Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MPB vs FXNC vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
MPB vs FXNC vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $868M | $273M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $115M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56M | $18M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 74.7% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 19.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 12.8x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $59M | $43M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $161M | $10.27B |
MPB vs FXNC vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB) | 100 | 185.9 | +85.9% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPB vs FXNC vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPB is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 12.8x)
FXNC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 258.5% 10Y total return vs MPB's 164.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 0.10x
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- PEG 2.26 vs FXNC's 8.59
- 27.8% margin vs FXNC's 15.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 12.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs FXNC's 15.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs MPB's 0.72 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs FXNC's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.7% |
MPB vs FXNC vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MPB vs FXNC vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 427.4x FXNC's $115M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FXNC's 15.4%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $115M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $25M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56M | $18M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $21M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +74.7% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +19.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +15.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +18.2% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.3% | +7.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MPB and FXNC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, MPB trades at a 51% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.43x vs FXNC's 10.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $868M | $273M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $881M | $155M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.44x | 15.40x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.81x | 12.82x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 10.32x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 7.05x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 2.43x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.46x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.28x | 12.99x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FXNC scores 7/9 vs MPB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | +10.0% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.9% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +7.7% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +9.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.23x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$118M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $161M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $59M | $43M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.57x | 0.84x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FXNC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FXNC five years ago would be worth $17,101 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,577 for MPB. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +57.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FXNC at 26.8% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +24.4% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +57.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.2% | +103.7% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | +71.0% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.5% | +258.5% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +26.8% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FXNC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPB's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.52x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.22 | $30.51 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.02 | $18.31 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +99.0% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 67.0 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 79K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -30.4% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs FXNC's 2.03%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $21.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +2.0% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $0.61 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.1% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FXNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MPB vs FXNC vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPB or FXNC or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPB or FXNC or KO?
On trailing P/E, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
(MPB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 26x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or FXNC or KO?
Over the past 5 years, First National Corporation (FXNC) delivered a total return of +71.
0%, compared to +35. 8% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +258. 5% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPB or FXNC or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 72β — meaning MPB is approximately -460% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPB or FXNC or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPB or FXNC or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 15. 8% for First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 19. 6% for FXNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPB or FXNC or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 26x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPB or FXNC or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 2. 0% for First National Corporation (FXNC).
09Is MPB or FXNC or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MPB: +164. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPB and FXNC and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.