Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MXC logo
MXC
TPET logo
TPET
BATL logo
BATL
HAL logo
HAL
SLB logo
SLB
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MXC vs TPET vs BATL vs HAL vs SLB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MXC
Mexco Energy Corporation

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$16M
5Y Perf.-33.2%
TPET
Trio Petroleum Corp.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-99.3%
BATL
Battalion Oil Corporation

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$20M
5Y Perf.-83.0%
HAL
Halliburton Company

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$29.17B
5Y Perf.+6.7%
SLB
SLB N.V.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$72.19B
5Y Perf.-2.6%

MXC vs TPET vs BATL vs HAL vs SLB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MXC logoMXC
TPET logoTPET
BATL logoBATL
HAL logoHAL
SLB logoSLB
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$16M$3M$20M$29.17B$72.19B
Revenue (TTM)$7M$695K$158M$22.17B$35.71B
Net Income (TTM)$1M$-6M$-51M$1.54B$3.35B
Gross Margin35.0%16.3%46.6%15.3%18.2%
Operating Margin21.7%-7.8%-7.1%11.3%15.3%
Forward P/E9.8x5.2x14.8x18.6x
Total Debt$127K$467K$190M$8.13B$12.31B
Cash & Equiv.$2M$882K$28M$2.21B$3.04B

MXC vs TPET vs BATL vs HAL vs SLBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MXC
TPET
BATL
HAL
SLB
StockApr 23Jun 26Return
Mexco Energy Corpor… (MXC)10066.8-33.2%
Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET)1000.7-99.3%
Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL)10017.0-83.0%
Halliburton Company (HAL)100106.7+6.7%
SLB N.V. (SLB)10097.4-2.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MXC vs TPET vs BATL vs HAL vs SLB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HAL and SLB are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. SLB N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and operational efficiency and capital deployment. MXC, TPET, and BATL also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MXC
Mexco Energy Corporation
The Quality Compounder

MXC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.

  • 18.1% margin vs TPET's -9.3%
Best for: quality
TPET
Trio Petroleum Corp.
The Growth Play

TPET is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 87.0%, EPS growth 81.5%
  • 87.0% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
Best for: growth exposure
BATL
Battalion Oil Corporation
The Value Play

BATL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (5.2x vs 14.8x)
Best for: value
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Long-Run Compounder

HAL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • -6.9% 10Y total return vs MXC's 207.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
  • Beta 0.39, yield 2.0%, current ratio 2.04x
  • Beta 0.39 vs SLB's 0.81
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SLB
SLB N.V.
The Income Pick

SLB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.2%
  • 2.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 6.5% ROA vs TPET's -34.1%, ROIC 12.1% vs -38.5%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTPET logoTPET87.0% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
ValueBATL logoBATLLower P/E (5.2x vs 14.8x)
Quality / MarginsMXC logoMXC18.1% margin vs TPET's -9.3%
Stability / SafetyHAL logoHALBeta 0.39 vs SLB's 0.81
DividendsSLB logoSLB2.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HAL logoHAL+59.8% vs TPET's -78.4%
Efficiency (ROA)SLB logoSLB6.5% ROA vs TPET's -34.1%, ROIC 12.1% vs -38.5%

MXC vs TPET vs BATL vs HAL vs SLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Oil & Gas Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Oil & Gas Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
MXCMexco Energy Corporation
FY 2024
Oil Sales
83.5%$6M
Natural Gas Sales
13.2%$970,811
Other
3.3%$241,581
TPETTrio Petroleum Corp.
FY 2025
Oil Sales
100.0%$398,734
BATLBattalion Oil Corporation
FY 2025
Oil
86.7%$143M
Natural gas liquids
11.1%$18M
Natural gas
2.2%$4M
HALHalliburton Company
FY 2025
Completion And Production
57.6%$12.8B
Drilling And Evaluation
42.4%$9.4B
SLBSLB N.V.
FY 2025
Production Systems
38.4%$13.3B
Well Construction
34.2%$11.9B
Reservoir Characterization
19.7%$6.8B
Digital Integration
7.7%$2.7B

MXC vs TPET vs BATL vs HAL vs SLB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMXCLAGGINGTPET

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MXC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 51372.9x TPET's $695,094. MXC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPET's -9.3%. On growth, TPET holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMXC logoMXCMexco Energy Corp…TPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…BATL logoBATLBattalion Oil Cor…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7M$695,094$158M$22.2B$35.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M-$5M$41M$3.4B$7.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1M-$6M-$51M$1.5B$3.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4M-$3M$40M$1.7B$4.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.0%+16.3%+46.6%+15.3%+18.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.7%-7.8%-7.1%+11.3%+15.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.1%-9.3%-32.1%+6.9%+9.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+56.6%-4.0%+25.2%+7.6%+13.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-26.8%+7.9%-17.7%-0.3%+5.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-90.9%+93.0%-9.6%+129.2%-31.2%
MXC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BATL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.8x trailing earnings, MXC trades at a 58% valuation discount to HAL's 23.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MXC's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLB's 11.1x.

