MOV
Movado Group, Inc.
Luxury Goods
Market Cap$632M
5Y Perf.+162.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MOV vs RL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$47.87B
5Y Perf.+368.2%
MOV vs RL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MOV | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $632M | $47.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $671M | $7.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $919M |
| Gross Margin | 54.2% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 15.0% |
| Forward P/E | 24.3x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $2.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $231M | $1.92B |
MOV vs RL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MOV
RL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) | 100 | 262.6 | +162.6% |
| Ralph Lauren Corpor… (RL) | 100 | 468.2 | +368.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOV vs RL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: RL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Movado Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MOV
Movado Group, Inc.
The Income Pick
MOV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 4.58x
- Beta 1.38, yield 5.0%, current ratio 4.58x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
The Growth Play
RL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 19.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 319.2% 10Y total return vs MOV's 36.8%
- 6.7% revenue growth vs MOV's 2.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RL | 6.7% revenue growth vs MOV's 2.7% |
| Value | RL | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 24.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | RL | 11.7% margin vs MOV's 4.0% |
| Stability / Safety | MOV | Beta 1.38 vs RL's 1.50, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MOV | 5.0% yield, vs RL's 0.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MOV | +98.5% vs RL's +48.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RL | 11.8% ROA vs MOV's 3.6%, ROIC 20.6% vs 6.3% |
MOV vs RL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2026
FY 2020
MOV vs RL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMOVLAGGINGRL
RLRalph Lauren Corporat…
2leads
MOVMovado Group, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RLMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
RL5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MOV5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
RL4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
MOV2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RL is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 11.7x MOV's $671M. RL is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOV's 4.0%.
| Metric | MOVMovado Group, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $671M | $7.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $919M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $53M | $695M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.2% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +15.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.8% | +24.7% |
RL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MOV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.6x trailing earnings, MOV trades at a 23% valuation discount to RL's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOV's 11.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RL's 42.2x.
| Metric | MOVMovado Group, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $632M | $47.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $459M | $48.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.57x | 30.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.32x | 21.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.70x | 42.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 6.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 8.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.83x | 46.98x |
MOV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MOV and RL each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RL delivers a 31.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $5 for MOV. MOV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RL's 1.03x.
| Metric | MOVMovado Group, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.4% | +31.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +20.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$172M | $746M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $231M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 67.12x | 23.25x |
Evenly matched — MOV and RL each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RL five years ago would be worth $26,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,072 for MOV. Over the past 12 months, MOV leads with a +98.5% total return vs RL's +48.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RL at 48.2% vs MOV's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MOVMovado Group, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.9% | -2.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +98.5% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +225.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | +164.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.8% | +319.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +48.2% |
RL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOV is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RL's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOV currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs RL's 89.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MOVMovado Group, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.24 | $393.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.18 | $237.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 143K | 532K |
MOV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MOV and RL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MOV as "Hold" and RL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for RL (target: $429) vs 8.8% for MOV (target: $30). For income investors, MOV offers the higher dividend yield at 4.98% vs RL's 0.89%.
| Metric | MOVMovado Group, Inc. | RLRalph Lauren Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $428.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.0% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.37 | $3.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
Evenly matched — MOV and RL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
RL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MOV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
Best OverallMovado Group, Inc. (MOV)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MOV vs RL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOV or RL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the stronger pick with 6.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Movado Group, Inc. (MOV). Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOV or RL?
On trailing P/E, Movado Group, Inc.
(MOV) is the cheapest at 23. 6x versus Ralph Lauren Corporation at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Ralph Lauren Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOV or RL?
Over the past 5 years, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) delivered a total return of +164.
4%, compared to +10. 7% for Movado Group, Inc. (MOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RL returned +319. 2% versus MOV's +36. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOV or RL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Movado Group, Inc.
(MOV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 38β versus Ralph Lauren Corporation's 1. 50β — meaning RL is approximately 9% more volatile than MOV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 103% for Ralph Lauren Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOV or RL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is pulling ahead at 6.
7% versus 2. 7% for Movado Group, Inc. (MOV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Movado Group, Inc. grew EPS 44. 4% year-over-year, compared to 19. 4% for Ralph Lauren Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RL leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOV or RL?
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus 4. 0% for Movado Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RL leads at 13. 2% versus 4. 4% for MOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RL leads at 68. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOV or RL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) trades at 21.
7x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Movado Group, Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RL: 21. 3% to $428. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOV or RL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) offers the highest yield at 5. 0%, versus 0. 9% for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL).
09Is MOV or RL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
9% yield, +319. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RL: +319. 2%, MOV: +36. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOV and RL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MOV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MOV: 9.7% · RL: 12.2%)Net Margin>
%
(MOV: 4.0% · RL: 11.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MOV: 23.6x · RL: 30.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.