REIT - Residential
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MRP vs PINE vs KO vs NNN vs NTST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
MRP vs PINE vs KO vs NNN vs NTST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Retail | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.49B | $289M | $355.61B | $8.86B | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $713M | $65M | $49.28B | $936M | $193M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $463M | $-415K | $13.70B | $387M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 96.9% | -4.1% | 61.7% | 81.4% | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 85.1% | 28.0% | 29.3% | 63.3% | 31.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 38.8x | 25.3x | 23.0x | 68.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.11B | $394M | $45.49B | $4.82B | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $5M | $10.27B | $5M | $14M |
MRP vs PINE vs KO vs NNN vs NTST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Millrose Properties… (MRP) | 100 | 127.4 | +27.4% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 121.5 | +21.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 109.8 | +9.8% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRP vs PINE vs KO vs NNN vs NTST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 7.6% FFO/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 23.0x)
- 65.0% margin vs PINE's -0.6%
- 6.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
PINE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +44.6% vs NNN's +15.1%
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs MRP's 47.9%
- 13.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.2%
NNN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 5.1%
- Beta 0.04 vs MRP's 0.82
NTST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 151.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 77.3%, current ratio 7.06x
- PEG 1.16 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.05, yield 4.1%, current ratio 7.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.6% FFO/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 65.0% margin vs PINE's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs MRP's 0.82 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.6% vs NNN's +15.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.2% |
MRP vs PINE vs KO vs NNN vs NTST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MRP vs PINE vs KO vs NNN vs NTST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MRP leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • PINE leads 0 • NNN leads 0 • NTST leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 761.4x PINE's $65M. MRP is the more profitable business, keeping 65.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, MRP holds the edge at +135.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $713M | $65M | $49.3B | $936M | $193M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $610M | $45M | $15.5B | $867M | $151M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $463M | -$415,000 | $13.7B | $387M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.4B | -$46M | $12.6B | $464M | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.9% | -4.1% | +61.7% | +81.4% | +90.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +85.1% | +28.0% | +29.3% | +63.3% | +31.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | -0.6% | +27.8% | +41.4% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | -71.7% | +25.5% | +49.6% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +135.7% | +29.6% | +12.1% | +4.1% | +26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.7% | +185.7% | +18.2% | -2.0% | +189.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MRP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, MRP trades at a 95% valuation discount to NTST's 248.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NNN offers better value at 2.02x vs NTST's 4.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $289M | $355.6B | $8.9B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.6B | $678M | $390.8B | $13.7B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.94x | -91.59x | 27.18x | 22.51x | 248.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.41x | 38.82x | 25.27x | 23.04x | 68.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | 2.02x | 4.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.35x | 14.79x | 26.39x | 16.32x | 22.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.48x | 4.77x | 7.42x | 9.57x | 11.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 1.04x | 10.40x | 1.99x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.22x | — | 67.15x | 13.29x | 18.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. MRP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | -0.1% | +41.1% | +8.8% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | -0.1% | +13.1% | +4.1% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +2.2% | +15.8% | +4.8% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +2.8% | +17.3% | +6.4% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 1.31x | 1.33x | 1.09x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $390M | $35.2B | $4.8B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $5M | $10.3B | $5M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.1B | $394M | $45.5B | $4.8B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.36x | 0.82x | 10.70x | 2.93x | 1.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MRP and PINE and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,242 for NTST. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +44.6% total return vs NNN's +15.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRP at 13.9% vs NNN's 7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | +23.6% | +20.3% | +20.9% | +17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.3% | +44.6% | +17.2% | +15.1% | +29.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +44.7% | +47.0% | +24.7% | +24.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +35.4% | +65.6% | +15.9% | +2.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +42.5% | +121.1% | +42.3% | +42.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.9% | +13.1% | +13.7% | +7.6% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRP's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs MRP's 80.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.21x | -0.20x | 0.04x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.00 | $20.80 | $84.04 | $46.90 | $21.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.30 | $13.10 | $65.35 | $38.90 | $16.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +96.9% | +98.3% | +99.3% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 55.0 | 60.6 | 63.6 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 144K | 12.7M | 1.6M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MRP and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MRP as "Buy", PINE as "Buy", KO as "Buy", NNN as "Hold", NTST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.6% upside for NTST (target: $22) vs -0.3% for NNN (target: $46). For income investors, MRP offers the higher dividend yield at 6.18% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.60 | $86.13 | $46.44 | $22.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 12 | 48 | 29 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | +0.2% | +2.5% | +5.1% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | 56 | 36 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.80 | $0.04 | $2.04 | $2.36 | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MRP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MRP vs PINE vs KO vs NNN vs NTST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRP or PINE or KO or NNN or NTST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 20. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRP or PINE or KO or NNN or NTST?
On trailing P/E, Millrose Properties, Inc.
(MRP) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 248. 4x. On forward P/E, Millrose Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NETSTREIT Corp. wins at 1. 16x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRP or PINE or KO or NNN or NTST?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to +2. 4% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus NTST's +42. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRP or PINE or KO or NNN or NTST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Millrose Properties, Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning MRP is approximately -509% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRP or PINE or KO or NNN or NTST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 20. 9% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Millrose Properties, Inc. grew EPS 264. 9% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRP or PINE or KO or NNN or NTST?
Millrose Properties, Inc.
(MRP) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 3% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRP leads at 80. 9% versus 28. 7% for KO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 90. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRP or PINE or KO or NNN or NTST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 68. 5x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 59. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTST: 9. 6% to $22. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRP or PINE or KO or NNN or NTST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
09Is MRP or PINE or KO or NNN or NTST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MRP: +47. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRP and PINE and KO and NNN and NTST?
These companies operate in different sectors (MRP (Real Estate) and PINE (Real Estate) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and NNN (Real Estate) and NTST (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MRP is a small-cap deep-value stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock. MRP, KO, NNN, NTST pay a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.