MPX vs GNRC

For growth investors, Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the stronger pick with 3.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Marine Products Corporation (MPX) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the cheapest at 24.

6x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 4x. On forward P/E, Marine Products Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Generac Holdings Inc.

(GNRC) delivered a total return of -15. 9%, compared to -32. 5% for Marine Products Corporation (MPX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +668. 7% versus MPX's +75. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

00β versus Generac Holdings Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning GNRC is approximately 70% more volatile than MPX relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is pulling ahead at 3.

3% versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marine Products Corporation grew EPS -34. 0% year-over-year, compared to -50. 1% for Generac Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GNRC leads at -2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

7% net margin versus 3. 8% for Generac Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GNRC leads at 6. 9% versus 5. 7% for MPX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Marine Products Corporation (MPX) trades at 16.

2x forward P/E versus 31. 0x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, MPX (6.

9% yield) pays a dividend. GNRC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

00), 6. 9% yield). Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPX: +75. 6%, GNRC: +668. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MPX (Consumer Cyclical) and GNRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MPX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MPX pays a dividend while GNRC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.