Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MTZ vs WLDN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
MTZ vs WLDN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $34.15B | $1.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.28B | $682M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $459M | $53M |
| Gross Margin | 12.1% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 51.1x | 18.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.80B | $69M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $396M | $66M |
MTZ vs WLDN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) | 100 | 1106.7 | +1006.7% |
| Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) | 100 | 309.7 | +209.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MTZ vs WLDN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MTZ is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.64
- 18.4% 10Y total return vs WLDN's 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.64, Low D/E 83.9%, current ratio 1.32x
WLDN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 120.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.7%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs MTZ's 16.2%
- Lower P/E (18.4x vs 51.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs MTZ's 16.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.4x vs 51.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs MTZ's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.64 vs WLDN's 1.96 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.6% vs WLDN's +88.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs MTZ's 4.7%, ROIC 11.5% vs 8.9% |
MTZ vs WLDN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MTZ vs WLDN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WLDN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.3B annually — 22.4x WLDN's $682M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.7% (WLDN) to 3.0% (MTZ). On growth, MTZ holds the edge at +34.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.3B | $682M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $459M | $53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $179M | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +37.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.5% | +20.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.9% | +132.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WLDN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, WLDN trades at a 75% valuation discount to MTZ's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WLDN's 17.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTZ's 33.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $34.2B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $36.6B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 85.46x | 21.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 51.09x | 18.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 28.78x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 33.86x | 17.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.39x | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.23x | 3.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 119.53x | 15.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WLDN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WLDN delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $14 for MTZ. WLDN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTZ's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTZ scores 8/9 vs WLDN's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +19.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.2% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $396M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $69M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.37x | 7.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTZ five years ago would be worth $39,623 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,918 for WLDN. Over the past 12 months, MTZ leads with a +199.6% total return vs WLDN's +88.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTZ at 70.1% vs WLDN's 64.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +90.3% | -29.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +199.6% | +88.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +392.0% | +346.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +296.2% | +99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1840.4% | +595.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +70.1% | +64.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MTZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTZ is the less volatile stock with a 1.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WLDN's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTZ currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs WLDN's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $441.43 | $137.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $141.12 | $39.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +55.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.3 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 938K | 342K |
Analyst Outlook
MTZ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MTZ as "Buy" and WLDN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.2% upside for WLDN (target: $118) vs -23.8% for MTZ (target: $330).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $330.25 | $117.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
WLDN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MTZ leads in 3 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
MTZ vs WLDN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTZ or WLDN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 2% for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTZ or WLDN?
On trailing P/E, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus MasTec, Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, Willdan Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTZ or WLDN?
Over the past 5 years, MasTec, Inc.
(MTZ) delivered a total return of +296. 2%, compared to +99. 2% for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTZ returned +1840% versus WLDN's +595. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTZ or WLDN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MasTec, Inc.
(MTZ) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 64β versus Willdan Group, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning WLDN is approximately 19% more volatile than MTZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 84% for MasTec, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MTZ or WLDN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 16. 2% for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MasTec, Inc. grew EPS 146. 1% year-over-year, compared to 120. 9% for Willdan Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WLDN leads at 16. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MTZ or WLDN?
Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 7% net margin versus 2. 8% for MasTec, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WLDN leads at 6. 5% versus 4. 6% for MTZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLDN leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MTZ or WLDN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) trades at 18. 4x forward P/E versus 51. 1x for MasTec, Inc. — 32. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WLDN: 55. 2% to $117. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MTZ or WLDN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MTZ or WLDN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MasTec, Inc.
(MTZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1840% 10Y return). Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTZ: +1840%, WLDN: +595. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MTZ and WLDN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.