Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MPV vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
MPV vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $186M | $243M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 92.5% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | 90.9% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $20M |
MPV vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barings Participati… (MPV) | 100 | 140.2 | +40.2% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPV vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 8.3%
- 101.9% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 93.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 14.1%, current ratio 1.83x
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs MPV's 0.9%
- Lower P/E (6.5x vs 10.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs MPV's 0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 10.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TPVG's 0.1% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TPVG's 17.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs MPV's +9.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TPVG's 0.1% |
MPV vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPV leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG is the larger business by revenue, generating $97M annually — 4.8x MPV's $20M. MPV is the more profitable business, keeping 84.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPVG's 50.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.5% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +90.9% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +84.9% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.7% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 54% valuation discount to MPV's 10.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TPVG's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPV's 11.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $186M | $243M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $203M | $691M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.73x | 4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.03x | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.18x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.43x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPV leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPV delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. MPV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs MPV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.5% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.9% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.55x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPV five years ago would be worth $17,360 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs MPV's +9.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPV at 22.8% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.7% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.5% | +19.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.1% | -3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.6% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.9% | +93.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.8% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MPV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPV is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MPV currently trades 82.7% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.40x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.00 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.65 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.6 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 504K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MPV and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs MPV's 8.31%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.3% | +17.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.44 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MPV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TPVG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MPV vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPV or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 9% for Barings Participation Investors (MPV). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPV or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Barings Participation Investors at 10. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPV or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Barings Participation Investors (MPV) delivered a total return of +73.
6%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPV returned +101. 9% versus TPVG's +93. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPV or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Barings Participation Investors (MPV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
40β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 107% more volatile than MPV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Barings Participation Investors (MPV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPV or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 0. 9% for Barings Participation Investors (MPV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -5. 3% for Barings Participation Investors. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPV or TPVG?
Barings Participation Investors (MPV) is the more profitable company, earning 84.
9% net margin versus 50. 6% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — meaning it keeps 84. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPV leads at 90. 9% versus 77. 9% for TPVG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPV leads at 92. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MPV or TPVG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 17. 1%, versus 8. 3% for Barings Participation Investors (MPV).
08Is MPV or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Barings Participation Investors (MPV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
40), 8. 3% yield, +101. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPV: +101. 9%, TPVG: +93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MPV and TPVG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MPV is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.