. | SLABSilicon Laborator… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.9% | +64.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.2% | +95.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | +58.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +70.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +374.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.9% | +16.7% |
SLAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOBX and SLAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOBX is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLAB's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs MOBX's 13.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MOBXMobix Labs, Inc. | SLABSilicon Laborator… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.40 | $218.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $109.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.9% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.4 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 457K |
Evenly matched — MOBX and SLAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | MOBXMobix Labs, Inc. | SLABSilicon Laborator… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $211.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SLAB leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallSilicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MOBX vs SLAB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOBX or SLAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mobix Labs, Inc.
(MOBX) is the stronger pick with 53. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 34. 3% for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB). Analysts rate Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MOBX or SLAB?
Over the past 5 years, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) delivered a total return of +70. 5%, compared to -97. 9% for Mobix Labs, Inc. (MOBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLAB returned +374. 6% versus MOBX's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MOBX or SLAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mobix Labs, Inc.
(MOBX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Silicon Laboratories Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning SLAB is approximately 29% more volatile than MOBX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MOBX or SLAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mobix Labs, Inc.
(MOBX) is pulling ahead at 53. 9% versus 34. 3% for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silicon Laboratories Inc. grew EPS 66. 6% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for Mobix Labs, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MOBX leads at 44. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MOBX or SLAB?
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the more profitable company, earning -8. 3% net margin versus -465. 4% for Mobix Labs, Inc. — meaning it keeps -8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLAB leads at -9. 0% versus -439. 6% for MOBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLAB leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MOBX or SLAB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MOBX or SLAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), +374. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLAB: +374. 6%, MOBX: -97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MOBX and SLAB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MOBX: -40.8% · SLAB: 25.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.