Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MXL vs SLAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
MXL vs SLAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $7.31B | $7.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $509M | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-132M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 57.0% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.9% | -9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 63.0x | 80.6x |
| Total Debt | $157M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $74M | $364M |
MXL vs SLAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) | 100 | 471.4 | +371.4% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 233.0 | +133.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MXL vs SLAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MXL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 399.3% 10Y total return vs SLAB's 375.6%
- Lower P/E (63.0x vs 80.6x)
- +6.7% vs SLAB's +104.0%
SLAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.25
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 66.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, current ratio 4.69x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs MXL's 29.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (63.0x vs 80.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -8.3% margin vs MXL's -26.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs MXL's 2.77 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.7% vs SLAB's +104.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.1% ROA vs MXL's -16.3%, ROIC -6.9% vs -17.6% |
MXL vs SLAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MXL vs SLAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLAB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $785M annually — 1.5x MXL's $509M. SLAB is the more profitable business, keeping -8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MXL's -26.0%. On growth, MXL holds the edge at +43.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $509M | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$50M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$132M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.0% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.9% | -9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.0% | -8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.0% | +25.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.3% | +88.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SLAB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.4B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -51.67x | -110.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 63.02x | 80.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.63x | 9.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.64x | 6.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1041.08x | 109.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLAB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLAB delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-28 for MXL.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.7% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.3% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.6% | -6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.6% | -6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $83M | -$364M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $74M | $364M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $157M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.75x | -58.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MXL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MXL five years ago would be worth $23,227 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,424 for SLAB. Over the past 12 months, MXL leads with a +668.0% total return vs SLAB's +104.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MXL at 50.8% vs SLAB's 16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +341.1% | +65.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +668.0% | +104.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +242.6% | +58.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.3% | +64.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +399.3% | +375.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.8% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLAB is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MXL's 2.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs MXL's 95.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.77x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $85.43 | $218.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.16 | $102.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 87.5 | 74.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 469K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MXL as "Buy" and SLAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -3.1% upside for SLAB (target: $212) vs -35.4% for MXL (target: $53).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.71 | $211.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
SLAB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MXL leads in 1 (Total Returns).
MXL vs SLAB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MXL or SLAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 29. 7% for MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL). Analysts rate MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MXL or SLAB?
Over the past 5 years, MaxLinear, Inc.
(MXL) delivered a total return of +132. 3%, compared to +64. 2% for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MXL returned +399. 3% versus SLAB's +375. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MXL or SLAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus MaxLinear, Inc. 's 2. 77β — meaning MXL is approximately 122% more volatile than SLAB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MXL or SLAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus 29. 7% for MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silicon Laboratories Inc. grew EPS 66. 6% year-over-year, compared to 46. 1% for MaxLinear, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLAB leads at -8. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MXL or SLAB?
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the more profitable company, earning -8. 3% net margin versus -29. 2% for MaxLinear, Inc. — meaning it keeps -8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLAB leads at -9. 0% versus -27. 1% for MXL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLAB leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MXL or SLAB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MaxLinear, Inc.
(MXL) trades at 63. 0x forward P/E versus 80. 6x for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — 17. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLAB: -3. 1% to $211. 60.
07Which pays a better dividend — MXL or SLAB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MXL or SLAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 25), +375. 6% 10Y return). MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) carries a higher beta of 2. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLAB: +375. 6%, MXL: +399. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MXL and SLAB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.