Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MVST vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SES
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Auto - Parts
MVST vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SES — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $611M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $302M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $428M | $72M | $71M | $22M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-29M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-73M |
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 36.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | -121.4% | -405.7% | -352.3% |
| Forward P/E | 31.5x | 10.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $186M | $8.76B | $32M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $30M |
MVST vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SES — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microvast Holdings,… (MVST) | 100 | 15.4 | -84.6% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.1 | -79.9% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 559.9 | +459.9% |
| SES AI Corporation (SES) | 100 | 9.4 | -90.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MVST vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SES
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MVST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- beta 2.45
- -6.8% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- Beta 2.45 vs SPIR's 2.93
- -2.9% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 0.9% vs -0.1%
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -78.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- Beta 2.82, current ratio 16.35x
SES lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.8% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.45 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs MVST's -2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.9% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 0.9% vs -0.1% |
MVST vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MVST vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SES — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MVST leads in 2 of 6 categories
ASTS leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • SES leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVST is the larger business by revenue, generating $428M annually — 19.5x SES's $22M. MVST is the more profitable business, keeping -6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $428M | $72M | $71M | $22M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $32M | -$74M | -$237M | -$67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$73M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $56M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | -$58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +36.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -121.4% | -4.1% | -3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | -227.0% | -16.0% | -2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.0% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +15.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +119.2% | +59.5% | -55.6% | -6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MVST and ASTS and SES each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $611M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $302M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $692M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $280M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.00x | 10.01x | -48.76x | -4.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.50x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 99.04x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 14.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.89x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MVST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MVST delivers a -7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVST's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MVST scores 5/9 vs SES's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.4% | -88.4% | -21.1% | -32.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | -0.1% | -47.1% | -35.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.2% | -0.1% | -10.0% | -29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $81M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | -$21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $186M | $8.8B | $32M | $8M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.53x | 9.20x | -21.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $926 for SES. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs MVST's -2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs SES's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.0% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -51.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.1% | +73.1% | +158.1% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.8% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | -40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -90.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.7% | -78.8% | +568.8% | -91.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.7% | +43.9% | +134.8% | -15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MVST and SPIR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MVST is the less volatile stock with a 2.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs SES's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.45x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 2.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.12 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $3.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.37 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $0.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.5% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +25.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 40.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 1.6M | 14.9M | 8.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MVST as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", SES as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 189.0% upside for SES (target: $3) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.80 | $17.25 | $103.65 | $2.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 12 | 7 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
MVST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASTS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MVST vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SES: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MVST or SPIR or ASTS or SES a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MVST or SPIR or ASTS or SES?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -90. 7% for SES AI Corporation (SES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus SES's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MVST or SPIR or ASTS or SES?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 45β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 20% more volatile than MVST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 45% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MVST or SPIR or ASTS or SES?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 29. 0% for SES AI Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MVST or SPIR or ASTS or SES?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MVST leads at 1. 6% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SES leads at 53. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MVST or SPIR or ASTS or SES more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SES: 189.
0% to $2. 70.
07Which pays a better dividend — MVST or SPIR or ASTS or SES?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MVST or SPIR or ASTS or SES better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+568. 8% 10Y return). SES AI Corporation (SES) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASTS: +568. 8%, SES: -91. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MVST and SPIR and ASTS and SES?
These companies operate in different sectors (MVST (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and SES (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SES is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.