MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
Other Precious Metals
Market Cap$671M
5Y Perf.-18.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MTA vs GROY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
Other Precious Metals
Market Cap$633M
5Y Perf.-19.8%
MTA vs GROY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MTA | GROY |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Other Precious Metals |
| Market Cap | $671M | $633M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $20M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-1M |
| Gross Margin | 46.4% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | -191.5% | 20.1% |
| Forward P/E | 112.6x | 60.7x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $101K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $12M |
MTA vs GROY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MTA
GROY
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metalla Royalty & S… (MTA) | 100 | 81.6 | -18.4% |
| Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MTA vs GROY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GROY leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
The Income Pick
MTA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.58
- 25.8% 10Y total return vs GROY's 2.5%
- +144.1% vs GROY's +132.9%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
The Growth Play
GROY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 54.5%, EPS growth -18.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 58.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 4.88x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 4.88x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GROY | 54.5% revenue growth vs MTA's -18.7% |
| Value | GROY | Lower P/E (60.7x vs 112.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | GROY | -5.7% margin vs MTA's -223.0% |
| Stability / Safety | GROY | Beta 0.80 vs MTA's 1.58, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MTA | +144.1% vs GROY's +132.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GROY | -0.1% ROA vs MTA's -6.4%, ROIC 0.2% vs -4.0% |
MTA vs GROY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGROYLAGGINGMTA
MTAMetalla Royalty & Str…
1leads
GROYGold Royalty Corp.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MTAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GROY6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GROY4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GROY9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MTA4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GROY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GROY is the larger business by revenue, generating $20M annually — 5.0x MTA's $4M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -5.7% (GROY) to -2.2% (MTA). On growth, GROY holds the edge at +128.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MTAMetalla Royalty &… | GROYGold Royalty Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $20M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.4% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -191.5% | +20.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -168.6% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +107.2% | +128.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.8% | +173.0% |
GROY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GROY leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MTAMetalla Royalty &… | GROYGold Royalty Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $671M | $633M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $677M | $621M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.21x | -152.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 112.58x | 60.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 140.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 278.06x | 40.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.74x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 633.17x |
GROY leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GROY leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GROY delivers a -0.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-7 for MTA. GROY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTA's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GROY scores 6/9 vs MTA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MTAMetalla Royalty &… | GROYGold Royalty Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.7% | -0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.0% | +0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.2% | +0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $101,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.64x | 0.81x |
GROY leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTA five years ago would be worth $7,576 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,340 for GROY. Over the past 12 months, MTA leads with a +144.1% total return vs GROY's +132.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GROY at 16.8% vs MTA's 12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MTAMetalla Royalty &… | GROYGold Royalty Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.5% | -11.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +144.1% | +132.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.2% | +59.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.2% | -26.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2578.5% | +2.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.7% | +16.8% |
MTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MTA and GROY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GROY is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTA's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTA currently trades 78.4% from its 52-week high vs GROY's 66.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MTAMetalla Royalty &… | GROYGold Royalty Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.25 | $5.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.75 | $1.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +66.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 484K | 2.4M |
Evenly matched — MTA and GROY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MTA as "Buy" and GROY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.2% upside for GROY (target: $6) vs 3.4% for MTA (target: $8).
| Metric | MTAMetalla Royalty &… | GROYGold Royalty Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GROY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MTA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallGold Royalty Corp. (GROY)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MTA vs GROY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTA or GROY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gold Royalty Corp.
(GROY) is the stronger pick with 54. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 7% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). Analysts rate Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MTA or GROY?
Over the past 5 years, Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
(MTA) delivered a total return of -24. 2%, compared to -26. 6% for Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTA returned +25. 8% versus GROY's +2. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MTA or GROY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gold Royalty Corp.
(GROY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. 's 1. 58β — meaning MTA is approximately 98% more volatile than GROY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MTA or GROY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gold Royalty Corp.
(GROY) is pulling ahead at 54. 5% versus -18. 7% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -18. 0% for Gold Royalty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GROY leads at 58. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MTA or GROY?
Gold Royalty Corp.
(GROY) is the more profitable company, earning -26. 5% net margin versus -452. 8% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. — meaning it keeps -26. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GROY leads at 10. 9% versus -255. 3% for MTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GROY leads at 76. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MTA or GROY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gold Royalty Corp.
(GROY) trades at 60. 7x forward P/E versus 112. 6x for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. — 51. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GROY: 66. 2% to $6. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — MTA or GROY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MTA or GROY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gold Royalty Corp.
(GROY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80)). Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GROY: +2. 5%, MTA: +25. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MTA and GROY?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GROY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MTA: 107.2% · GROY: 128.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.