Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MX vs DIOD vs POWI vs MPWR vs ON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
MX vs DIOD vs POWI vs MPWR vs ON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $141M | $5.18B | $4.00B | $77.41B | $39.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $180M | $1.56B | $446M | $2.79B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $86M | $17M | $616M | $574M |
| Gross Margin | 16.2% | 31.3% | 53.9% | 55.2% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | -19.3% | 3.5% | 4.6% | 26.1% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 48.5x | 55.5x | 73.1x | 34.4x |
| Total Debt | $47M | $96M | $0.00 | $24M | $3.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $367M | $59M | $1.10B | $2.15B |
MX vs DIOD vs POWI vs MPWR vs ON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnachip Semicondu… (MX) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 751.4 | +651.4% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 610.0 | +510.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MX vs DIOD vs POWI vs MPWR vs ON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, MX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DIOD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 50.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.5%
- +187.1% vs MX's +20.2%
POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- Beta 2.08, yield 1.2%, current ratio 6.51x
- 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs ON's 10.0%
- 26.4% revenue growth vs MX's -22.8%
- 22.1% margin vs MX's -14.1%
- 15.2% ROA vs MX's -7.2%, ROIC 22.2% vs -12.9%
ON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.95, Low D/E 45.1%, current ratio 4.52x
- Lower P/E (34.4x vs 73.1x)
- Beta 1.95 vs MX's 2.29
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs MX's -22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.4x vs 73.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs MX's -14.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.95 vs MX's 2.29 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +187.1% vs MX's +20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs MX's -7.2%, ROIC 22.2% vs -12.9% |
MX vs DIOD vs POWI vs MPWR vs ON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MX vs DIOD vs POWI vs MPWR vs ON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPWR leads in 3 of 6 categories
MX leads 1 • POWI leads 1 • DIOD leads 0 • ON leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ON is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 33.6x MX's $180M. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MX's -14.1%. On growth, DIOD holds the edge at +22.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $180M | $1.6B | $446M | $2.8B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | $162M | $41M | $781M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $86M | $17M | $616M | $574M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | $129M | $85M | $664M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +31.3% | +53.9% | +55.2% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.3% | +3.5% | +4.6% | +26.1% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.1% | +5.5% | +3.7% | +22.1% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.8% | +8.3% | +18.9% | +23.8% | +24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +22.1% | +2.6% | +20.8% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.8% | +4.3% | -60.0% | -88.4% | +93.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 78.7x trailing earnings, DIOD trades at a 77% valuation discount to ON's 346.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIOD's 27.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPWR's 97.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $141M | $5.2B | $4.0B | $77.4B | $39.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $4.9B | $3.9B | $76.3B | $40.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.71x | 78.73x | 184.18x | 123.60x | 346.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 48.48x | 55.51x | 73.12x | 34.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.39x | 79.69x | 97.90x | 28.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 3.50x | 9.02x | 27.74x | 6.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 2.70x | 6.01x | 21.56x | 5.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 37.77x | 45.93x | 116.20x | 27.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-10 for MX. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ON's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIOD scores 6/9 vs MX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.1% | +4.4% | +2.4% | +17.9% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.2% | +3.5% | +2.1% | +15.2% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.9% | +1.6% | +2.4% | +22.2% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.7% | +1.7% | +2.9% | +20.4% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.05x | — | 0.01x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$57M | -$272M | -$59M | -$1.1B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $367M | $59M | $1.1B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $47M | $96M | $0 | $24M | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.08x | 54.72x | — | — | 10.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,594 for MX. Over the past 12 months, DIOD leads with a +187.1% total return vs MX's +20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.1% vs MX's -23.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.0% | +118.9% | +93.2% | +68.5% | +77.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.2% | +187.1% | +44.4% | +148.6% | +159.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.9% | +33.6% | -6.3% | +280.3% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.1% | +51.0% | -8.3% | +366.2% | +160.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | +490.7% | +232.7% | +2494.7% | +1004.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.9% | +10.1% | -2.2% | +56.1% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DIOD and ON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ON is the less volatile stock with a 1.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MX's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIOD currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs MX's 68.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.29x | 2.11x | 2.08x | 2.28x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.64 | $117.80 | $78.94 | $1662.00 | $105.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.18 | $37.97 | $30.86 | $613.00 | $37.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.4% | +95.6% | +91.0% | +94.8% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 80.4 | 76.1 | 71.0 | 81.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 533K | 967K | 577K | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MX as "Buy", DIOD as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", ON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.3% upside for MX (target: $8) vs -38.0% for ON (target: $62). For income investors, POWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $74.00 | $79.00 | $1615.00 | $62.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 13 | 16 | 25 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.2% | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 18 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.84 | $5.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +0.7% | +2.5% | +0.0% | +3.5% |
MPWR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MX vs DIOD vs POWI vs MPWR vs ON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MX or DIOD or POWI or MPWR or ON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation (MX). Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) offers the better valuation at 78. 7x trailing P/E (48. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation (MX) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MX or DIOD or POWI or MPWR or ON?
On trailing P/E, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the cheapest at 78.
7x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 346. 8x. On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 34. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MX or DIOD or POWI or MPWR or ON?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -84. 1% for Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation (MX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +24. 9% versus MX's -23. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MX or DIOD or POWI or MPWR or ON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
95β versus Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation's 2. 29β — meaning MX is approximately 18% more volatile than ON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 45% for ON Semiconductor Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MX or DIOD or POWI or MPWR or ON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -22. 8% for Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation (MX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diodes Incorporated grew EPS 50. 5% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MX or DIOD or POWI or MPWR or ON?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -16. 6% for Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -17. 3% for MX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MX or DIOD or POWI or MPWR or ON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 34.
4x forward P/E versus 73. 1x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 38. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MX: 107. 3% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MX or DIOD or POWI or MPWR or ON?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. MX, DIOD, ON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MX or DIOD or POWI or MPWR or ON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1004% 10Y return).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation (MX) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ON: +1004%, MX: -23. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MX and DIOD and POWI and MPWR and ON?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DIOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while MX, DIOD, MPWR, ON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.