Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MOMO vs IQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
MOMO vs IQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $2.16B | $1.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.29B | $27.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $800M | $-390M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 1.7% |
| Forward P/E | 1.1x | 4.8x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $14.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.44B | $3.53B |
MOMO vs IQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | 100 | 7.3 | -92.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOMO vs IQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 4.6%
- Rev growth -5.9%, EPS growth -17.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.9%
- -9.4% 10Y total return vs IQ's -92.2%
In this particular matchup, IQ is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.9% revenue growth vs IQ's -8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 4.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs IQ's -1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs IQ's 1.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.2% vs IQ's -36.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs IQ's -0.9%, ROIC 10.9% vs 5.8% |
MOMO vs IQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOMO vs IQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.1B annually — 2.6x MOMO's $10.3B. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IQ's -1.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.3B | $27.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $800M | -$390M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $685M | $466M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +21.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | -1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.1% | -7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.1% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MOMO and IQ each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, MOMO trades at a 13% valuation discount to IQ's 10.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOMO's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IQ's 10.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.34x | 10.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.08x | 4.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.91x | 10.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.46x | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 0.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.90x | 4.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-3 for IQ. MOMO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQ's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOMO scores 7/9 vs IQ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.2% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5.3B | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.4B | $3.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $14.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.04x | 0.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOMO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $6,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $881 for IQ. Over the past 12 months, MOMO leads with a +16.2% total return vs IQ's -36.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOMO at -1.9% vs IQ's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.6% | -40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.2% | -36.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.7% | -79.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.7% | -91.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | -92.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.9% | -41.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MOMO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IQ's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 68.8% from its 52-week high vs IQ's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.22 | $2.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.68 | $1.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.8% | +42.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 648K | 11.1M |
Analyst Outlook
IQ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MOMO as "Buy" and IQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.5% upside for IQ (target: $2) vs 27.8% for MOMO (target: $8). MOMO is the only dividend payer here at 4.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.10 | $2.16 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.99 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.1% | 0.0% |
MOMO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQ leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
MOMO vs IQ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOMO or IQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger pick with -5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOMO or IQ?
On trailing P/E, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus iQIYI, Inc. at 10. 7x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOMO or IQ?
Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) delivered a total return of -36. 7%, compared to -91. 2% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOMO returned -9. 4% versus IQ's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOMO or IQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus iQIYI, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning IQ is approximately 82% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 106% for iQIYI, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOMO or IQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is pulling ahead at -5. 9% versus -8. 3% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hello Group Inc. grew EPS -17. 2% year-over-year, compared to -60. 7% for iQIYI, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQ leads at -1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOMO or IQ?
Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus 2. 6% for iQIYI, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 12. 7% versus 6. 2% for IQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MOMO leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOMO or IQ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 4. 8x for iQIYI, Inc. — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQ: 78. 5% to $2. 16.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOMO or IQ?
In this comparison, MOMO (4.
6% yield) pays a dividend. IQ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MOMO or IQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 4. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9. 4%, IQ: -92. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOMO and IQ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MOMO pays a dividend while IQ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.