Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MVST vs ALB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
MVST vs ALB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $633M | $22.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $428M | $5.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-29M | $-275M |
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 31.5x | 22.4x |
| Total Debt | $186M | $3.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $1.62B |
MVST vs ALB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microvast Holdings,… (MVST) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
| Albemarle Corporati… (ALB) | 100 | 259.2 | +159.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MVST vs ALB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MVST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
- 12.6% revenue growth vs ALB's -4.4%
ALB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.8%
- 202.4% 10Y total return vs MVST's -79.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.60, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 2.23x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.6% revenue growth vs ALB's -4.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.4x vs 31.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.0% margin vs MVST's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.60 vs MVST's 2.45, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +237.9% vs MVST's +2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.7% ROA vs MVST's -2.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs 0.9% |
MVST vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MVST vs ALB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALB is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 12.9x MVST's $428M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -5.0% (ALB) to -6.8% (MVST). On growth, ALB holds the edge at +32.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $428M | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $32M | $802M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | -$275M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $56M | $577M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | -5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.0% | +32.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +119.2% | — |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MVST and ALB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ALB's 32.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MVST's 102.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $633M | $22.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $714M | $24.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.78x | -33.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.50x | 22.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 102.28x | 32.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.48x | 4.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.30x | 32.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALB delivers a -2.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-7 for MVST. ALB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVST's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALB scores 6/9 vs MVST's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.4% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.2% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $81M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $186M | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.53x | 0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALB five years ago would be worth $13,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,665 for MVST. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +237.9% total return vs MVST's +2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVST at 18.1% vs ALB's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.5% | +34.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.1% | +237.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.7% | +6.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +31.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.9% | +202.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.1% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ALB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALB is the less volatile stock with a 1.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MVST's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALB currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs MVST's 27.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.45x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.12 | $215.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.37 | $53.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.5% | +89.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MVST as "Buy" and ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 144.9% upside for MVST (target: $5) vs -0.9% for ALB (target: $191). ALB is the only dividend payer here at 0.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.80 | $190.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
MVST vs ALB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MVST or ALB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) is the stronger pick with 12. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Analysts rate Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MVST or ALB?
Over the past 5 years, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) delivered a total return of +31.
2%, compared to -83. 3% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALB returned +217. 0% versus MVST's -80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MVST or ALB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
60β versus Microvast Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning MVST is approximately 53% more volatile than ALB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 45% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MVST or ALB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) is pulling ahead at 12. 6% versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Microvast Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to 48. 7% for Albemarle Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MVST leads at 27. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MVST or ALB?
Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 8% net margin versus -9. 9% for Albemarle Corporation — meaning it keeps -6. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALB leads at 1. 8% versus 1. 6% for MVST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MVST leads at 28. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MVST or ALB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) trades at 22.
4x forward P/E versus 31. 5x for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVST: 144. 9% to $4. 80.
07Which pays a better dividend — MVST or ALB?
In this comparison, ALB (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. MVST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MVST or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
8% yield, +217. 0% 10Y return). Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +217. 0%, MVST: -80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MVST and ALB?
These companies operate in different sectors (MVST (Industrials) and ALB (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
ALB pays a dividend while MVST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.