MTW vs TER

For growth investors, Teradyne, Inc.

(TER) is the stronger pick with 13. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW). The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) offers the better valuation at 66. 4x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teradyne, Inc. (TER) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

(MTW) is the cheapest at 66. 4x versus Teradyne, Inc. at 110. 0x. On forward P/E, The Manitowoc Company, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Teradyne, Inc.

(TER) delivered a total return of +205. 8%, compared to -45. 3% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TER returned +1967% versus MTW's -44. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

(MTW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 94β versus Teradyne, Inc. 's 2. 60β — meaning TER is approximately 34% more volatile than MTW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teradyne, Inc. (TER) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 84% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teradyne, Inc.

(TER) is pulling ahead at 13. 1% versus 2. 9% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teradyne, Inc. grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -87. 2% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTW leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Teradyne, Inc.

(TER) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus 0. 3% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TER leads at 21. 7% versus 2. 6% for MTW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TER leads at 58. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

(MTW) trades at 19. 0x forward P/E versus 53. 1x for Teradyne, Inc. — 34. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TER: -8. 3% to $351. 09.

In this comparison, TER (0.

1% yield) pays a dividend. MTW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Teradyne, Inc.

(TER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1967% 10Y return). The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TER: +1967%, MTW: -44. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MTW (Industrials) and TER (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.