MODD vs MASI

Analysts rate Modular Medical, Inc.

(MODD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Masimo Corporation (MASI) delivered a total return of -20.

4%, compared to -96. 5% for Modular Medical, Inc. (MODD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MASI returned +282. 9% versus MODD's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Masimo Corporation (MASI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

63β versus Modular Medical, Inc. 's 1. 41β — meaning MODD is approximately 124% more volatile than MASI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Modular Medical, Inc. (MODD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 78% for Masimo Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Masimo Corporation grew EPS 51.

0% year-over-year, compared to 34. 6% for Modular Medical, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Modular Medical, Inc.

(MODD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -9. 9% for Masimo Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MASI leads at 20. 5% versus 0. 0% for MODD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MASI leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Masimo Corporation (MASI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

63), +282. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MASI: +282. 9%, MODD: -96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.