Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MRVL vs MCHP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
MRVL vs MCHP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $146.14B | $53.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.19B | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.67B | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 44.0x | 62.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.47B | $5.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.64B | $772M |
MRVL vs MCHP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 517.3 | +417.3% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 205.1 | +105.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRVL vs MCHP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRVL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 42.1%, EPS growth 401.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 16.9% 10Y total return vs MCHP's 358.5%
- 42.1% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.70, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, Low D/E 80.0%, current ratio 2.59x
- Beta 1.70, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.1% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (44.0x vs 62.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.6% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs MRVL's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MRVL's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +172.7% vs MCHP's +109.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 6.0% vs 1.8% |
MRVL vs MCHP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MRVL vs MCHP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MRVL and MCHP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRVL is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.2B annually — 1.9x MCHP's $4.4B. MRVL is the more profitable business, keeping 32.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, MRVL holds the edge at +22.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.2B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $820M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.1% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +164.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MCHP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MCHP's 55.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRVL's 111.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146.1B | $53.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $148.0B | $58.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 54.97x | -9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.00x | 62.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 111.85x | 55.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 17.83x | 12.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.26x | 7.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 104.65x | 69.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MRVL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRVL delivers a 19.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. MRVL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MCHP's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRVL scores 7/9 vs MCHP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.4% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.6% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $772M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.17x | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MRVL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRVL five years ago would be worth $37,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,552 for MCHP. Over the past 12 months, MRVL leads with a +172.7% total return vs MCHP's +109.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRVL at 60.5% vs MCHP's 11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +88.9% | +52.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +172.7% | +109.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +313.7% | +38.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +279.4% | +45.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1692.2% | +358.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +60.5% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MCHP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCHP is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVL's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.21x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $172.98 | $99.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.78 | $46.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.9 | 77.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24.3M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
MCHP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MRVL as "Buy" and MCHP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -11.7% upside for MCHP (target: $87) vs -23.2% for MRVL (target: $130). For income investors, MCHP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.84% vs MRVL's 0.14%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $129.52 | $87.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 72 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.2% |
MCHP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). MRVL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MRVL vs MCHP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRVL or MCHP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the stronger pick with 42. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) offers the better valuation at 55. 0x trailing P/E (44. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) a "Buy" — based on 72 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRVL or MCHP?
On forward P/E, Marvell Technology, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 44. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRVL or MCHP?
Over the past 5 years, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) delivered a total return of +279. 4%, compared to +45. 5% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRVL returned +1692% versus MCHP's +358. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRVL or MCHP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
70β versus Marvell Technology, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning MRVL is approximately 30% more volatile than MCHP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 80% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRVL or MCHP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is pulling ahead at 42. 1% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marvell Technology, Inc. grew EPS 401. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, MRVL leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRVL or MCHP?
Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 6% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 32. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRVL leads at 16. 1% versus 6. 7% for MCHP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCHP leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRVL or MCHP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) trades at 44. 0x forward P/E versus 62. 8x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 18. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MCHP: -11. 7% to $87. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRVL or MCHP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 1% for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL).
09Is MRVL or MCHP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
8% yield, +358. 5% 10Y return). Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCHP: +358. 5%, MRVL: +1692%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRVL and MCHP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MCHP pays a dividend while MRVL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.