Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MYE vs DOW vs LYB vs HUN vs WLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
MYE vs DOW vs LYB vs HUN vs WLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $837M | $26.86B | $23.04B | $2.56B | $12.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $784M | $39.33B | $22.48B | $5.69B | $10.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $42M | $-2.76B | $-774M | $-324M | $-1.64B |
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | 6.2% | -19.3% | 12.9% | 1.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -2.3% | -0.9% | -1.0% | -15.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 12.6x | 9.9x | — | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $379M | $19.60B | $15.96B | $2.73B | $6.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $3.82B | $3.45B | $429M | $2.72B |
MYE vs DOW vs LYB vs HUN vs WLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myers Industries, I… (MYE) | 100 | 164.4 | +64.4% |
| Dow Inc. (DOW) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| LyondellBasell Indu… (LYB) | 100 | 112.1 | +12.1% |
| Huntsman Corporation (HUN) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Westlake Corporation (WLK) | 100 | 204.2 | +104.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYE vs DOW vs LYB vs HUN vs WLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -1.3%, EPS growth 389.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
- -1.3% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2%
- 5.4% margin vs WLK's -14.9%
- +97.8% vs WLK's +27.6%
DOW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
LYB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 7.7%
- Beta 0.38, yield 7.7%, current ratio 1.77x
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 26.1x)
- Beta 0.38 vs HUN's 1.73
HUN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 142.4% 10Y total return vs MYE's 95.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 69.3%, current ratio 2.24x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.3% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs WLK's -14.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs HUN's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WLK's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.8% vs WLK's +27.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs WLK's -8.2%, ROIC 9.9% vs -9.0% |
MYE vs DOW vs LYB vs HUN vs WLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYE vs DOW vs LYB vs HUN vs WLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MYE leads in 3 of 6 categories
DOW leads 0 • LYB leads 0 • HUN leads 0 • WLK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MYE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 50.2x MYE's $784M. MYE is the more profitable business, keeping 5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WLK's -14.9%. On growth, HUN holds the edge at +0.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $784M | $39.3B | $22.5B | $5.7B | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $132M | $1.3B | $865M | $160M | -$462M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $42M | -$2.8B | -$774M | -$324M | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | -$2.0B | $3.1B | $135M | -$508M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +6.2% | -19.3% | +12.9% | +1.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | -2.3% | -0.9% | -1.0% | -15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | -7.0% | -3.4% | -5.7% | -14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | -5.1% | +13.6% | +2.4% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.4% | -6.1% | -100.0% | +0.7% | -6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -127.8% | -68.2% | -100.0% | -3.3% | -3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MYE and LYB and HUN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MYE's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYB's 33.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $837M | $26.9B | $23.0B | $2.6B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $42.6B | $35.5B | $4.9B | $16.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.06x | -10.11x | -30.43x | -9.27x | -8.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.34x | 12.62x | 9.92x | — | 26.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.38x | 13.78x | 33.44x | 19.64x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 0.67x | 0.76x | 0.45x | 1.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.86x | 1.52x | 2.26x | 0.86x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.46x | — | 59.99x | 22.11x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYE delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-17 for WLK. WLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYB's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYE scores 5/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.5% | -15.4% | -7.2% | -8.1% | -16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | -4.6% | -3.0% | -4.6% | -8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +0.6% | -1.1% | -0.6% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.2% | +0.5% | -1.1% | -0.7% | -8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | 1.12x | 1.56x | 0.92x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $334M | $15.8B | $12.5B | $2.3B | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $3.8B | $3.4B | $429M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $379M | $19.6B | $16.0B | $2.7B | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.39x | -1.51x | -1.42x | -1.08x | -24.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MYE five years ago would be worth $11,505 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,018 for HUN. Over the past 12 months, MYE leads with a +97.8% total return vs WLK's +27.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MYE at 8.1% vs HUN's -12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.0% | +55.2% | +62.6% | +45.5% | +32.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.8% | +37.3% | +37.2% | +37.5% | +27.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | -17.5% | -5.5% | -33.3% | -12.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.0% | -27.2% | -11.3% | -39.8% | +2.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +12.2% | +48.6% | +57.6% | +142.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | -6.2% | -1.9% | -12.6% | -4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYB and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYB is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUN's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUN currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs WLK's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.76x | 0.38x | 1.73x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.25 | $42.74 | $83.94 | $15.89 | $124.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.39 | $20.40 | $41.58 | $7.30 | $56.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +87.3% | +85.2% | +92.7% | +78.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 48.9 | 50.9 | 65.4 | 32.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 214K | 14.4M | 8.1M | 6.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LYB and WLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYE as "Buy", DOW as "Hold", LYB as "Hold", HUN as "Hold", WLK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for MYE (target: $26) vs -18.6% for HUN (target: $12). For income investors, LYB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.66% vs WLK's 2.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.00 | $39.55 | $73.60 | $12.00 | $101.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 35 | 39 | 33 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +5.6% | +7.7% | +5.7% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | $2.09 | $5.48 | $0.85 | $2.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.1% | +0.5% |
MYE leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
MYE vs DOW vs LYB vs HUN vs WLK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYE or DOW or LYB or HUN or WLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Myers Industries, Inc.
(MYE) is the stronger pick with -1. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Myers Industries, Inc. (MYE) offers the better valuation at 24. 1x trailing P/E (18. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Myers Industries, Inc. (MYE) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYE or DOW or LYB or HUN or WLK?
On forward P/E, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYE or DOW or LYB or HUN or WLK?
Over the past 5 years, Myers Industries, Inc.
(MYE) delivered a total return of +15. 0%, compared to -39. 8% for Huntsman Corporation (HUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLK returned +142. 4% versus DOW's +12. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYE or DOW or LYB or HUN or WLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Huntsman Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning HUN is approximately 355% more volatile than LYB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westlake Corporation (WLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 156% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYE or DOW or LYB or HUN or WLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Myers Industries, Inc.
(MYE) is pulling ahead at -1. 3% versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Myers Industries, Inc. grew EPS 389. 5% year-over-year, compared to -352. 8% for Westlake Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MYE leads at -2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYE or DOW or LYB or HUN or WLK?
Myers Industries, Inc.
(MYE) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 2% net margin versus -13. 5% for Westlake Corporation — meaning it keeps 4. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MYE leads at 10. 3% versus -14. 1% for WLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MYE leads at 31. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYE or DOW or LYB or HUN or WLK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Westlake Corporation — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MYE: 16. 2% to $26. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYE or DOW or LYB or HUN or WLK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB) offers the highest yield at 7. 7%, versus 2. 2% for Westlake Corporation (WLK).
09Is MYE or DOW or LYB or HUN or WLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LyondellBasell Industries N.
V. (LYB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 7. 7% yield). Huntsman Corporation (HUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYB: +48. 6%, HUN: +57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYE and DOW and LYB and HUN and WLK?
These companies operate in different sectors (MYE (Consumer Cyclical) and DOW (Basic Materials) and LYB (Basic Materials) and HUN (Basic Materials) and WLK (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOW is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; LYB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.