MetricMXC logoMXCMexco Energy Corp…TPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…BATL logoBATLBattalion Oil Cor…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.
Market CapShares × price$16M$3M$20M$29.2B$72.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$15M$3M$182M$35.1B$81.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.77x-0.38x-0.54x23.29x20.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.22x14.82x18.57x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.31x4.00x10.34x11.06x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.20x7.94x0.12x1.31x2.02x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.89x0.25x0.10x2.79x2.62x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.97x17.45x15.06x
BATL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MXC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-39 for BATL. MXC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BATL's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MXC scores 6/9 vs SLB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMXC logoMXCMexco Energy Corp…TPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…BATL logoBATLBattalion Oil Cor…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.5%-37.3%-38.7%+14.6%+13.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.1%-34.1%-10.9%+6.1%+6.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.1%-38.5%-1.5%+10.2%+12.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.7%-51.6%-1.8%+11.6%+14.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965654
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.04x0.98x0.77x0.45x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2M-$414,983$162M$5.9B$9.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$882,162$28M$2.2B$3.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$126,525$467,179$190M$8.1B$12.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense666.44x-14.58x1.63x9.19x9.40x
MXC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HAL five years ago would be worth $17,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $67 for TPET. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +59.8% total return vs TPET's -78.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAL at 5.5% vs TPET's -75.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMXC logoMXCMexco Energy Corp…TPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…BATL logoBATLBattalion Oil Cor…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.6%-62.8%+0.8%+19.2%+21.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-38.9%-78.4%-54.2%+59.8%+37.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-31.8%-98.5%-80.4%+17.4%+8.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.8%-99.3%-90.9%+72.1%+68.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+207.8%-99.3%-88.3%-6.9%-21.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.0%-75.3%-41.9%+5.5%+2.9%
HAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BATL and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BATL is the less volatile stock with a -3.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLB's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLB currently trades 81.8% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 4.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMXC logoMXCMexco Energy Corp…TPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…BATL logoBATLBattalion Oil Cor…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.87x-2.89x-3.46x0.39x0.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.48$2.50$29.70$43.59$58.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.66$0.28$1.00$20.09$31.64
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+48.0%+12.2%+4.0%+80.1%+81.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.135.237.132.533.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded12K4.3M11.7M10.5M12.6M
Evenly matched — BATL and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BATL as "Buy", HAL as "Buy", SLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.7% upside for SLB (target: $60) vs 13.5% for HAL (target: $40). For income investors, SLB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.24% vs MXC's 1.25%.

MetricMXC logoMXCMexco Energy Corp…TPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…BATL logoBATLBattalion Oil Cor…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.64$60.46
# AnalystsCovering analysts26466
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+2.0%+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10304
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.10$0.69$1.08
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.3%0.0%0.0%+3.5%+3.3%
SLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MXC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BATL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMexco Energy Corporation (MXC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MXC vs TPET vs BATL vs HAL vs SLB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MXC or TPET or BATL or HAL or SLB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Trio Petroleum Corp.

(TPET) is the stronger pick with 87. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MXC or TPET or BATL or HAL or SLB?

On trailing P/E, Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) is the cheapest at 9.

8x versus Halliburton Company at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Battalion Oil Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MXC or TPET or BATL or HAL or SLB?

Over the past 5 years, Halliburton Company (HAL) delivered a total return of +72.

1%, compared to -99. 3% for Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MXC returned +207. 8% versus TPET's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MXC or TPET or BATL or HAL or SLB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -3.

46β versus SLB N. V. 's 0. 81β — meaning SLB is approximately -123% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 98% for Battalion Oil Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MXC or TPET or BATL or HAL or SLB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trio Petroleum Corp.

(TPET) is pulling ahead at 87. 0% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trio Petroleum Corp. grew EPS 81. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLB leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MXC or TPET or BATL or HAL or SLB?

Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

3% net margin versus -1826. 3% for Trio Petroleum Corp. — meaning it keeps 23. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MXC leads at 26. 5% versus -1322. 2% for TPET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MXC leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MXC or TPET or BATL or HAL or SLB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) trades at 5.

2x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for SLB N. V. — 13. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLB: 25. 7% to $60. 46.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MXC or TPET or BATL or HAL or SLB?

In this comparison, SLB (2.

2% yield), HAL (2. 0% yield), MXC (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. TPET, BATL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MXC or TPET or BATL or HAL or SLB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -3.

46)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -88. 3%, SLB: -21. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MXC and TPET and BATL and HAL and SLB?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MXC is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPET is a small-cap high-growth stock; BATL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MXC, HAL, SLB pay a dividend while TPET, BATL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.