Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MSW vs STRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
MSW vs STRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $25M | $24.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $34M | $2.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $347M |
| Gross Margin | -3.9% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | 17.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 59.1x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $350M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250K | $391M |
MSW vs STRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ming Shing Group Ho… (MSW) | 100 | 31.1 | -68.9% |
| Sterling Infrastruc… (STRL) | 100 | 417.3 | +317.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSW vs STRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.32
- Rev growth 22.8%, EPS growth -400.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, current ratio 1.08x
STRL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 176.9% 10Y total return vs MSW's -65.5%
- 12.0% margin vs MSW's -16.9%
- +351.7% vs MSW's -40.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.8% revenue growth vs STRL's 17.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.0% margin vs MSW's -16.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs STRL's 2.54 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +351.7% vs MSW's -40.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.7% ROA vs MSW's -45.3%, ROIC 38.9% vs -52.1% |
MSW vs STRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MSW vs STRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STRL leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STRL is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 85.2x MSW's $34M. STRL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSW's -16.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $34M | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $575M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $347M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $440M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +17.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.9% | +12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.5% | +15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +91.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +141.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MSW leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $24.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $24.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.02x | 86.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 59.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 50.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 10.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 23.24x | 22.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 68.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STRL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRL delivers a 32.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-6 for MSW. STRL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSW's 7.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRL scores 6/9 vs MSW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.8% | +32.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.3% | +13.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -52.1% | +38.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -133.1% | +28.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.87x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | -$41M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $249,923 | $391M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $350M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.52x | 27.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STRL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRL five years ago would be worth $350,047 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,453 for MSW. Over the past 12 months, STRL leads with a +351.7% total return vs MSW's -40.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRL at 167.8% vs MSW's -29.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +93.2% | +154.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.6% | +351.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.5% | +1819.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.5% | +3400.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.5% | +17694.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.8% | +167.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSW and STRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSW is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STRL's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STRL currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs MSW's 23.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 2.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.11 | $888.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.60 | $171.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.8% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 88.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 498K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $488.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
STRL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MSW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MSW vs STRL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSW or STRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (MSW) is the stronger pick with 22.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 7% for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) offers the better valuation at 86. 5x trailing P/E (59. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MSW or STRL?
Over the past 5 years, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
(STRL) delivered a total return of +34. 0%, compared to -65. 5% for Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (MSW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRL returned +176. 9% versus MSW's -65. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MSW or STRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (MSW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
32β versus Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning STRL is approximately 92% more volatile than MSW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 8% for Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MSW or STRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (MSW) is pulling ahead at 22.
8% versus 17. 7% for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. grew EPS 13. 4% year-over-year, compared to -400. 0% for Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSW leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MSW or STRL?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
(STRL) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -16. 9% for Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STRL leads at 16. 6% versus -15. 8% for MSW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STRL leads at 22. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MSW or STRL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MSW or STRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (MSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSW: -65. 5%, STRL: +176. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MSW and STRL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.